• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Rickenbacker

shwashwa said:
true, but i have other basses if i need other tones... i think i like the rick the way it is. besides, if the output of the bridge pickup is increased by the mod, cant the same affect be accomplished by turning down the neck pickup and increasing the over all volume at the amp or preamp?

The cap acts a a high pass filter, eliminating some of the low end response from the pup. It will sound fuller with the cap removed, not just louder.
 
Bingo! I forgot to mention the bass roll-off of the cap.

If you like the way it sounds, then leave it alone. If you're curious about it though, again, you can do it without removing the cap or really altering the bass. Probably 90% of the 4001's out there have had the cap removed, thats why Rickenbacker stopped putting them in when they introduced the 4003. The whole idea behind the cap was to produce a sudo-stereo effect when the bass was used with a Rick-O-Sound unit, treble to one amp, bass to another. All it really did was sent to signal of the bridge pu (with the cap rolling off the bass) to one amp and the neck pu to another one.

~Paul :)
 
i must add to this behemoth thread. :) over several days i managed to read most of it (whew)...

count me as one who loves his rickenbacker. i've got a white '74 4001 with the PU cap bypass modded so as to be toggle switchable. i love the huge variety of tones that the rick can create and i mostly play fingerstyle, but have been known to grab a pick for certain types of tunes that need that attack. sounds great DI or through an amp and has served me well for the 6 or 7 years i've had it.
 
AnTz0r said:
Didn't John Hall mention the cap was there because the 4001 was designed for flatwounds, and when roundwounds became popular people removed them because roundwound have more treble already?

No, it's for the Rick-O-Sound, to help create more sonic contrast between the pickups and help the sudo-stereo efffect. That's why the "S" models ("4001S" and such) don't have the cap, those models are mono, no need for the cap. I'm still not sure why the 4001C64 has the cap, the originals didn't (yes, it's mono!).

~Paul :)
 
anu76 said:
hi im use rickenbacker 4003 1975..can u teel me what strings u recommend for ricken bass??


If you're sure that your bass is a 1975, it isn't a 4003. I would have to be a 4001. The 4003 wasn't introduced until late 1979.

As for strings, what type do you prefer, roundwounds or flatwounds? I would strongly suggest that you don't put any heavier gauge than 45-105's on it. Personally, I only use 45-100 Blue Steel Roundwounds on my early 70's 4001.

TD
 
I own a 4003 and have played a 4003/5 and was not impressed with it. The bass felt like a standard Ric that someone just added another string to. The neck felt no wider than my standard Ric and the string spacing was very tight. The B string did not have the tightness that I was hoping for either. I agree, and believe they make a fine 4 string, but with the 5 I think they missed the boat. I will stick with my Gibson, Alembic, and Pedulla for a quality 5.
 
Christov said:
I own a 4003 and have played a 4003/5 and was not impressed with it. The bass felt like a standard Ric that someone just added another string to. The neck felt no wider than my standard Ric and the string spacing was very tight. The B string did not have the tightness that I was hoping for either. I agree, and believe they make a fine 4 string, but with the 5 I think they missed the boat. I will stick with my Gibson, Alembic, and Pedulla for a quality 5.

The neck on the 4003S/5 was 1/16" wider than the neck of a 4003 which resulted in extremely tight string spacing.

The reason for the poor tension of the B-string was because they used a 115 gauge string rather than the traditional 130 gauge.

BTW, RIC discontinued the 4003S/5 five years ago. They currently don't offer a 5-string bass.

TD
 
If only they would reintroduce 4004Cii/5 with proper pickups.....

DSC01966.gif

DSC01976.gif
 
Can anyone advise if there's any problem mounting Dunlop strap locks on a Rickenbacker 4003?

Um, it might be a little dificult. Rics don't use wood-screws for the strap-buttons like most other brands. Instead they use machine screws and threaded holes on the body. On older Ricks the strap buttons and the mute hieght adjustment thumb-screws were the same part. The Schaller buttons that come on new Ricks aren't regular stock units, they're made specialy for Rick with the threaded rod milled onto the back side of the button.

You could figure out what size screw they use (try posting on Rickenbacker's BBS to get this info) then go to the hardware store and find some the same size that fit in the Dunlops. Or you can have the holes plugged and new holes drilled.

Good luck!

~Paul :-)
 
I think if you order the straplocks directly from Ric, (Standard issue on the new ones) they will fit the existing holes. At least that's what I read on the Ric forum when someone asked this same question a few months back.
 
...... I remember when I first started playing bass (around 1980), the pro bassists all either had a Fender or a Rickenbacker (maybe the odd Gibson). Now you hardly ever see a Rickenbacker played. I teach bass at a high school 2 days a week, and I ask the young bassists there about Rickenbacker, and almost none of them have even heard of them. It's a shame. Maybe Ric needs to advertise more.......

Why oh why would they? Rickenbacker pretty much sells every guitar they make, every year. And out of production models fetch big prices if someone sells one in good shape.

You are correct though, late 70's and early 80's,these were the must have basses. But then you figure some of the most iconic bass players were in the height of their popularity then.

Geddy Lee, Chris Squire, Paul McCartney and Mike Rutherford, to name just a few, were very prominent in the publics eye at that time. They fairly dominated the music scene and were innovators in this time period.

Rickenbacker is still a premium bass and as has been said here, they have not muddied their rep by producing "entry level" instuments, If you want a Rick, you pay....though in all honesty, a good Rick is quite a value at today's prices.

Also, as you have said, one generally must take or leave the sound. And it can depend on the music style, but mostly it depends on the player. A wide variety of music has been driven by a Rick bass...

Now if I could stop kicking myself for not picking one up back in the mid 80's when it sat in the used section for a steal...:bawl: