• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Rickenbacker..... i just don't understand the hype.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've owned a good few Rics over the years.

On a personal level, I don't like the feel of the modern 4003...or the tone. I've owned and played a good few to reach my conclusion! YMMV.

My '74 4001, to me, is the Ric. It feels and plays very differently to a new 4003. It's not perfect....big neck, heavy, big nasally mids....but it just feels alive.

Just my thoughts....I just feel the new basses lack a little magic. No idea why!
 
  • Like
Reactions: bassboysam
[ironic sarcasm alert]

I can't understand how people can like the color yellow! What on earth have they been smokin´? Or liking Justin Bieber! Or liking [insert whatever here]. While I agree with the OP I don't go out on a campaign about it. I still love others playing it, as Entwhistle, Geddy Lee, Chris Squire is/was my house gods. Still couldn't care less if others play it or hype it. I can buy others, fortunately.
 
You are very correct however Mr Wobble nails it. The Australia tax is a real thing. Some of it is due to shipping such a distance, a lot of it due to insurance as our society is more litigation happy than just about anywhere in the world now, however some of it can only be explained away by the fact that even companies outside Australia are happy to rip us off as badly as Australian companies. My example about Adobe software isn't an isolated issue. There is no shipping or packaging for download software however in many cases it is exorbitantly higher in price over here.
Smaller population / market size has an effect as well.
 
Why not just focus on the basses you actually like to play and not worry about the basses you don't care for?

Saves time and typing. ;)
I like the OP saying this.
I've never liked Ric's. Just one of those things. But a new player might wonder what's wrong with them as a player... these guitars are so well respected and highly rated. Nah. They're just not for some people.
 
I can say with certainty that if i knew nothing about Rics and was handed one of these after playing the Squier VM PJ (which actually sounded better than all but the Am Pro) i would have guessed it would cost less than the Squier when taking into account the fit, finish and sound.
Don't feel bad, inexperienced players often can't tell a good bass from a bad one! :D
 
Six pages and no good pics?

2ij14k6.jpg


That said, I totally feel what the OP is saying. The first time I played a Jazz bass, I thought to myself why would people want to play a bass with a neck like a broom stick? Since I am the arbiter of the worth and suitability of all basses and other musical instruments of the world, I just couldn't understand it. They should just stop making Jazz basses. Why is there all this hype? Clearly, if I don't like an instrument, no one should like it.
 
Ah, a Rickenbacker thread!:hyper:

A few years back, when I was really rakin' it in, I bought a beautiful Firemist 4003, followed by a Laredo, natural finish.
First thing I did was have them both set up by my tech, which made a big difference IMO.

I really enjoyed them both; mine were very well made instruments with lots of character.
I particularly got a kick out of playing some deep-pocket FUNK on the '03, a genre that is not generally associated
with Ric's. But I must say, the tone from that bass was sweeeet, and it laid right in the mix too.

So I'm a fan. When $$$ stopped flowing for a period, I sold both. One thing I must say is these basses are WANTED, I sold them immediately at asking price, the 4003 the same day listed!

As far as getting another, there's a few other basses on my GAS list now, & since I've had my Ric fix, maybe I'll pass.
But I personally have only good things to say about the brand & the company from my experience.

And to the OP- You're cool, lots of people don't "feel" Rickenbackers, as is the case with lots of brands.
 
I've got a 2010 Ric; its finish is really good and I was thinking the other day about how nice the pickguard is.
To me it has a quality feel about it.
I did a little bit of setup on it and it plays well.
If someone doesn't like Rics, then no problem.
 
I played a Ric for the first time yesterday and to say i was underwhelmed would be a massive understatement.

It was a brand new Jetglo 4003 which was on sale for $3549. To put this into perspective i also played a Fender Am Pro Jazz at $2629, an MIM Jazz at $1199 and a Squier VM PJ at $699.

The first thing i noticed was that it wasn't as uncomfortable as many have said other than the pickup cover getting in the way. I could quite easily physically play one without complaint.

Now for the negatives...... The second thing i noticed was that the single ply pick guard looked like it was made for a cheap Chinese toy. Really, really cheap looking. Then the finish, which when held up to the light, looked very thin and showed obvious ripples as though done by a beginner. It wasn't really bad as such but when it's one of the more expensive basses in the shop you should expect much better. Finally, the pickups output was very weak.

I can say with certainty that if i knew nothing about Rics and was handed one of these after playing the Squier VM PJ (which actually sounded better than all but the Am Pro) i would have guessed it would cost less than the Squier when taking into account the fit, finish and sound.

LET THE FLAMING BEGIN!!!
I'm sure the six year olds that built your Squier appreciate your brand loyalty.
 
Play what you like, like what you play, it's pretty simple, really.
Form and function are what really matter.

If you're real all about looks and "image" and holding things up in every angle of light to find percieved "flaws" you're missing the point.
 
a BIG part of the deal with Rickenbacker basses that gets swept under the rug sometimes is the fact that a Rick is 33.25" scale - and due to the number of frets and the neck placement, the "reach" is slightly easier for many players - especially those that might be used to full 34" scale. While I won't call the difference dramatic, size matters. You can check with your partner about that.

:D:D:D:D:D

You can see it here, of course, there is always a little photo distortion, but if you measure the exact distance from nut to 12th fret and pop the basses up to full size until they match, this is what you get:

Fender-Rick.png


When I played my first Rick, it was instantly so much easier to get around on than my Fender Jazz I was amazed. Of course, for me as a rule - 32" medium scale ended up being my bliss, but the Rick was a mighty fine stopover on my way to finding my perfection. Recorded all but one song on one heck of an album with it - an album that made a pretty iconic list in Rolling Stone Invalid Link Removed.

I am always amused that many folks don't know that the Rick is not full scale, but it isn't.
 
I don't particularly know what full scale is, nor if a Ric is full scale or not, nor any instrument I've played; I've never taken a tape measure to them to find out. Who says that precisely 34" is the definition of full scale?

If there was anything about their playability, it would be the neck width & profile for me.

And, of course, I like the sound.

And the look.

(I might check out that prog list, though!)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.