• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Peavey DynaBass Club...

Some time ago, I sold my Red Dyna to my guitarist at the time. Kind of regretted it, as I've been Dyna-less for the last few years.

But, life is strange and wonderful.... I bought my old Dyna back from him last night!!!!

Yay!!!!! I spent all day today cleaning it and doing some repairs. It now sounds even better than it did when I first got it!
 
I bought my 1987 yesterday after having some vintage Fenders and I love it! That sound is amazing! Fat and singing. It has many battle-scars but that is ok with me.

20180823_170825.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Giffro
Like Giffro, these have been all over US Peavey Club, but here they are for this club!
Black 85 4 string, Metallic Gray 91 5er with an added green burst ring.
The 5er has to be from the very last run of the Super Ferrite equipped version, as we usually see the 2nd version with a 91 date. Giffro has the very first version of the 91, before the VFL pickups come into play.
Also, I wonder if anyone else knows of when the fingerboard radius changed on the 5 stringers. Mine has a 12" radius, which is what Peavey kept for the 2nd generation. The 87 manual for the 5 string states an 8" radius. It seems that at some point between release and 1991, the decision was made. I'd be curious if any other Super Ferrite 5 string owners have any data to figure out this detail..?
00-0bRNyLnJL0pZOju37gIGvAJPjGm5zan3rARPapS3bn37ksMWLXSrHWp8wwrTd1yfaAUrgnwgvQnZ_1RWb7NZPA
 
Didn't notice there was a Dyna Bass Club! So here is my 87 Dyna Bass Pearl white with gold hardware. Really great shape with original case. Only found small ding on lower edge by the jack. Really clean just put new set strings on couple days ago Ernie Ball roundwounds.
437361782_364184496030923_998546250857257180_n.jpg
437554336_1213404116695611_2400063679091376025_n.jpg
438032417_319443314259752_7597540025534532237_n.jpg
I ordered a new Candy Apple Red back in 1985 but let it go couple years later. I found this one at good deal so I grabbed.
 
I like when old threads get revived and model specific is fun to see all the different examples of one model.

I have 2 Dyna's this Sunfire Red with the Kahler bridge, and a Teal Blue one (pics later on).

This bass is a beast and in killer condition.

Cheers!
View attachment 5439608 View attachment 5439607 View attachment 5439606
@Bleecker The red ones go faster...so I heard lol
Great Dyna that.
It is rare to see a Dyna with the tremolo..had a pic in my Peavey Monitor collection..here's the only other one ive seen.
DYNA BASS WITH TREMOLO.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bleecker
Love my new 80s Dyna! The headstock decals are super sharp. Also came with this great old musty case. However, it came in the mail and has a couple little issues that may make me send it back.

What's everybody's experience with the preamp? mine is decidedly not flat at all! it seems to roll off some treble in the flat position.

also seems like the pickups are a little microphonic. kinda imparts a cool piezo-type quality to the tone but I'm not sure if I want that for what's supposed to be my main player...

9fd747858a87ae47e304a1768829c3a4e1fee521.jpg
28a4c64fe8de90c9a7a44d64e90961e75a1b67ed.jpg
484084da6a870715b20046bf04d45eaf0acf430f.jpg
 
Love my new 80s Dyna! The headstock decals are super sharp. Also came with this great old musty case. However, it came in the mail and has a couple little issues that may make me send it back.

What's everybody's experience with the preamp? mine is decidedly not flat at all! it seems to roll off some treble in the flat position.

also seems like the pickups are a little microphonic. kinda imparts a cool piezo-type quality to the tone but I'm not sure if I want that for what's supposed to be my main player..
I find that the preamp is pretty flat sounding (compared to passive mode) with the EQ controls set to the center detents.* I also set the active gain trim control to give the same volume level as passive mode. If anything, active mode might have a touch more sparkle since it's low impedance is not loaded down from the cable, pedals, etc...

*The treble control in active mode is flat at the center detent. However, when in passive mode, the treble knob becomes the passive tone control, which needs to be turned fully clockwise to be comparatively 'neutral' sounding.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Bleecker
I find that the preamp is pretty flat sounding (compared to passive mode) with the EQ controls set to the center detents.* I also set the active gain trim control to give the same volume level as passive mode. If anything, active mode might have a touch more sparkle since it's low impedance is not loaded down from the cable, pedals, etc...

*The treble control in active mode is flat at the center detent. However, when in passive mode, the treble knob becomes the passive tone control, which needs to be turned fully clockwise to be comparatively 'neutral' sounding.
maybe something is funny with my preamp then. Its not sounding very flat even accounting for the treble knob function change.

thanks for your reply!
 
maybe something is funny with my preamp then. Its not sounding very flat even accounting for the treble knob function change.

thanks for your reply!
Perhaps something is amiss with your preamp. I have pretty much the same bass, from 1985. I also have the 5 string version from early 1991, right before the model makeover to different electronics and general body/neck changes.
--The 85 was great from the day I got it. Just needed the pots cleaned out and then set up to my tastes. I already loved Super Ferrites, but was also impressed with the preamp. It was rather advanced for a mid 80s design--it had all the things that bassists today want: a 3 band EQ, active/passive modes, adjustable active mode gain trim, a passive tone control and doesn't have a baked-in EQ curve in active mode.
--The 91 was a basket case. It needed a LOT of work, it had pots that didn't work, missing knobs, broken tuner, needed a new active/passive switch and the neck needed a trip to warpedneck.com. Finding replacement spider pots for this preamp is next to impossible, and finding a working replacement preamp is only slightly less rare.
After a couple months of searching, I gave up and decided to roll up the sleeves. I took all of the pots off the board, took them apart, refurbished them and got a replacement switch. Luckily, it all worked and the rest of the preamp was functioning as it should.

The odd thing is the mid control, from what I understand, isn't technically 'active.' It's some sort of inductance circuit thing and doesn't require power from the battery. The bass and treble controls are proper active controls. I think this was to conserve the battery life. I do find that this preamp does eat batteries faster than any other active instrument I own. Perhaps something is off with this mid circuit? That could explain why it's not 'flat' sounding. I can assure you that active vs passive mode on these is pretty much the same tonality.
00-0bRNyLnJL0pZOju37gIGvAJPjGm5zan3rARPapS3bn37ksMWLXSrHWp8wwrTd1yfaAUrgnwgvQnZ_1RWb7NZPA
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bleecker
Perhaps something is amiss with your preamp. I have pretty much the same bass, from 1985. I also have the 5 string version from early 1991, right before the model makeover to different electronics and general body/neck changes.
--The 85 was great from the day I got it. Just needed the pots cleaned out and then set up to my tastes. I already loved Super Ferrites, but was also impressed with the preamp. It was rather advanced for a mid 80s design--it had all the things that bassists today want: a 3 band EQ, active/passive modes, adjustable active mode gain trim, a passive tone control and doesn't have a baked-in EQ curve in active mode.
--The 91 was a basket case. It needed a LOT of work, it had pots that didn't work, missing knobs, broken tuner, needed a new active/passive switch and the neck needed a trip to warpedneck.com. Finding replacement spider pots for this preamp is next to impossible, and finding a working replacement preamp is only slightly less rare.
After a couple months of searching, I gave up and decided to roll up the sleeves. I took all of the pots off the board, took them apart, refurbished them and got a replacement switch. Luckily, it all worked and the rest of the preamp was functioning as it should.

The odd thing is the mid control, from what I understand, isn't technically 'active.' It's some sort of inductance circuit thing and doesn't require power from the battery. The bass and treble controls are proper active controls. I think this was to conserve the battery life. I do find that this preamp does eat batteries faster than any other active instrument I own. Perhaps something is off with this mid circuit? That could explain why it's not 'flat' sounding. I can assure you that active vs passive mode on these is pretty much the same tonality.
00-0bRNyLnJL0pZOju37gIGvAJPjGm5zan3rARPapS3bn37ksMWLXSrHWp8wwrTd1yfaAUrgnwgvQnZ_1RWb7NZPA
thanks for your insights! Sweet lookin basses you got there.

I had my repair guy replace a lot of components and clean stuff and sure enough, the eq is working properly now. Sounds great.

The preamp is a bit noisy however, especially boosting the treble creates quite a noticeable noise floor. Anybody else experience this or find a fix for it?

And the pickups are almost definitely microphonic.. they make noise thru the amp when you tap on them and the bass sounds a bit “clanky” overall. Think I may try to wax pot them. Anybody had microphonic pickups on one of these?
 
thanks for your insights! Sweet lookin basses you got there.

I had my repair guy replace a lot of components and clean stuff and sure enough, the eq is working properly now. Sounds great.

The preamp is a bit noisy however, especially boosting the treble creates quite a noticeable noise floor. Anybody else experience this or find a fix for it?

And the pickups are almost definitely microphonic.. they make noise thru the amp when you tap on them and the bass sounds a bit “clanky” overall. Think I may try to wax pot them. Anybody had microphonic pickups on one of these?
Boosting on most any preamp will add noise, the treble band the most noisy. It's tricky, as there is a shared control in the pre. In active mode, the treble control at the center detent is flat/neutral, but in passive mode, the treble control becomes the tone control and needs to be turned all the way up to be 'neutral.'
For the most part, I just set the amp/etc... brighter downstream and use the onboard treble control mostly in the center detent or for cuts. For the rare times I boost, it's in the mix playing live, so the noise floor isn't so apparent.

As for the pickups, Super Ferrites are completely encased in epoxy and unable to be further potted without professional, archaeological level dectonstruction of the pickup.