• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

POLL: BOYS IN SKIRTS?

Is wearing a skirt to school a legitimate form of protest for sweltering lads denied shorts?

  • These young men are heroes!

    Votes: 48 78.7%
  • Get of my lawn with this this abomination!

    Votes: 8 13.1%
  • Carrots (explain)

    Votes: 5 8.2%

  • Total voters
    61
Are you sure they aren't just Scottish?

School uniforms kinda suck, but if you are going to one of those fancy schools, you have to deal with that. The article said "As the temperature soared past 30C earlier this week," which is 86f. No sympathy from me. It has been over 100 for a week straight now and I'm not allowed to wear shorts to work. Life is uncomfortable, deal with it.
I don't know if the fact that their protest includes skirts bothers me. Forcing girls to wear those little skirts is a little questionable in its own right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Son of Wobble
When I used to work in an office environment, I often though how different dress codes were for women compared to men. They could wear skirts, showing their legs, sleeveless tops, showing their arms, a scooped style collar, that showed some chest, and, at least at my various jobs, opened toed and open heeled shoes.

I'm not talking mini skirts, or super cleavage tops, or flip flops, but still, much more of their body could be exposed.

As a man, if I wore anything that showed my legs (shorts), a sleeveless shirt, or a shirt with a V neck with no under shirt under it, or a pair of sandals, I would be sent home for being dressed inappropriately.

Definitely a double standard.

I'm OK with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GKon
No, it's a skirt, a kilt was one piece of fabric three or four meters long that was wrapped around your body and over a shoulder and held in place with a pin. Modern kilts are skirts with a different name so men won't feel feminized. Which actually makes no sense at all sense pants didn't get introduced to the western world until the Romans tangled with the cavalrymen of eastern Europe and adopted their clothing (pants) for equestrian activities.
You're apparently not very familiar with the Prince Charlie. If you want to call it a skirt, that's fine, but you're wrong.... it is a kilt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThudThudThud
The blue baseball cap doesn't go with the skirt. He needs a plaid cap. Where did they get those skirts anyway? Did their parents go out and but them for using for just one day's use?
They do all have the proper black shoes though.
Spoken like a purist. I raise a carrot to your rigorous and righteous logic.
 
'Tez, that.

I've worn my kilt on stage a few times. I'll tell you, 9 yards of wool isn't the best idea under the lights.
I made my first kilt and used cotton for that very reason.

Pro: light weight
Con: doesn't hold pleats, and, being so thin, your man parts poke through quite noticeably. You have to wear a sporan, or some other such item.
 
  • Like
Reactions: murphy