Me too. Looking forward to this one.I gave in a pulled the trigger on one. The Black Friday price was too good to pass up.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Me too. Looking forward to this one.I gave in a pulled the trigger on one. The Black Friday price was too good to pass up.
I think the P-bass is a common reference, therefore understandable why you often see one in demo videos.Was this amp designed specifically with the p bass in mind? I love the muted P with flats sound as much as the next guy, but is that all this amp can do? Admittedly from the videos it does that well.
Thats great, thanks! Unfortunately delivery has been delayed until Monday so I won't get to try it at band practice this weekend. Looking forward to running through it.I think the P-bass is a common reference, therefore understandable why you'd often see one in demo videos.
Just for the record, the basses I've used thru my 803 now include:
P-basses (Road Worn and '62)
Lakland Skyline Darryl Jones 4 (Jazz clone)
MTD 6-string
Stingray V
Bluesman Vintage El Dorado V (Jazz)
It sounds equally great with all of them.
Different cabs too: Mesa Subway 212, EA VL-110 (x2), EA VL-210 - all good.
Having second thoughts, worked with this amp again and its really pretty special. So am going to put theGot mine yesterday, I have an amp that I love )Fuchs FBS 700) but really wanted to try out the v803 to see if it would give me a bit more versatility. I did an A/B test today - I have two of the same cabinets and an ABY pedal, so it was easy to do a thorough comparison. Very impressed with the v803 - very clean when set flat, but takes eq tweaks very well. The Voice switch differences are subtle but definitely usable.
After an hour os so of use, I've decided that the Fuchs is the keeper. If I didnt already have the Fuchs, the 803 would stay, but I don't need both. I thought that I'd put a feeler on this thread before putting the Quilter up on the classifieds. I purchased the v803 at the BF price with a Quilter bag, I'm willing to pass it along to someone at that price and I'll eat shipping ($630 including the bag). Only out of the box for an hour to do my side-by-side. PM me if you are interested.
Do you still have a RevSound RS115?Having second thoughts, worked with this amp again and its really pretty special. So am going to put the
Fuchs up on the block, if it doesnt sell I have another week to send the Quilter back and keep the Fuchs. Either would meet my needs, but the Quilter is a bit more versatile and I love the small form factor!
No, I have a pair of RevSound 112s - I actually preferred the 12s to the 15, at least when using just one. Great combo with the 803Do you still have a RevSound RS115?
If so, how does that sound with the V803?
I don't recall, but did you (do you) use the 803 with double bass?Having second thoughts, worked with this amp again and its really pretty special. So am going to put the
Fuchs up on the block, if it doesnt sell I have another week to send the Quilter back and keep the Fuchs. Either would meet my needs, but the Quilter is a bit more versatile and I love the small form.
Only tired it for a bit and it seems fine, had a finger injury on my right hand so not playing much atm. I used to have an 800 and liked it alot with DB, but basically used it like a power amp with preamp in front.I don't recall, but did you (do you) use the 803 with double bass?
Presumably, some folks prefer a scooped tone/sound, and it's an easy and fast way to accomplish that. Personally, I also prefer the flat input, but different strokes for different folks, I guess.I'm starting to come around on the flat input and starting to actually wonder why the true purpose of the scooped input really is?
My understanding is the scoop input converts the EQ into something closer to Fender tonestack. I haven't had an opportunity to hear it in a loud mix yet. I may prefer the flat input at gig volume.I'm starting to come around on the flat input and starting to actually wonder why the true purpose of the scooped input really is?
I still wonder why is it a second input, and not a switch though.Presumably, some folks prefer a scooped tone/sound, and it's an easy and fast way to accomplish that. Personally, I also prefer the flat input, but different strokes for different folks, I guess.
It's funny because I really dislike the Fender tonestack (at least in all the Rumble amps I've played), but I like the 803's scooped input, even at high volume. I don't think it sounds like a Fender. I think it sounds more like a SVT (especially with the Qtube setting).My understanding is the scoop input converts the EQ into something closer to Fender tonestack. I haven't had an opportunity to hear it in a loud mix yet. I may prefer the flat input at gig volume.
I still wonder why is it a second input, and not a switch though.
Is there any kind of technical reason, or is it a sort of strange "smart reasoning" on Pat Quilter's side, like for example "we have to offer two inputs anyway, and we want to offer a new 'scooped' profile, so let's make 2 in 1".
There are a lot of small other details like this in the amp that are very well thought out, like the ability to use the FX return for as an aux input, so it could be an attempt at being smart regarding the scooped input, but I still think it would be more practicle to use a simple switch.
Anybody knows or guesses why they did it that way?