I notice some people talk about "short scale" when referring to basses for people with small hands. What is short scale/what is considered "short scale? What does "scale" mean in that context?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
MarTONEbass said:A typical bass has a 34" scale length.
Scale length is twice (2X) the length between the nut and the 12th fret. Many 5+ string basses are 35" scale or longer, long scale.
A short scale is a bass with a scale length of less than 34".
All of the above definitions are correct. Now, what does that mean from the perspective of the bass player?
In the simplest terms, scale length involves the length of the neck of the bass and the distance between frets. A "short scale" bass should have a measurement of 31 inches or less from the nut at the top of the fretboard to the saddles on the bridge. This is the length of the string that will vibrate when plucked.
Standard scale basses measure about 34 inches for this same distance (nut to bridge saddles). These include the Fender Precision and Jazz basses, which have kind of become the models by which all electric basses are measured.
So .... "Short Scale" means that the bass has a shorter neck (usually by about three inches) and less distance between frets.
This difference of 3 inches makes these basses much easier to play for people with smaller hands (including many women and children), or people with arthritis or other hand injuries.
But, short scale basses are not JUST for people with small hands. Many folks with larger hands prefer the playability of a short scale bass. Its just a matter of what feels best to the player.
I hear you bassbully. I wouldn't say I have small hands per se, but I have shorter fingers than I really should...especially compared to my thumbs which are longer than "normal". The thing that always ticked me off was my stubby pinky, and the lack of decent movement because of that. I've overcome that in my playing, but it is still irritating. Finally got me a shortscale a few weeks ago and it is perfect. I still play around on longscales in shops but the difference in ease of play and sheer enjoyment is quite present.
I hear you bassbully. I wouldn't say I have small hands per se, but I have shorter fingers than I really should...especially compared to my thumbs which are longer than "normal". The thing that always ticked me off was my stubby pinky, and the lack of decent movement because of that. I've overcome that in my playing, but it is still irritating. Finally got me a shortscale a few weeks ago and it is perfect. I still play around on longscales in shops but the difference in ease of play and sheer enjoyment is quite present.
That definition is what some bassists take, but it wreaked havoc on string makers and instrument makers when the strings turned out too long or short. At some point they got together and said 34" is long, 32" medium, and 30" short scale.
Or so i've heard.