I really like the ibanez stuff and I'd say the RB1005 is on par with the Nordie equipped models.
Two things I don't care for...
-16.5 mm string spacing (all SR and many other bass models)
-35" scale neck (all BTB basses)
So for Ibanez that leaves the Grooveline (34" 18.5mm string spacing and $$$) or the ATK 5 string. I like the ATK's. They sound and play great but tend to be heavy and I just really don't like the bridge.
With the RB1005 Here is what I like and why I ordered,
-Lightweight -Mine is 8lbs 5 oz, looks like they run around 8. This was per Rocco
-Nice Electronics
-Very nice bridge
-Solid Tuners
-Light weight
-18 mm string spacing at the bridge (not too narrow, not too wide)
-Nice Figured top and solid woods throughout
What I don't like
-The pointy head stock. I'm over it now but it's pointy
-Needed shielding to work in my very electrically noisy basement, Usable stock but really needs better shielding
-Strings don't line up perfectly over the pickup pole pieces, still sounds great just annoys me
What surprised me
-Really comfortable to play on a strap
-Very, very comfortable neck, I mean seriously
-Can sound just like a P bass
-Damn good fret work
Based on my primary criteria there isn't much at this price point to compete. I would buy it again if I had to do it over. Though I would pay full price and order from
Sweetwater this time. I bought mine from eBay for a discount and ended up regretting it.
Now if you are down with (and it looks like you are)the Narrow string spacing on the SR or the 35" scale/typical 9.5 lb + weight on the BTB's those are really nice basses. I came very close to picking one up if I could find a light one but know that I just don't care for the feel of 35" scale. I can get used to the narrow spacing on the SR but once I do I have a hard time going back to my regular spaced 4 strings. With the 18 mm spacing on the RB I have no problems like that. I guess I'm just weird like that.