Funkize you said:That is a better answer. IT SUX dosent really hold water...
that's funny - I hadn't realized I used language like that....

TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Funkize you said:That is a better answer. IT SUX dosent really hold water...

SteelBoy19 said:eyescream does yout Ibanez detune easily or not? Can it stand a 3 hour gig without tuning?
dgce said:Hey cgworkman,
Don't sweat it pal. Yr comments were right on the money even if some disagree (which they're entitled to). I guess my point is...people, lighten up; the guy didn't tap dance on a Bible or anything. Good thing this isn't a political forum; things really could get ugly.
r


cgworkman said:If you can't understand that simple truth then I don't know what to tell you........
![]()
SteelBoy19 said:If you ever visit my country let me know, beer is on me!![[]]'s
Funkize you said:Yes like I said "Peavey Has two good basses, the Cirrus is one of them" they have a Bunch of Basses, Guitars, Amps, Heads, all the gear you could think of, and it all sucks, except for the Cirrus.
Funkize you said:No offense intended of course, its just that here, most people are used to a mini-review of why you didnt like THAT instrument, just saying its terrible leaves it all up to interpretation, and when you read it, it makes you sound like you really dont have a clue. (I do it too once in awhile, everyone does...)
Good Times
-Tim
![]()

What you actually said was, "I recently played a Yamaha bass and it was terrible. I'm not sure why because Yamaha made decent instruments in the past ...", implying that Yamaha doesn't make decent instruments any more. All this, based on your impression of a single instrument.cgworkman said:Then some of you seem to lose any maturity you might have by simply going off because I said something negative about one Yamaha model. The posting I was responding to was a simple one - as was my reply.
Funkize you said:I do really like it! Its a great bass (For me) but if you have $1,300 I would not buy a Yamaha, While it is a good bass, you can get a MUCH better bass for around the same price...
.
Funkize you said:You can get a MUCH better bass for around the same price...
Munjibunga said:What you actually said was, "I recently played a Yamaha bass and it was terrible. I'm not sure why because Yamaha made decent instruments in the past ...", implying that Yamaha doesn't make decent instruments any more. All this, based on your impression of a single instrument.
cgworkman said:I'm not implying anything. But when a company is charging $1300 for an instrument that has the quality of $300 or $400 max (opinion) - you kind of wonder what they're trying to pull. If you walked into a store and payed top dollar for **insert product here** you would be as ticked as i was (opinion) to find that when you compared quality vs. price that you'd been screwed (opinion).
Like I said - if i'd paid $300-$400 I would have been ecstatic.
It's simply the principle of the whole thing. I was considering a TRB5 - but I probably won't purchase one because if the consumer is being shanked (opinion) on a product that's worth $400 (max) (opinion) and is being charged $1300 - that's kind of hard for me to handle. You have to be able to trust the product you are purchasing. I expect to get what I pay for. No more, no less. If you claim otherwise - then I'd have to call you a liar.
Someone said earlier that Yamaha is a mass producer and that they have instrumets in all price ranges. Well DUH!!! I think everyone knows this (opinion). But don't charge $1300 for something that has the quality and playability of a sweat shop made $300 bass (opinion).
I'm sure someone will puke up some excuse to disagree with me - but if you'd been the one who had enormously overpaid (opinion) - you'd be saying the same thing I am...(opinion)
Good day folks...