The Sarzo model also had the oval inlays, and I have seen inside of one control cavity that said Dyna Bass on the circuit board.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Some dynas were active, as you mention; others were passive, like the koa p-j shown above. Some of these show up for sale with EMG or Bart pups and preamps added. Also, the passive p-js have a record of having the stock pups fall apart (the bobbins drop back into the shells).Blackbird said:I used to own a 5 string TL bass and the stock electronics were identical to those of a Dyna Bass. It even had "Dyna Bass" printed on the circuitboard.
Kind of. The early Dyna bolt-ons had a painted neck where the Foundation always had a matte finish neck. Most of the four string Dynas had the P/J pickups which IMO didn't sound as good as the "Super Ferrite" pickups on the Foundations and 5 string Dynas IMO. I don't think the Foundations had Schaller hardware, the Dynas had upgraded bridge and tuners. I think the five string Dynas like mine had the exact same "Super Ferrite" pickups as the 4 and 5 string Foundations. I remember my Dyna always had a problem with a quiet "G" string, the string was right over the edge of the pickup.Is the Dynabass a Foundation with active elec. and gold hdware ?
So do I.... But I have 6.I really only need one bass right now.
My advice: Keep them both!jimfriar said:Thanks for all the posts guys - it helps alot. I am trying to make a decision between 2 basses - the Dyna - which
I didn't pay much for and is a great player/sounder and I wouldn't care if I dinged or dented it and my Lado Standard - which is a recent model - cost $1200 - is mint, natural finish , neck thru - EMG's - also a great player and sounder - but I am a little worried about damaging. I really only need one bass right now.