• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Question about silks at the bridge

Saw this today.

dez9tjex7fjxcvd7u55e.jpg


This is just a stock photo. Shouldn't the silk winding be fully behind the saddle? If what's happening in this photo were real life, wouldn't you want to cut the silk back on the E and A strings? Or am I just confused?
 
Saw this today.

View attachment 4523497

This is just a stock photo. Shouldn't the silk winding be fully behind the saddle? If what's happening in this photo were real life, wouldn't you want to cut the silk back on the E and A strings? Or am I just confused?
I would say it's a poorly designed bridge.

The silk is usually wound around where the string core is twisted back on itself to hold the ball end captive. If this twisted portion is resting on the saddle, silk or no silk, it's not good for intonation, how the string vibrates, and the general playability of the instrument.

If it was my bass, I'd be getting rid of that bridge.
 
I would say it's a poorly designed bridge.

The silk is usually wound around where the string core is twisted back on itself to hold the ball end captive. If this twisted portion is resting on the saddle, silk or no silk, it's not good for intonation, how the string vibrates, and the general playability of the instrument.

If it was my bass, I'd be getting rid of that bridge.

Apparently I need more coffee, because I should have thought of that. Yeah, there's no way I'm buying an instrument I know 100% requires a bridge replacement. Hipshot Super Tone addresses this problem. Great callout. Thanks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MAJOR METAL
For some mysterious reason the Hipshot bridge is only a little better in this regard.

On my bass with the above type of bridge I use one nut (#6?) and two washers (#6?) per string, with the nut toward the ball.
They're the kind of nuts that have one end rounded, and the rounded end fits into the bridge nicely.

Yes, it's a careless design, but if I want this specific tone I wouldn't let it stop me from buying this kind of bass.

*
Last time I looked the "mod bar" was out of production.
 
It's been a while, but I've definitely seen bent-plate Fender bridges that have saddles sitting right under the silks to intonate acceptably for some strings. Usually it's the low E that is the offender but it happens much less now with far more consistent string making.

That stock photo, though, doesn't really look like a typical intonated specimen to me. Most of the time, I see the saddles clear the silks when set up properly.
 
I own a Gibson Thunderbird & an Epiphone EB1, so I’ve been there.

Small nuts or machine bushings on the strings will pull the ball end back enough to get the silk behind the saddle contact point on “most” strings. The nut or bushing hides behind the curl-back piece of the bridge well enough it’s not noticeable.

Per those that have tested out the Ray Ross saddle-less bridge, the silk on the vibrating length of the string is much too small to affect the intonation. I’m not one of those testers, so I only know of that by reading.

“Most” strings with silk at the ball end don’t actually use the silk to hold the ball in the end loop, so those strings can have the silk shortened with a razor blade. The ball end loop is usually held in place by another layer of the outer winding.
 
I've not found a significant impact on intonation with this configuration.
The whole point of intonation adjustment is to compensate for the stiffness at the nodal points (fret and bridge) anyway, so a bit of added mass very close to the bridge can be compensated, too.

The bridge itself isn't the best design, though. I adjust mine close to parallel to the body, so the string tension doesn't pull it upwards at the tails.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MAJOR METAL
Saw this today.

View attachment 4523497

This is just a stock photo. Shouldn't the silk winding be fully behind the saddle? If what's happening in this photo were real life, wouldn't you want to cut the silk back on the E and A strings? Or am I just confused?
The strings are made how they're made. The saddles are moved where the instrument is intonated. It ends up where it ends up. If that's a problem for you, buy strings that don't have silk on them.
 
The strings are made how they're made. The saddles are moved where the instrument is intonated. It ends up where it ends up. If that's a problem for you, buy strings that don't have silk on them.

It's way easier than that. Like on guitar, I'll just continue to avoid anything associated with Gibson like it's the plague. :thumbsup:
 
Last edited: