• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Old School vs. New School Amplification

Thrust me, I played a lot of different gear, what I described is not e generalization thats what I observed,
and interestingly it was in most cases not only me hearing it this way...
Take a Glock HR and a All Tube amp, you will hear the same things, I bet...
My bad I forgot to state that the cab is quite transparent and clear sounding, the basses also.
All Tube, SS like the HRII and Class D do sound different, different character different reacting, if one does not hear that, then if he must be deaf...

:) I agree with you that every amp sounds different from every other amp, due to hundreds of design decisions and thousands of interactions among components, many of them non-linear.
 
My position is affected more by all the lousy consumer grade electronics and appliances that have failed long before they should have or failed because the manufacture was counting on planned obsolescense to keep their revenue stream flowing.

I can't even count how many expensive items have died prematurely due to failures in the board that were simply not cost effective to repair.

Our society has been trained to accept failure, to be afraid to buy a new product without an extended warranty, to accept disposable consumer electronics as normal.

I can't avoid buying certain items that are built with offshore labor, like Computers, but I do so reluctantly.

When it comes to buying bass and guitar amps, I do have better options, supporting highly respected custom builders who are absolutely dedicated to excellence.
 
My position is affected more by all the lousy consumer grade electronics and appliances that have failed long before they should have or failed because the manufacture was counting on planned obsolescense to keep their revenue stream flowing.

I can't even count how many expensive items have died prematurely due to failures in the board that were simply not cost effective to repair.

Our society has been trained to accept failure, to be afraid to buy a new product without an extended warranty, to accept disposable consumer electronics as normal.

I can't avoid buying certain items that are built with offshore labor, like Computers, but I do so reluctantly.

When it comes to buying bass and guitar amps, I do have better options, supporting highly respected custom builders who are absolutely dedicated to excellence.

And yet, again, the reliability of amplifiers (as measured by failure rates and need for repair) continues to exponentially improve. Again, your premise makes little sense to me. That being said, I too have purchased some products just due to their 'handmade' or at least uber quality vibe (Monique, Glockenklang, Walter Wood, Thunderfunk, etc.). Beautiful stuff that sounds great. Are they more reliable, more easy to repair, or do they sound better in an absolute sense than the uber quality, current mass produced units I also own..... to me, not at all.

I will again +1 your point that, if budget allows, as has been the case since the beginning of time, I always recommend staying away from the total bargain basement stuff for sure... products that are made primarily to hit the lowest price point possible.

That being said, my primary point in this thread is that a player who eliminates an entire class of product, regardless of what that 'class' is based on (power amp type, power supply type, preamp design, number of knobs, etc., etc.) might very well miss out on the amp of their dreams. Kind of similar to posts I see saying 'I like the sound out 10" speakers', not realizing that there is just as much variance in tonality and performance within 10" driver loaded cabs as there is across cabs with different driver size. Focusing on the most obvious or vivid difference (e.g., power amp design, size of driver, neck through versus bolt on, etc,) is not really the best way to narrow down options IMO and IME.

The great news is, there are more options out there now than ever, and everyone should (and assuming you have enough money, can....)like what they play, and play what they like
 
Last edited:
I think he means that you misread, misinterpreted or misunderstood something you read somewhere.
I agree with Bob as too,I can't remember seeing anything supporting tubes responsible for odd harmonics and solid state for even harmonics. If anything, it's the opposite primarily because of the circuit topologies commonly attributed to each type of device as much as the device itself.
 
In a controlled environment like a studio, tube amps like the B-15 make sense for those wanting that tonal color. They make less sense when the rigors of the road come in to play.

And... nobody said tube amps were a "bad idea". It is you that claims that modern amps are a bad idea- full of compromises, shortcuts and questionable labor practices.
 
I dug up a guts shot of a twin of my aforementioned crappy old Univox. The build reeks of attention to detail! :)

Mine didn't have a fancy schmancy Webber speaker in it - just some anonymous thing from Japan's distant past. It also looks like someone bothered re-capping this thing at some point. Mine was full of genuine "vintage" (AKA ancient, failing, super low quality) caps.
img_4579-2.jpeg
 
Last edited:
The most recorded bass amp in history is a funky old Ampeg B-15
If tube amps are such a bad idea, then how come so many high end recording studios still depend on them?

Wow, we are all over the place now. Who in the world said tube amps were bad or a bad idea.

Again, every amp sounds different, and the B-15's tone (due as much to the cab/driver as anything else) is a beautiful tone at low volumes for sure.
 
I agree with Ken - the advantages of modern equipment can't be ignored. Current PC board, SMPS and class D based power amps get practically zero bench time.

Recording and live are two uses that are light years apart in terms of where the design trade offs can be made. If as far as an amp has to travel is from the storage room to a studio and it just has to get loud enough to make a happy noise into a RE-20, yeah, a B-15 is great. As nice as that B-15 sounds - how much would anybody's infatuation remain after lugging it from a parking garage, through the bowels of a hotel, up onto a stage and then back again to the car after a four hour gig?

I used to use tube amps live. No more. Recording - there I'm darn happy with a good DI and a endless mug of coffee.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sartori
I agree with Ken - the advantages of modern equipment can't be ignored. Current PC board, SMPS and class D based power amps get practically zero bench time.

Recording and live are two uses that are light years apart in terms of where the design trade offs can be made. If as far as an amp has to travel is from the storage room to a studio and it just has to get loud enough to make a happy noise into a RE-20, yeah, a B-15 is great. As nice as that B-15 sounds - how much would anybody's infatuation remain after lugging it from a parking garage, through the bowels of a hotel, up onto a stage and then back again to the car after a four hour gig?

I used to use tube amps live. No more. Recording - there I'm darn happy with a good DI and a endless mug of coffee.

Yeah, but I don't much care for the digital coffe. It is bitter.