deepestend
Commercial User
- Feb 21, 2003
- 6,249
- 8,171
- Disclosures
- Website and Social Media at Sadowsky
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I cant compare cl to ghs but i have played the 55-105 fender and ghs and there was a very big difference in tension.Long time Chromes player here (.050-.105) and currently using Fender 9050 CL's on my '62 P bass replica. I like the Fenders but am desiring something with more fundamental thumpy tone. I have read a couple of reviews in which the GHS 3050's (.055-.105) are not as stiff as the Fender 9050CL's. Has anyone else found this to be true?
Long time Chromes player here (.050-.105) and currently using Fender 9050 CL's on my '62 P bass replica. I like the Fenders but am desiring something with more fundamental thumpy tone. I have read a couple of reviews in which the GHS 3050's (.055-.105) are not as stiff as the Fender 9050CL's. Has anyone else found this to be true?
Without naming names, I played a number of flats prior to working here, and due to the tension just figured that I wasn't a "flats guy."
Tried the P Flats last September for a 6 week theatre run, and was amazed at how supple they felt in comparison to my previous experiences.
Without naming names, I played a number of flats prior to working here, and due to the tension just figured that I wasn't a "flats guy."
Tried the P Flats last September for a 6 week theatre run, and was amazed at how supple they felt in comparison to my previous experiences.
I just found the tension guide on the 3050's.....HOLY CRAP!!!! am I in for trouble? You mentioned they are "supple".....might they be "round core" string?
I just found the tension guide on the 3050's.....HOLY CRAP!!!! am I in for trouble? You mentioned they are "supple".....might they be "round core" string?
Nope, they're hex. It's all in the winding. You should be fine, but would probably need a trussrod tweak.
Just remember (and this is a good example), "tension does not always equate to the "feel" of the string.
My beloved Dean Markley flats are discontinued. Does anyone know if the GHS Precision Flats would be the closet thing for a P-bass?
Side note: If GHS ever discontinues their Pressurewounds, I'm going on a 3-state killing spree. Best strings for a Jazz.
the P Flats are one of our top selling items.
Precision flats or Pressurewounds are one of the best selling?
Ok, just don't let those pressurewounds disappear. Great string.
Problem i have with these flats is the d and g take sooo long to break in and they sound horribly unbalanced for a long time.
But when broken in after a handful of months they do sound amazing. Thump masters.
Glad I just found this thread.
I've used TI's and Chromes on numerous basses on the past, but never really kept them on for too long, as I prefer round wounds.
Yesterday I felt like a change and with a string missing for my TI set, and the Chromes on another bass I thought I'd try a set of these.
I love the feel, and the tension, and I'm very impressed with the thump.
What I was dissapointed with was the D and G. The G seems very loud compared to the other strings, and the D is a lot clearer than the E and A.
I'm figured this must be normal but came checking, just in case I had to ask. It seems I don't and things will settle down. My issue is I don't have 100 hours to play them in, with only about 15 gigs this year and no rehearsals booked I'm hoping things settle in a lot quicker.
This is only through my zoom B3 and headphones though I'm not really worried about it through my rig. My g tends to get lost sometimes anyway! as I play with a pick.
Not too dissapointed with them though, I know they will stay on my PJ for a good few gigs at least.