steve21 said:You hear Manring and Garrison on the radio?
What kind of awesome radio station do you use?
http://www.attentionspanradio.net/
In the car KNPR
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
steve21 said:You hear Manring and Garrison on the radio?
What kind of awesome radio station do you use?
bassksun said:![]()
No waaayyyy. Try something less personal. I never criticize TB'ers work even in jest.
Why not? You slamed Brunel, Willis, Garrison, and Manring pretty hard.bassksun said:![]()
No waaayyyy. Try something less personal. I never criticize TB'ers work even in jest.
Craig Garfinkel said:Let's try an experiment basskun, to see what you're getting at. Check out the link in my signature to the myspace page for the Mike Bradley Project. Play the song entitled "Rolling". Tell me what you think about the bass playing and let me know what you hear influence-wise in my playing. You can fast forward to 4:16 where there's a short bass solo.
You can certainly tell by my fairly detailed profile (ehem) what my influences are, but I'll tell you in further detail if you're interested after you listen.
Chunk-O-Funk said:Why not? You slamed Brunel, Willis, Garrison, and Manring pretty hard.
Of course they are not members here. Or are they?
bassksun said:Speaking of Mr. Manring. If you get a chance to see his interview in Bass Day 98 he talks about his development and how much Jaco influenced him. IIRC he didn't care about his "own sound" just Jaco's.
Craig Garfinkel said:I'm not asking you to play critic, but rather just make an honest assessment as to whether or not you hear any clear influences. PM me if you'd rather keep your opinion private.
I'm not being contentious here. I feel that Jaco's influence on my sound and playing as a bassist are fairly significant. I hope his influence on me as a musician has been significant. What I'm curious about is if you can hear anything in my playing that makes you think "okay, here's another one".
As for being personal, you're not afraid to attempt to support your opinion with some very personal statements regarding players like Willis and Garrison as to their motivations and personal paths to musicianship, quite erroneously IMO. Actually I should say IME as I have taken lessons
with both and know quite a bit about their backgrounds, influences and current approaches to being musicians.
Richard Lindsey said:Only thing is, even if that's true that he said that (about which I'm skeptical), he very obviously has his own sound now. Again, being influenced doesn't mean you don't have your own sound. The fact that Manring does disproves your argument.
As for being post-Jacoists, we're ALL post-Jacoists, if you think about it.
bassksun said:Was not a SLAM!
Clearly all of those players are demigods. In fact, they are The Post-Jacoists (except for Garrison more about him later.). This thread is not about slamming anyone.
Speaking of Mr. Manring. If you get a chance to see his interview in Bass Day 98 he talks about his development and how much Jaco influenced him. IIRC he didn't care about his "own sound" just Jaco's.
This thread is not about a criticism of individuals and their skills. I've already stated that learning the Jaco-sound is a technique we should learn if we choose to. Most, if not all of us are influenced by Jaco to some degree. That's ok with me. But it doesn't HAVE to be all the time and so obvious. Like putting salt on everything.
This thread is about bassists moving on. This thread is about having had enough of Jacoisms in every other "Jazz" composition.
We could spend gigs of space playing war of "this player vs. that player" (and that happens around TB all of the time) or "here's a tune that proves you wrong" but tht is not what this is about. It is about the discussion and about ideas. My little rant was intended to provoke discussion about our artform. Not a flame-thrower.

bassksun said:Now why would I lie???![]()
I wish I could post the DVD.
Yes in the broader sense of the term we are all post-Jacoists simply because we follow him in time.
I needed a category to squeeze those artists into for a little clarity.
And as far as "influence" is concerned; many of us are influnced to a greater or lesser degree. It is the greater degree that I have issues with. The Jaco-sound technologists for Jaco-sound's sake.
This disproves what? "That to play like Jaco you will sound like Jaco." ? That if you stay stuck on Jaco then Jaco will be stuck on you?
Chunk-O-Funk said:Okay, well thanks for clearing that up.
Your original post had a certain tone to it and really made you sound as if you were annoyed that these bassist sounded like Jaco and they lacked originality because of an obvious influence.
bassksun said:Yes in the broader sense of the term we are all post-Jacoists simply because we follow him in time.
Richard Lindsey said:It disproves this argument:
"I stand by my point when the artist uses the Jaco sound they reference Jaco. Not the musical idea. Nor do they reference their self."
That singing fretless sound was a big part of what Jaco added to the vocabulary. Again, you seem to be saying, it's OK to be influenced by Jaco as long as you don't actually use the stuff he added to the toolbox. I ask you, what sense would that make?
Apply your argument to Jamerson. he also changed the way the electric bass guitar was played. Are we not supposed to use anything Jamerson contributed?
And I'm not calling you a liar. Where on earth do you get that? You YOURSELF said "IIRC"--"if I recall correctly." Meaning you don't even know if you're recalling correctly. My suggestion is that perhaps you're not recalling correctly. Getting from that to saying you're lying is a big leap, and one you shouldn't make.
If your point was simply that a little copping is fine but too much is too much, then fine. But I submit that you're using the wrong people as examples. You picked precisely some of the bassists who've done the most to digest Jaco's contribution and then move on and do their own thing with it (along with other elements of their style). IOW, the ones who are least likely to be slavish Jaco copiers. That tends to dilute your point a great deal, IMO.
Richard Lindsey said:No, that's not it. We are all post-Jacoists because we live in a bassplaying world whose boundaries and parameters were changed by what Jaco did. IOW, he enlarged the language or vocabulary available to bass players. It's important to understand that this is true regardless of whether any given player chooses to use what he added to the toolbox or not.
