- Apr 3, 2003
- 35,518
- 19,954
- Disclosures
- Editor-in-Chief, Bass Gear Magazine
A difficult question as not everybody likes the same things. From comments in other threads, it seems the "TB consensus" is that MTDs are better, the thinking being Mr T has only gotten better at his craft as time has gone by. To me it seems more that with the old Tobias basses he perfected one type of bass. With MTD he began building and perfecting a different type of bass. I wouldn't say one is good, and one is bad.
I would tend to agree with this. I currently own multiple pre-Gibson Tobias basses (Basic 5, Basic 4, Killer-B 4) and multiple MTDs (435, three 535's, Saratoga 4), and I have previously owned numerous other examples of each. The craftsmanship, build, and overall "quality" of each are highly comparable. The materials/electronics/finishes/etc of course changed and evolved, and each is a representation of the then current "state of the art" at the time that they were made.
Myself and others have commented in prior threads on the general compare/contrast between the two, but I'll summarize briefly by saying that my Tobias basses are a bit more full/smooth/round, and my MTDs are a bit more clear/cutting/precise/quick/snappy. That does not mean, however, that Tobiases are not articulate and clear, nor does it mean that MTDs are thin or sterile. The feel is a bit different, too, with the Tobiases being 34" scale neck-through builds, and (most) MTDs being 35" scale bolt-ons.
I'm very happy to own examples of each, and they are each their own kind of instrument. It always amazes me how Mike Tobias has been able to deliver a "Hall of Fame" performance twice over, with two different bodies of work which stand on their own unique merits.
