Go with the arctic white, IMO. No point in trying to make it look vintage, that's not what you're going for, right?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
This is looking really nice! Is it going to be bolt on or set neck?
I would just about rather go with an Eastern Soft Maple body (Acer rubrum). It looks pretty close to the same, and weighs a lot less. And since you'll be painting it anyway....
Edit:
I think I'd make a new body using that one as a template.
I think you can salvage it. Cut off the too short neck extension that is already on the body. Rout out the back of the body so you can glue in a neck pocket extension, of the same thickness of the bottom of the pocket. The fact that it extends into the back of the body should give it plenty of strength.
I'm not sure if I'm echoing what Hopkins said here (if I am sorry) but what if you just shorten the area that is supposed to go in the pocket, that makes the "neck" (playable part) longer as well and you'll have more access to the upper register.
The problem I would see with this idea though would be a smaller amount of contact from neck to body, which could lead to neck shift later on.
I hear what you're saying Ivan, but if I do what Hopkins is suggesting (which I probably will), then I'll be lengthening the tang anyway, which means I'll have neck to body contact all the way up to where the neck starts tapering (I forget what you call that part--the "heel", maybe?).