playing for free is one thing i have no problem with.. being told we have to sell tickets in order to play.. now that is something i have a major problem with...
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I'd just like to add that everyone loves the old "market sets the rate" line of thinking until its their line of work getting undercut. No one likes to see their job sent overseas to cheaper labor, or given over to illegal immigrants, or given over to more efficient machines.
I've had experience in three very different music scenes.
1. In New Orleans, being a musician is still considered a valuable contribution to society. People support local live music, both originals and covers, and musicians are paid. A professional musician can easily make a living doing nothing but playing. The community of musicians is very tightly knit. A band showing up and playing for free would not be well received at all. This also happens to be my absolute favorite city for music- a vibrant scene of professionals who can play.
2. In Charleston, SC, there is a much smaller scene. There is very little demand for live music and most bars don't really care if they have bands or not. The generally accepted practice for unknown bands is a cut of the door, with usually some free drinks thrown in. Once a band can draw a decent crowd (anything over 50 people), they can negotiate a guarantee. Some bands do end up playing for free if they don't meet the minimum at the door (maybe 10 people). This is a pretty good music scene, with interesting bands and fun venues, but very few musicians making a living off their music.
3. Hell-Ay. The worst. An over-saturated mess of bad bands and greedy club owners. Most bands are more concerned with "making it" than making good music. Most unknown bands pay to play, and are usually stuck going on at 8pm as the first act of a 10-band showcase, getting maybe three songs in front of an empty bar, all for the dream that some Junior A&R will happen to hear them and make their dreams come true. There are a ton of professional musicians in town, though for the most part they make their living during the day doing studio work (of which there is a ton). Many of them play gigs at night, and I'm sure they aren't playing for free, but they may be playing for cheap.
So yes, the scene does matter most of all. I think the biggest thing determining the make-up of the three scenes I've had the most experience with is motivation of the artists. In New Orleans, most musicians aren't trying to "make it" on a national level. Some do, and over the last few years many have, but for the most part the musos I know are happy playing locally. In Charleston, no one expects to make it. Most bands are happy to get paid a little and be able to play what they like. In L.A., national success is the main motivation. No one cares about the L.A. scene because they all view it as jumping off point for the massive success that they just know is around the corner.
. . . my guitarist suggested trying to organize the local bands and refuse to play for free . . .
As someone who has worked in industries massively messed with by H1B visas, foreign employees, and massive amounts of automation - I didn't love "markets sets the rate".
I didn't hate it either.
It just IS. Pure reality. Efficiency will continue to improve, specialization will continue, and manufacturing will find the lowest cost place of doing business.
You can argue with the market, and you can battle the market - but the only way to win is to play the market.
playing for free is one thing i have no problem with.. being told we have to sell tickets in order to play.. now that is something i have a major problem with...
You can win by playing the market. You will win by controlling the market. In too many cities bands have let the venues control the market. It doesn't need to be this way.
I dont disagree, but how does one go about controlling the market, or rather, how can original bands take the market back from the venues? This is something Im constantly trying to figure out.
Like everything else, it comes down to money. The best way is to be proactive when doing your booking. Make sure the bar/club owners know you treat your band like a business, and that you respect that they are running a business as well. Use booking contracts, written down and signed before the night of the gig. Don't expect something for nothing, and don't let the bar owner expect that either. A graduated pay scale based on head count is a great way to make the bar owner comfortable, something like this:
0-20 people= $0
20-50 people= $250
50-75 people= $350
75-100 people= $500
100+= $750
(I didn't put much thought behind those numbers, but you get the idea.) That way if you don't draw the bar owner isn't out anything. If you do draw, you get paid. After a couple nights of drawing 100 people, that bar owner will be very open to negotiating a lower guarantee (of course, at that point, you should be ready for a bigger venue/bigger challenge).
There's also the route of avoiding bars/clubs and going with open venues where you pay a flat rate to book the space and then do what you want with it. This is especially good for younger bands that can't play in bars. Maybe you get 3 or 4 like-minded bands together, rent a hall and every group sells tickets. If everyone band draws 50 people, you play in front of 200 and split all the profits.
My first Fugazi show was at a small town community center, that they rented out. Charged a few bucks a the door. If it works for Fugazi...Elks clubs and other organizations rent their halls for drug and alcohol free shows for teens. This is not new.
Your last suggestion works. I see it done in Hawaii. It is a great way to meet the needs of the under 21 crowd. Elks clubs and other organizations rent their halls for drug and alcohol free shows for teens. This is not new. I saw Canned Heat (original members) at the opening of the Salem Youth Center years ago. Bob "The Bear" Hite palmed my skull like a basketball and asked me if I was having fun. Of course I said yes. I was 11 years old.
I'd just like to add that everyone loves the old "market sets the rate" line of thinking until its their line of work getting undercut. No one likes to see their job sent overseas to cheaper labor, or given over to illegal immigrants, or given over to more efficient machines.
how does one go about controlling the market, or rather, how can original bands take the market back from the venues? This is something Im constantly trying to figure out.
....now I am a weekend warrior, therefore not doing it for a living, therefore my playing is second rate. Did my ability to play drop ten points the day I took a day job?
Stumbo said:Lots of people have hobbies that do not generate income. Seems to me that playing in a band is a hobby for many people who don't care/need to generate cash to continue with their hobby.
I hope that pros are better player than amateurs. As a job you spend all your time on it. If someone that plays 10hours a day, 6 days a week is not able to come up with someting better than someone that can only play a few hours a week, he should start looking for another job...Hi Stumbo, I agree. My post was a question to Beggar98 who is arguing that amateurs are lesser players than pro.
Lots of people have hobbies that do not generate income. Seems to me that playing in a band is a hobby for many people who don't care/need to generate cash to continue with their hobby.
