The tens do respond nicely to a bit if treble boost if that is your thing, they just are not voiced to accentuate it (speaking from experience with my Four 10 which I assume is essentially a potentially louder One 10).
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
My problem is weight so I always go for the lightest carry even if it means more trips. Modular works better for me.Love the BB2+SM performance so much am thinking of not moving with my planned BT2 purchase. Big question is: what's a better schlep - 2 one hand carries or rolling larger box (47#)?
Love the BB2+SM performance so much am thinking of not moving with my planned BT2 purchase. Big question is: what's a better schlep - 2 one hand carries or rolling larger box (47#)?
Cheers,
Ed
Some new experience to relate on gigging out with my BB2 + SM ...
'66 P-bass > Mesa Walkabout, 2 guitar classic rock band
Big thumbs down. Just a meh tone. D /G strings had no weight. I'm positive someone more adept with the WA's dials can do a lot better. Just seemed like nothing I tried worked. WA goes to classifieds
Ed
So how do you like the SM as a stand alone ?I just added a SM to my BB2 about 10 days ago, and like it a lot as a combo.
To each their own of course, but I like the modular system, b/c you have options.... small (SM); medium/large (BB2); and large/large (BB2 + SM).
In fact I have a One10 also, so I have all kinds of options: tiny (One10) small (SM) medium #1 (SM + One10) medium #2 (BB2) or large (BB2 + SM). I hesitate to call a BB2 "medium" since it can cover a lot; for 90% of my gigs, a single BB2 will cover it, but the tone of two 12's is pretty appealing even when you don't need it for volume.
The one advantage to a BT2 is it has caster wheels, as you noted... but if I am going big and it's a long haul down hallways, elevators etc (read: hotel etc) then I cart it anyway; and if there are stairs, you're really better off with two smaller cabs than one big one IMO.
Also, sticking with what you already have, SM + BB2, which you already know sounds awesome, is the most cost-effective choice too.
For me, I went with two small lighter boxes (One10's) through a Mesa D800. I use one of those light-weight folding hand trucks to schlep it all, My total weight for my rig, bass, amp, cables and all is under 50#.Big question is: what's a better schlep - 2 one hand carries or rolling larger box (47#)?
Some new experience to relate on gigging out with my BB2 + SM ...
'66 P-bass > Mesa Walkabout, 2 guitar classic rock band
Big thumbs down. Just a meh tone. D /G strings had no weight. I'm positive someone more adept with the WA's dials can do a lot better. Just seemed like nothing I tried worked. WA goes to classifieds'66 P-bass > GB Streamliner 900, same classic rock band
Fabulous tone right away. Tweaking led to even better. So much heft all across the spectrum. I feel this combo make my playing very responsive. I don't play as hard to get the desired attack and lower intensity playing immediately projects as desired.Love the BB2+SM performance so much am thinking of not moving with my planned BT2 purchase. Big question is: what's a better schlep - 2 one hand carries or rolling larger box (47#)?
Cheers,
Ed
I went light due to my health and getting older. I shopped around for about a year before I finally bit the bullet on the Barefaced and the Mesa. I have about $1600 invested in my gig, which also sounds crazy to me in a way. . drool
So how do you like the SM as a stand alone ?
Could you offer a opinion about the difference in tone between the barefaced and the Bergantino ?
Thanks. I got try out a Berg HDN112. I liked it, but it had more of the modern "mid-forward" sound. Closest Bergantino dealer to me is Charlotte, NC, and they have minimal stock. I tried out a Genzler BA112-3 also and it had a deeper bottom and smoother top end, similar to my One10's.Well they are both good, different flavors of delicious. Both cabs are truly well designed and well made.
The One 10 doesn't have as much high end but it has plenty for me, I tend towards a more deep and vintage sound and The One 10 can do that with a solid low end and still be clear. The NV115 has a really solid low end, to me it sounds like you are hearing more of the fundamental, like a really powerful and clear PA system and the mids are clear without any harshness. The sealed NV115 pairs really well with my Tonehammer. I had not played if for like six months and then gigged with it and was really impressed. I bought the CN112 because I needed a smaller cab to fit in my Miata and it is my go to cab for most gigs, always easy to get a good tone out of it. Very good dispersion, very clear, solid lows. If I had to do it again it would probably have made more sense to buy 2 CN112s but I currently play in two acoustic bands and play at very moderate volume levels. And having variety of gear to use is nice. Not any good bass shops in Roanoke but Rocket Music in Blacksburg is a Berg dealer and made a couple trips there last year.
You might be the closest Barefaced Owner that I have seen yet. No one in Roanoke knows what they are, I have had people come up to me and ask me if the TH is going to blow the One 10 apart!
I've never tried a Super Midget but it would be nice to do a comparison with the CN112.
It's like that here in Hickory, NC. If it ain't Peavey, Fender, or Ampeg people think it is an "off-brand". Until they hear it.You might be the closest Barefaced Owner that I have seen yet. No one in Roanoke knows what they are
Thanks. I got try out a Berg HDN112. I liked it, but it had more of the modern "mid-forward" sound.
It's like that here in Hickory, NC. If it ain't Peavey, Fender, or Ampeg people think it is an "off-brand". Until they hear it.![]()
I've seen it mentioned here a couple of times but no one has really given a definitive comment on pairing an SC with a One10. Anyone have practical experience with mixing drivers? Does it work?
This is quite the excellent pairing, despite lack of popularity.
![]()
![]()