TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Every time we get more details this amp gets sexier.Bus pumping...... Sounds oddly erotic.
Today is my new favorite amp's birthday:
![]()
Peavey MegaBass Club | TalkBass.com
That just went live on Peavey's web site. I cannot wait to get my hands on one of these. A bunch of us love the original MegaBass, so it's cool to see Peavey bringing the "Mega" name back.
If you're at NAMM, stop by and check it out so you can tell us what you think!!!!
Very excited!
--Steve
Peavey MegaBass Club #1
P.S. Here's our club thread for the original Mega:
Peavey MegaBass Club | TalkBass.com
Thanks for that description.It would be theoretically possible to put two modules in one chassis and make a power amp that was switchable between 4 and 2 channels, but in my opinion, active power factor correction would be needed to make it worthwhile.
There are a few different versions of the same module, mono (BTL), stereo, and electronically switchable between mono/stereo. The version used in the Mini Mega is locked mono. Some of the products need 500W x 2 into 4 ohms, which requires a higher rail voltage. The Mini Mega version is essentially 500W x 2 into 2 ohms since it runs 1000W BTL into 4 ohms, which requires a lower rail voltage.
BTL is one of the main contributors to mini-ness, which is probably why most micro heads run that way. The voltage rating requirement of the components is less, so physically smaller components may be used. International safety regulations specify minimum voltage spacing between circuit board traces, so lower voltage allows for increased PCB trace density. Less heat sinking is needed because there is less voltage across the MOSFET's. The MOSFET's become easier to drive at high speed, which reduces EMI and increases efficiency. The other advantage to BTL is less bus pumping that the power supply has to deal with. Bus pumping rears it's ugly head the most at low frequencies.
Maybe a difference in terminology, but I would consider the Mini Mega version to be a BTL mono block.
I want a T-45. I didn't even know it existed until recently.
Bus pumping...... Sounds oddly erotic.
So further extrapolating on this.
Both leads on the Speakon out will be "HOT" with respect to chassis ground?
I'm also assuming the other lines this module will be featured in would be things like powered PA tops? Like the molded plastic ones, they wouldn't have any EMI shielding?
I went to the Annual Tempe Guitar Show yesterday and saw a real life-living MiniMega 1000!! jhawk Customs (Greenboy Audio) had it at his booth driving one of his enclosures. It was stupid loud and clean. I didn't get a chance to talk to him, he was busy with others, but I'm guessing he picked this up at the NAMM show. The MiniMega was getting as much attention as the enclosures.
Mark
Jealous, yeah jealous.I went to the Annual Tempe Guitar Show yesterday and saw a real life-living MiniMega 1000!! jhawk Customs (Greenboy Audio) had it at his booth driving one of his enclosures. It was stupid loud and clean. I didn't get a chance to talk to him, he was busy with others, but I'm guessing he picked this up at the NAMM show. The MiniMega was getting as much attention as the enclosures.
Mark
I went to the Annual Tempe Guitar Show yesterday and saw a real life-living MiniMega 1000!! jhawk Customs (Greenboy Audio) had it at his booth driving one of his enclosures. It was stupid loud and clean. I didn't get a chance to talk to him, he was busy with others, but I'm guessing he picked this up at the NAMM show. The MiniMega was getting as much attention as the enclosures.
I'm appreciative of the exposure from jhawk and greenboy. I think we have been getting the amp in front of players who would probably never consider Peavey.
It would be theoretically possible to put two modules in one chassis and make a power amp that was switchable between 4 and 2 channels, but in my opinion, active power factor correction would be needed to make it worthwhile.
There are a few different versions of the same module, mono (BTL), stereo, and electronically switchable between mono/stereo. The version used in the Mini Mega is locked mono. Some of the products need 500W x 2 into 4 ohms, which requires a higher rail voltage. The Mini Mega version is essentially 500W x 2 into 2 ohms since it runs 1000W BTL into 4 ohms, which requires a lower rail voltage.
BTL is one of the main contributors to mini-ness, which is probably why most micro heads run that way. The voltage rating requirement of the components is less, so physically smaller components may be used. International safety regulations specify minimum voltage spacing between circuit board traces, so lower voltage allows for increased PCB trace density. Less heat sinking is needed because there is less voltage across the MOSFET's. The MOSFET's become easier to drive at high speed, which reduces EMI and increases efficiency. The other advantage to BTL is less bus pumping that the power supply has to deal with. Bus pumping rears it's ugly head the most at low frequencies.
Maybe a difference in terminology, but I would consider the Mini Mega version to be a BTL mono block.
I want a T-45. I didn't even know it existed until recently.
How's the Minimega hold up, then?
Danke schoën.