I love how catty this thread has become.
And you expected it to go differently?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I love how catty this thread has become.
You just go ahead make out loud assumptions. Just because I'm a witness to what's the truth you can spin it anyway you want. People might have never even heard of a P-15 before this thread? I can believe that those tuning in are clicking on links to the Broughton right now than the REDDI. Exposure is still exposure.This is the kind of promo that most companies don't like to see, and I'm guessing you're not doing any favors for whoever makes the P-15. You're not convincing anyone of anything and only helping to foster a adversarial situation.
The level of subjectivity in why people favor one unit or another is obvious. Not everyone wants a DI that sounds like a B15, or an Ampeg, or even a REDDI.
As always people on TB take 'their answer' to be the only answer. It isn't.
In running both Monique Tube DI and U5 in a recent session, it was surprising how similar rather than different they were. I prefer the Monique because of some of the character to what it does...which the engineer/producer on the project read as 'some blurring or distortion really down deep'. I have no doubt that when it comes to it, he'll probably use the U5 track because producers favor certain things no matter how good other things are and tend to work by habit.People get infatuated with things and don't like to venture off that path.
People may also not understand that when you get to a certain level of gear, the law of diminishing returns kicks in. It doesn't mean that the extra cost isn't worth it, it just is what it is.
In running both Monique Tube DI and U5 in a recent session, it was surprising how similar rather than different they were. I prefer the Monique because of some of the character to what it does...which the engineer/producer on the project read as 'some blurring or distortion really down deep'. I have no doubt that when it comes to it, he'll probably use the U5 track because producers favor certain things no matter how good other things are and tend to work by habit.People get infatuated with things and don't like to venture off that path.
People may also not understand that when you get to a certain level of gear, the law of diminishing returns kicks in. It doesn't mean that the extra cost isn't worth it, it just is what it is.
Absolutely It is always up to the client/ producer.. They are the ones that pay us.. We have to deliver and be consistent or they will have the next guy chomping at their heals to come in.
I have had so much trial an ERROR over the decades. Many errors.. My many errors happened because we didn't have the internet the way young guys and girls do today.
We or I had to figure it out on my own.. And that costs money.. And sometimes LOTS of it..
I just try to tell people what i have experienced , so maybe they will be able to put the time into creating instead of shopping.. Don't get me wrong. Shopping is Fun. I am an Official Gear WHORE!!!
But i have found what i like , and it seams my bosses seem to like it to. And it gets me work.. Never Enough .but it gets me work. .
I really want to get a A-Design VEntura.. My friend Steve at the Bass hang uses one.. It is top dog stuff like NEVE, API, fatness with SSL clarity... Well one day.. And then , that just might screw up everything for me![]()
I really want to get a A-Design VEntura.. My friend Steve at the Bass hang uses one.. It is top dog stuff like NEVE, API, fatness with SSL clarity... Well one day.. And then , that just might screw up everything for me![]()
Im also kind of thinking that your Dingwall into the Monique sounds pretty nice.. Growly too?
One question OT.. String spacing on those Dingwall 5 string basses.. are they WIDE like an Alleva or Sadowsky or slighly more narrow like a Musicman Stingray 5?
I saw Lee's Sig bass and it seems a little more narrow..
And you expected it to go differently?![]()
Im also kind of thinking that your Dingwall into the Monique sounds pretty nice.. Growly too?
One question OT.. String spacing on those Dingwall 5 string basses.. are they WIDE like an Alleva or Sadowsky or slighly more narrow like a Musicman Stingray 5?
I saw Lee's Sig bass and it seems a little more narrow..
You didn't ask me, but I'd put the Dingwall spacing on the narrow end of the spectrum. Narrower than Sadowsky or Lakland but a bit wider than MM. 18mm on the 5ers if memory serves correctly.
I was kinda hoping the members of talks could have a discussion without acting like children however if you read the OP i was braced for this
For anyone who had helpful/relevant info to add to this forum thank you. For everyone who takes it personally when someone criticizes a piece of gear you paid too much for... lighten up
Its 18mm across the board on the models and lines...except the Super Series, which are 19mm. The bridge system which is designed by the Dingwall shop isn't really conducive to being flexible to string width, although I have an older Dingwall that has a stock Kahler bridge that also feels to be 18mm. Since the geometry on the basses is a bit complex, its sometimes hard to tell what the spacing is...
Dingwall Bass Specifications | Side by Side Comparison | Dingwall Guitars
The way your original post is worded wasn't going to have any other outcome. It's the internet after all. I have my suspicions that you knew this at the outset and the thread went exactly how you wanted it to go as evidenced by your language in other posts, like this one, for instance:
I like narrow spacing. I've been playing MM fivers for 15 years. That's one (of many) things that appeal to me about Dingwalls.
For anyone who had helpful/relevant info to add to this forum thank you. For everyone who takes it personally when someone criticizes a piece of gear you paid too much for... lighten up
Troll.
The way your original post is worded wasn't going to have any other outcome. It's the internet after all. I have my suspicions that you knew this at the outset and the thread went exactly how you wanted it to go as evidenced by your language in other posts, like this one, for instance:
The REDDI is actually unique as it is the only tube DI currently on the market so far ( that I know of anyway) that uses a real single ended output transformer. The primary side of the transformer is used as the AC load on the tube and has to pass DC current. This necessitates a larger and inherently more expensive transformer than in the typical circuit used in these boxes which is a resistor loaded tube, capacitor coupled out to a small transformer to balance and drop the output impedance (like the SVT-DI or the Demeter for example). Off the shelf transformers of this type run $200+ and typically don't have the extended low end response of the one in the REDDI.
Wow, way to ruin a nice post with a dicky final comment.For anyone who had helpful/relevant info to add to this forum thank you. For everyone who takes it personally when someone criticizes a piece of gear you paid too much for... lighten up