• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Rock n Roll lost something after 1959

I meant people don’t always necessarily bond with music of their teens. This may have been true with pop rock of the first post-war decades, during a unique period of pop musical culture effervescence.

Since the 1980s I think people learning guitar tend to look to the past.

My teenage sons and their guitar/drum playing friends and peers in 2004 were going back to the 1970s to find worthwhile things to play.

Teenagers learning violin have for a long time been going back to 18th century compositions.

That’s all, just my opinion, I don’t want to get anyone upset :laugh:. Although that’s ok too :roflmao:.
I’m not upset :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: butterfingers1

Has-beens and fried-brains in 1970s pants doesn’t add much here. The Everly Brothers in their prime might.

It’s pretty obvious that most influential musicians in the 1960s and beyond

(Beatles, Beach Boys, Stones, Carole King, Phil Spector, Byrds, everyone at Woodstock, all their tributaries and offshoots)

were trying to recreate, rearrange, enrich if possible, the simple but searing chords, arrangements, melodies of 1950s blues folk soul and yes doo-wop.

This drive wore itself out eventually, it was inevitable. People will always play music. The music and entertainment business is thriving.

But the burst of creativity in the early post-war decades, fueled by the electric guitar, recording/playback technology, baby-boom bulge of youth, and widening economic prosperity, well this was a one-off come-and-gone phenomenon. I don’t think a 12-year-old today will be driven to pick up a guitar to play Taylor Swift or JayZ.
 
I think there was a lot of good POP music in the 60s and after, but as far as Rock, it's just been missing something.

What do you think?

i think elvis was missing something after signing with rca. okay, i'll give you 'heartbreak hotel' ... floyd cramer represent 8-) he flared again briefly in the early 70s (early j. scheff/tcb era). elvis's best rca tracks were trying to recreate the 'sun' sound, i.e. 'little sister' & 'hard-headed woman'.

myself, i greatly appreciate the 'rock' varieties ... prog rock, psych rock, pop rock, blues rock, soul rock, jazz rock ... that's where my head is at. when it goes metal or punk, i lose interest.
 
i think elvis was missing something after signing with rca. okay, i'll give you 'heartbreak hotel' ... floyd cramer represent :cool: he flared again briefly in the early 70s (early j. scheff/tcb era). elvis's best rca tracks were trying to recreate the 'sun' sound, i.e. 'little sister' & 'hard-headed woman'.

myself, i greatly appreciate the 'rock' varieties ... prog rock, psych rock, pop rock, blues rock, soul rock, jazz rock ... that's where my head is at. when it goes metal or punk, i lose interest.

It sounds like you prefer harder rocking music.