I have limited funds, so this is a serious matter. I don't know enough yet to make a well informed decision, so can you guys help me decide whether a fretless bass is a worthwhile investment? I decided to buy a bass after suddenly "hearing" Jaco Pastorius playing on some songs I heard years ago - I just never noticed how important his bass part is.
I chose a decent fretted bass in my price range (on sale for $350 new) because I think it's too difficult to learn to play from scratch without benefit of frets, AND develop my ear for precise pitch/intonation at the same time. I figure, learn the basics on fretted and then transfer them to mastering the more difficult (more versatile) fretless bass.
So I'm a month in with my fretted bass, and found a deal on the fretless version of it (again $350). I placed the order online, knowing the item is out-of-stock until June - so I have time to think about whether to cancel or not...
I hear amazing fretless solo work on YouTube, etc. and I want to create that wide variety of sounds, but I'm not likely to ever be a SOLO bassist. And while I might learn to imitate some of Jaco's sound, I accept that I am JacoNOT (not even JacoLITE
). My primary goal is to become proficient and clean for playing on demo tunes where the bass is one of six core instrument types:
I used to compose from the top down, beginning with guitar and vocal. Now I'm composing from the bottom up, beginning with the rhythm section. So the bass will be featured prominently in some compositions, but in general I expect to treat it as a member of the rhythm section.
THE BIG QUESTION:
Will the uniqueness and versatility of FRETLESS be wasted (go unnoticed):
1) If the bass stays in it's traditional rhythm section role in the mix, and
2) If I'm merely proficient, not a standout fretless player?
My current fretted bass is already helping me hear and write musical passages that are very different from what I do on guitar. Do you guys think the extended capabilities of the fretless bass would be even more inspiring (it's almost a "vocal" sound sometimes)? Or am I just getting carried away with "buying basses"?
Thanks
I chose a decent fretted bass in my price range (on sale for $350 new) because I think it's too difficult to learn to play from scratch without benefit of frets, AND develop my ear for precise pitch/intonation at the same time. I figure, learn the basics on fretted and then transfer them to mastering the more difficult (more versatile) fretless bass.
So I'm a month in with my fretted bass, and found a deal on the fretless version of it (again $350). I placed the order online, knowing the item is out-of-stock until June - so I have time to think about whether to cancel or not...
I hear amazing fretless solo work on YouTube, etc. and I want to create that wide variety of sounds, but I'm not likely to ever be a SOLO bassist. And while I might learn to imitate some of Jaco's sound, I accept that I am JacoNOT (not even JacoLITE
- drums/percussion
- bass
- keyboard/piano
- synth, various applications
- electric guitar
- acoustic guitar
- (vocals, lead and backing)
- bass
- keyboard/piano
- synth, various applications
- electric guitar
- acoustic guitar
- (vocals, lead and backing)
I used to compose from the top down, beginning with guitar and vocal. Now I'm composing from the bottom up, beginning with the rhythm section. So the bass will be featured prominently in some compositions, but in general I expect to treat it as a member of the rhythm section.
THE BIG QUESTION:
Will the uniqueness and versatility of FRETLESS be wasted (go unnoticed):
1) If the bass stays in it's traditional rhythm section role in the mix, and
2) If I'm merely proficient, not a standout fretless player?
My current fretted bass is already helping me hear and write musical passages that are very different from what I do on guitar. Do you guys think the extended capabilities of the fretless bass would be even more inspiring (it's almost a "vocal" sound sometimes)? Or am I just getting carried away with "buying basses"?
Thanks
