TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Psycho Bass Guy said:To the best of my knowledge, the SVT VR uses the power section of the SVT CL, and is NOT as close a copy of the original as possible in that respect, unlike its preamp. There's a big difference between the original SVT and the CL's power section which I've discussed in depth here before.
Psycho Bass Guy said:There are some very real issues with the SVT VR versus its vintage counterparts aside from where it may be being made. To the best of my knowledge, the SVT VR uses the power section of the SVT CL, and is NOT as close a copy of the original as possible in that respect, unlike its preamp. There's a big difference between the original SVT and the CL's power section which I've discussed in depth here before. While the SVT VR may have the preamp tone, it's not EXACTLY like the old hoss and that's important to remember.
Another issue is the cabinet. I cannot STAND modern SVT810E's (which include the "AV" line as well). Even with my gigging old SVT, playing through a new 810E I was NOT a happy camper. The tone was wooly, underfined, and very bandwidth limited, ALL low mid honk with little of the girth, depth, and growl my old SVT (and Nemesis 810, BTW) cabs provide.
I'm glad to see another fair review of the amp here rather than the cheerleader pieces you see elsewhere. Also, given Loud's decision to manufacture overseas, you also have to look into the worth of any warranty and the roadworthiness of the amp. Personally, I recommend anyone interested in the way an SVT is SUPPOSED to sound to seek out a vintage head AND cab and spend your money on something that has proven itself rather than put money in the pockets of Loud. I renew my call for a boycott of all Ampeg/Loud products.
Tim Cole said:Indeed, to each their own. I love the 810e with other heads actually....even my ex cheapo ashdown mag head. The VR sounded vintage, just not my cup of tea I guess. I dug it, but not enough to go dumping my other gear and spending that kind of scratch on it.
Then again, we weren't exactly using vintage pieces to test the amp either....we used an active Sadowsky, and a Modulus Flea with the lane poor. Believe it or not, the Sadowsky was 1000x brighter than the Mod....which is saying a lot. Not sure I have ever heard a brighter bass actually. Personally, I don't think we had ideal instruments for testing such an amp/cab.
kdogg said:Good Lord cheezewiz, where did you get that avatar?I must have the full screen version of that pic!


Tim Cole said:I tried talking them into letting me take it to the gig friday, but no-go lol. It's in findlay, and I am positive I could get someone a scortching good deal on it if someone local were want it.
tombowlus said:Based upon yours, Pat's and Psycho's comments, I may just hold out for a nice vintage SVT (which I have tried and really like). Still, it would be nice to hear the VR sometime. Oh, and you and Pat still suck.![]()
cheezewiz said:Tom.. it was a last minute idea to run over to Findlay Friday.
I'll definitely call ya next time we go!

Opas said:PBG, if a vintage SVT and cab are out of the question, what would be the best and closest modern equivalent?
Jona-s said:Question. Is there any difference in sound if you compare SVT-VR and SVT-AV? Someone told me that VR just looks like the old SVT but, the sound is the same as in SVT-AVand yet it costs like 400 euros more around here
![]()
cheezewiz said:Man, you gals are touchy. I think it's a great head. Just not for me right now. If I was Pino doing WHO tours, that head would be my FIRST stop.