• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Probably over-posted question...

this question probably gets asked all the time, but there is no way in hell i'm going to wade through 6 whole pages of threads to find out :D

But anyways, should I (or my band) invest in getting our own studio setup, or should we just pay to go to a studio?

what are the advantages/disadvantages of each (obviously home studio costs more, have to learn how to use everything, etc.)?

i just want to know if it's worth the trouble, and if it pays off in the long run.
 
That really depends on why you want to record.

If you need to record your band with sufficient quality to get anywhere near commercial recordings (for example, for distributing your stuff online), then you may need to spend quite a lot of money on a set-up of your own, not to mention the time you'd need to spend learning how to use it all properly. Come to think of it, you'd need to spend a fair bit of money in a commercial studio too. Quality in this respect does cost, whichever route you choose.

On the other hand, if you want to record your stuff for, say, your own enjoyment (both of the process and the results), sharing with friends or for collaborating on material, then with some compromise on quality you can still get very good results with your own set-up, if you take time and care with how you use it.

I hope that helps. :)
 
Unless you're gonna be putting out a CD every two months, I think going into an established studio with an experienced engineer is best the way to go.

The thing you see in a decent studio that you normally don't in a home or garage studio are the professional standard mics and outboard gear. And a guy who (theoretically) really knows how to use them. And is also an experienced (again, theoretically), independent set of ears.

I'll add that my comments are from the viewpoint of recording release quality stuff.
 
Getting stuff that will produce a demo quality product can be had pretty cheap.

Getting stuff that will produce a cd quality product will cost some money.

Getting your own stuff:
Pros:
Once you buy it, you have it.
Allows more flexibility with time, and more control over the product.

Cons:
HIGH Initial cost, not only money but time having to learn the nuances of whatever gear you get, and learning the recording program you use.
Depending on your experience, you might not produce a good quality product because your ear might not be as tuned to producing a good mix.
If it breaks, you have to pay to fix it.

Going to a studio:
Pros:
No mess no fuss. You don't have to worry about fixing a piece of gear that might mess up. Just show up, plug in, and play.
Depending on the studio, you will hopefully have someone experienced with their gear. They might also have amps and drums and stuff they know sound good with their stuff.

Cons:
Time... most studios charge per hour, which can cause stress and limit creative potential because your trying to get out quick.
High residual cost: you pay per hour or song. So if you want to record more, you pay for it. If you want to do another album after the first, you pay for it.
You have to deal with the studio guy's ear. Which might not yield the mix you want.
 
I don't think it'll cost much to set up your own. If you've already got all the stuff you need for a good live sound, and a decent computer, then all you really need is a decent audio interface for about £200 or so. That should give you good enough quality for anything that you don't need a recording deal for!
 
My band was facing the same question awhile back. Go into the studio for about a grand for a five song demo or do it ourselves. We went with option B and I am having the time of my life. It's time consuming, to be sure. We did a couple things one way, then learned better ways, so went back and re-did stuff, etc. But we've learned so much, and when we're done we'll have a full length (10-plus tunes) album that we'll be really happy with. And the opportunities to always go back and fix/change stuff are great (almost too great- sometimes you just gotta put it to bed). For instance, you never realized this one cool thing the guitarist does in the solo, you go back and punch in your bass to mimic it here. Or put a little effect on the vocals there. Or wouldn't it be killer if we added some bongos under the acoustic guitar here. Or whatever. It's been a total blast. We had the hardware and software, it was just a matter of figuring it out. We do the drums live in our rehearsal space, vocals in the bathroom, bass and guitar at the space or in the apartment or wherever. I can't wait until I get to post the "hey listen to my band" thread- we're really proud of how it turned out.

And the best part is that now we can just record new songs as we go (we've stopped playing out to focus on this one). No need to think in terms of albums, write a new tune, work it out at a couple gigs, record and throw it up online. In my past experience I was always unhappy with a couple little things right after a studio demo was done, and you'd outgrow as a band so quickly. You don't want to be listening to it a year from now thinking 'oh we do this so much better now.' Do it yourself, it's the way to go. Time consuming, but so worth it.
 
TC- not sure if your question there is directed at me, but like I said, we had the hardware and software, and we begged, borrowed and stole whatever else we needed. Look through the stickies and other threads to see what you need. I don't know what your situation is, but if you know some other bands around or know some studios or other people in the biz, I'm sure you'll be able to get up and running cheaply. It's well worth it in the long run.