Offspring bassist??

[Lovebown]

Originally posted by Traveler
True, PanteraFan, you got me on the spelling of Quantum. But the debate over the Ultimate Theory isn't limited to just astrophysics. It incorporates all physics, and is a very large debate. And even though this forum is devoted to bass players, I find it far more mature to debate Superstrings than whether Greg "K" is a better player than Jaco Pastorius.

If you go to a bass site to discuss physics you're pretty damn stupid, no offense. Granted, there are probably a few people on here interested in that stuff, most are here (hopefully) to discuss bass,
music, and the music community.

Also, I agree arguing over who is better between these bassists is kinda useless, but that's not why I entered the discussion in the first place (if you read the thread).

And last, you should probably rephrase "far more mature" to "far more interesting" or "far more creative" since it's not relevant what is mature or not. Who argues something because its "mature" ??


"The more you know the less you think you know"

/lovebown

 

[*ToNeS*]

who the f*ck said Greg KIESEL was a better bassist than Jaco ? as far as i know, that never came into the discussion. raging out of control argument .. whatever. point is, the guy who just jumped into the thread and started calling us all idiots is perhaps, the most moronic person here - he didn't even read half the previous posts and, for some reason, felt compelled to bring up f*cken astrophysics, as if we're all supposed to go, "OoOoOOo SMART!"

read the entire thread beforehand. and if you got something *intelligent* to add, jump in. but what was the goddamn point of your post ?

 

[PanteraFan]

Originally posted by *ToNeS*
who the f*ck said Greg KIESEL was a better bassist than Jaco ? as far as i know, that never came into the discussion. raging out of control argument .. whatever. point is, the guy who just jumped into the thread and started calling us all idiots is perhaps, the most moronic person here - he didn't even read half the previous posts and, for some reason, felt compelled to bring up f*cken astrophysics, as if we're all supposed to go, "OoOoOOo SMART!"

read the entire thread beforehand. and if you got something *intelligent* to add, jump in. but what was the goddamn point of your post ?

I agree with you there Tones.

Actually, this debate isn't going to get us anywhere. Petty namecalling on both sides won't solve anything or enlighten anyone, and it's obvious that neither of us is gonna back down.

And I find the astrophysical part of the topic in Einstein's Theory...

I think that thge only way to actually solve this debate is to prove the Theory. It'll clear up a lot of details in the conflict between Quantum Mechanics and the Theory...but considering we can't yet travel at lightspeed, a lot of physics debaters are gonna argue this till we do start travelling at 2 x (10 to the power of 8) m/s.

 

[Hategear]

Originally posted by Da5id HeX
You know how it goes: If you can't say anything nice.........

...at least make sure they are out of the damn room.

 

[yawnsie]

Originally posted by Traveler
Now if you wanna find something good to argue over, I will join in, something such as whether or not Superstring Theory solves the incompatibility between the Uncertainty Principle of Quantam Mechanics and Einstein's General Theory of Relativity.

Somebody go and get JT!!

 

[cassanova]

i got a few complaints on some of the replies on this thread....the guilty parties know who they are!.........I wont put up with childesh name calling and people starting fights....if you absolutly feel the need to call someone a name then just dont post anything at all!! I and many others are sick of people starting childesh crap, there is no need for it! thread closed!

oh and chaoslord..DONT ever call someone an ******* in this or any other forum again!! I wont put up with it nor will the other mod's here.