• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Paul McCartney's style/tone

I get fairly close by stepping on "7B" on my Line 6 BODXTLive which is the Acoustic 360 model that I've tweaked to boost....you guessed it...the low mids. This gives a "bassy" sound when played normally. If you play toward the bridge a bit and combine that with muting/cutting off the notes a bit early(similating dead/flatwound strings, a semi-hollow body bass) with your hands...it gets real close.

On a jazz bass?
Use the neck pickup, set your amp to be as "bassy" as you can, and then vary your technique in your hands until you get your bass to give you what you want.

+1 to the "very hard to clone someone's sound" and "why bother if you're not in a tribute band". I do it to make cover songs sound more like the original sort of...
 
Thanks, Johnny, for the further tips. I'm in no danger of cloning anyone's sound, that's for sure.
I'm not in a tribute band, we're more of a jazz duo (sometimes a trio), and we do And I Love Her so that it's recognizable, but I don't think anyone is in danger of confusing us with either the Beatles or a tribute band. It does give me confidence, though, if I sound the way I think I should in my mind - and it's the confidence that's needed here, more than anything. Paul is a very confident bass player.

I just really like the way Paul sounds on that song and want to head in the right direction. BTW, the instructions about pickups and boosting the low-mids were really good - I've tried just about all the suggestions except the foam muting and it's much better, I'm way more satisfied with it now.

I also appreciate the help in understanding what comprises Paul's tone and what kinds of things I can tweak, not just to emulate him, but to understand what my bass and amp can do.

BTW, boosting the low-mids on the amp also made my jazz practice different and more enjoyable, to me anyway.

Thanks again, everyone I really appreciate all the tips.
 
I bought a Hofner Icon and then put some LaBella Beatle flatwould strings on it, and I get an excellent Beatle bass tone. I play through an Ampeg B100R combo, and the sound is fantastic for my band, and we do a lot of early Beatles.

Yes, Paul uses his thumb on songs like TILL THERE WAS YOU and other ballads, he says in a BASS PLAYER interview it gives a fatter, warmer sound than a pick does, which is more aggressive sounding. I use that technique when playing slow, ballady tunes.
 
If you're using a Jazz, try TI Jazz Flats. I'd advise that yopu leave the tone wide on the bass wide open, shut off the bridge pickup and compensate for bass with your amp setting. Play near the front pickup or even at the end of the fretboard. Thumb works for songs that don't require very fast stuff, but two fingers gives you almost the same tone and better ability to play fast.
 
Thanks, McCartneyman - I'm so much closer that I'm happy. Sneckumhaw - you're right, although I think on And I love her, it may be his thumb (can't recall which DVD to pop in to check - but on the Ed Sullivan set, there are pretty good close-ups and yes, most of the time he's using a pick, I'm pretty sure).

I need to watch again though. If folks haven't seen the Ed Sullivan DVD's (there are four shows on two DVD's, about 20 songs total), they're really great at showing Paul and his technique.
 
Before you go and spend money on new strings or a new bass, try playing the notes in a different position. Play on the lower strings, higher on the neck. This will give you a tone that's a little closer to a short scale bass sound.

And of course, try the other techniques already mentioned like using the neck pickup and plucking closer to the neck rather than the bridge. Both pickups together on a Jazz might work well, too, because the parallel wiring tends to reduce the midrange a bit. And finally set the tone knob to taste.
 
Thanks, Paul. Where I pluck really does make a difference. I'll play with the pick-ups more today - but taking out some of the midrange and moving closer to the bridge have really helped give the little extra something I was looking for.

I'm obviously a total n00b when it comes to figuring these things out, but attempting to follow the advice you've all given has really made for a great couple of weeks of practice.

For all McCartney lovers: the Ed Sullivan 2-DVD set of Beatles appearance is the bomb. The camera focuses a lot on Paul and Paul's hands - I'd seen a few songs over and over, of course, but there are more than 20 songs altogether (including Paul playing solo guitar and singing Yesterday). Really fun to watch and study.
 
My pitch/tone sounds close - but somehow, his bass seems much deeper than mine (I'm not sure how to put this). It could be partly volume - I have no idea ( I just started, I'm no Sir Paul ).
[snip]
In particular, when I play notes on my G string, they don't sound like Paul's. The rest sounds okay, considering.

Heh, I ran into the identical situation. I use a P bass and, in general, it's fine but I found that McCartney's notes on the G string (and the D string to a lesser extent) were very bassy and much deeper than mine. My notes on the G string sounded "twangy" - like a guitar string. His notes were mellow and could easily be mistaken for being an octave lower. I liked that -- a lot.

So I did a lot of experimenting. I tried tweaking my amp (Ampeg SVT3 PRO) every possible way and I tried a bunch of different strings (flatwounds and roundwounds).

To make a long story short, the one thing that helped most was using TI Jazz Flats. They gave me a deep, mellow sound on the D and G strings that seemed in the ballpark of the McCartney sound. They are not exact but are reasonably close - far closer than all other strings I tried.

However, with the TI flats, I seemed to have a problem with the E string. It had no growl. It had a dull sound. So I did a little more experimenting.

In the end, I chose to use the TI flatwounds for the A, D and G strings and use a Fender tapered roundwound on the E. The roundwound gives me that classic growl on the E string. The A string seemed to sound the same whether I used flatwound or roundwound; it could have gone either way.

It's an unconventional setup but I like it. I don't know anybody else who mixes roundwounds and flatwounds but I got the sound I like. And, as I said, it is in the ballpark of the McCartney sound. Not exact, but reasonably close.

Most every day, I practice from my repertoire of songs -- many of which are Beatles tunes. I'm very satisfied with the tone I get for Beatles and non-Beatles tunes.
 
If you're using a Jazz, try TI Jazz Flats. I'd advise that yopu leave the tone wide on the bass wide open, shut off the bridge pickup and compensate for bass with your amp setting. Play near the front pickup or even at the end of the fretboard. Thumb works for songs that don't require very fast stuff, but two fingers gives you almost the same tone and better ability to play fast.

Before you go and spend money on new strings or a new bass, try playing the notes in a different position. Play on the lower strings, higher on the neck. This will give you a tone that's a little closer to a short scale bass sound.

And of course, try the other techniques already mentioned like using the neck pickup and plucking closer to the neck rather than the bridge. Both pickups together on a Jazz might work well, too, because the parallel wiring tends to reduce the midrange a bit. And finally set the tone knob to taste.

For the past few years I've been trying to approximate a "warm" thuddy short scale sound. I've been playing in a Rolling Stones "tribute" band.

For the past 10+ years I've played "Fender" style basses (a Jazz and a G&L). I've also used a Thunderbird and an EB-0.

Trying to approximate the SS sound on the "Fender-y" instruments is pretty difficult. I'm not willing to change strings, as I view that SS sound to be a more "niche" sound that I'm not using a whole lot when not doing the Stones thing- however, I will take a wild swing and say that I believe, that even with a string change, the best you're going to do is come somewhere close to the zip code of the short scale sound.

What I have found is handy for that tone on any bass is a foam mute. Although I haven't seen pix of McCartney using a foam mute prior to 1968- you do see pix of him using a foam mute on his #1 Hofner- as in the "Revolution" film clip as well as the early Get Back sessions. My theory is that he started using the mute on his Rick and liked the sounds he got out of it and transferred that over when he started using Hofner #1 again- until it was stolen.

61hof.jpg


As far as using my Jazz- I've found it does work best to use both pickups- with the bridge slightly rolled off and the tone rolled off and picking/plucking up by the neck join. I've done a lot of playing around with mutes- and the best material I've found for it is an old neoprene rubber wristpad cut down to size.

I took these pix when I was playing around with different heights- so what you see is a couple of different slices of foam stacked on top of each other. Since I took these pix, I've since cut a different section of foam- thinner and less obtrusive looking.

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

In any case- the Jazz and the G&L really don't lend themselves to that tone- they'll work- just not as well.

OTOH, The Thunderbird and the EB-0 are good at it. The EB-0 is "best" as it is actually a short scale bass. Duh. The Thunderbird, being constructed mainly of mahogany, does have less natural ring and sustain. Again, with that- I use both pickups full on, and the tone backed off a little.

normal_T-BirdMute1.jpg


normal_T-BirdMute2.jpg


normal_T-BirdMute3.jpg



I've been playing around a little more with the EB-0, trying to figure out how well it works, vs. how I work on it. It's a really comfortable bass, but it's a different feel. For the most part- I use the Thunderbird for most shows.
 
I play bass in a Beatles trib band and I'd suggest, since you have a Fender Jazz, go for the tone he got on Beatles tunes he used a Fender Jazz on. A much better tone than his early Hofner tone. IMO.

And, tho' Paul used his thumb on a very few "mellow" tunes, in his Beatles days he most always used a pick.

I agree. Maccas early Hofner tone just wasn't all that great IMHO. In fact, in the book "Beatles Gear", there is a story about John stating that he and George wanted him to get a Gibson EB-0 bass, and quit using the Hofner.

The tone he gets with it these days is much better to me. The bass is set up, and the intonation is correct now.
 
Another easy way to get a muted sound is to just roll up a small wad of Blu Tack (or similar substance) and press it onto the strings right in front of the bridge. It's quicker and easier than worrying about cutting and fitting a piece of foam or felt.