TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
If the Who were ampless, what would they smash? One guitar and a drumset?? Lame!!
It is when you have them in DW shells like ZakIt ain't easy trying to cram a bunch of TNT into a Roland V-drum.
Hey guys, let's be real....It ain't easy trying to cram a bunch of TNT into a Roland V-drum.
Why can't people just perform with smaller amps?
I don't think we will just fully shift to modelling. It's just too much. And most musicians don't even have the money to spend on something like a Helix. There will definitely be an increase as the technology becomes more affordable, but I don't think it will shift too heavily.We're currently looking at musicians who have transitioned to using modelers. People for whom playing with headphones using modelers or plugins has been the norm are still mostly in their 20s. I suspect the ratio is going to shift heavily in the coming years.
The chicken fingers I eat prior to going on stage.You mean the fingers that are holding the string down against a metal fret, or the fingers that are holding a plastic pick?
Why can't people just perform with smaller amps?

I don't think we will just fully shift to modelling. It's just too much. And most musicians don't even have the money to spend on something like a Helix. There will definitely be an increase as the technology becomes more affordable, but I don't think it will shift too heavily.
Those metal bands are sort of the exception, probably for a bunch of reasons. But those guys also aren't all in their 20s. Most big metal acts have no one in their 20s anymore. All those guys grew up in a time where modelling was a crazy mans idea of how the future will look like. Modelling just makes everything very consistent, which is probably what makes it so appealing for metal bands.
I would imagine that it goes into the direction where we have alot of effects modelling, but people will still want their amps, be it full tube, hybrid, class A, or class D.
I agree.I don't think we will just fully shift to modelling.
When even huge acts who can still afford to transport massive stage sets (featuring one of the best guitar players on the planet) opt to go for modelers/profilers due to the savings and convenience and consistency, you know that there is a real tidal shift.
Ampless makes sense for large touring acts economically and practically. We will always have that.
That said, this “tidal shift” (altho ampless has been around for years, but maybe newer to metal) will not eradicate real amplifiers from the planet.
I don't think we will just fully shift to modelling. It's just too much. And most musicians don't even have the money to spend on something like a Helix. There will definitely be an increase as the technology becomes more affordable, but I don't think it will shift too heavily.
Those metal bands are sort of the exception, probably for a bunch of reasons. But those guys also aren't all in their 20s. Most big metal acts have no one in their 20s anymore. All those guys grew up in a time where modelling was a crazy mans idea of how the future will look like. Modelling just makes everything very consistent, which is probably what makes it so appealing for metal bands.
I would imagine that it goes into the direction where we have alot of effects modelling, but people will still want their amps, be it full tube, hybrid, class A, or class D.
Never really heard any of those bands reinventing the wheel, to be honest. I don’t think of modelers as doing much other than what players who use amps and pedals do. But yeah, they are really good and they do sell a lot of them. The guitar player in a band I’m working on just got the big Helix board. But he also will be using an amp, maybe two. And they have tubesWith certain genres of metal modelling is part of the sound. Kinda like Marshall in the 80s or Mesa in the 90s. I think early Slipknot was Line6, as was Meshugga. Periphery were the first big AxeFX band I remember, and for awhile everyone was trying to copy them.
I think a lot of us tend to look at modelling as a compromise - the idea that because it's convenient/saves money/soundman doesn't yell at them - but there are people who are using modelling as a stylistic choice.
None of my heroes used modelling, so it's not what I aspire to, but these days there's plenty of kids who see their favourite bands using AxeFX/Kemper/Helix/etc, so that's what they aspire to.
I agree.
It's not gonna kill amps... I'm still using an amp... but ampless is huge. Head to your local overpriced Live Nation concert, grab some Liquid Death water in a can, and check it out for yourself.
I guess in the most literal sense no, as the FOH amplifies you, but for the purposes of this conversation, yes.I like to play my upright mic’ed to FOH best. I’ve been doing this for 33 years. Does that make me ampless?
Never really heard any of those bands reinventing the wheel, to be honest. I don’t think of modelers as doing much other than what players who use amps and pedals do. But yeah, they are really good and they do sell a lot of them. The guitar player in a band I’m working on just got the big Helix board. But he also will be using an amp, maybe two. And they have tubes
On the other hand, they don’t have to reinvent the wheel. All they have to do is do stuff well.
I don't think that's gonna be an issue in the long run, given how effective microtransactions and selling DLC are for tech companies. Everyone gets the same hardware but different software/patches/etc... far more easy to make money on names that way. People who wouldn't buy the Jeremy Axethrower signature Quadruple Stack or the "Cool" Kylie Cornfellow Jazz Combo in real life would be willing to spend a few bucks to have both of their patches in their rig.then they figured out it was hard to sell signature gear when you're known for using a modeller.
I don't think that's gonna be an issue in the long run, given how effective microtransactions and selling DLC are for tech companies. Everyone gets the same hardware but different software/patches/etc... far more easy to make money on names that way. People who wouldn't buy the Jeremy Axethrower signature Quadruple Stack or the "Cool" Kylie Cornfellow Jazz Combo in real life would be willing to spend a few bucks to have both of their patches in their rig.