TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
...and part of me thinks about going to 4 string instead of 5's to make myself think about what I'm playing more and work toward slimmer necks as I get older and my hands start to hurt.
Quick pic of my PJ5. Still debating the sound issue. Most likely the Aguilar is just a dark pickup and I'm used to my Fender P5 and my Stingray. Also here's a couple sound clips so you can hear the difference between the Fender and the Roscoe in passive.
Other than that I love everything about it. Plays great, light weight, has the specs I wanted (PJ5 with active/passive and 18mm spacing)
View attachment 2905233


I really should send mine in after this weekends gigs. I have a couple weeks until the next gig and can "get by" with my 4 string for church and practicing. Just can't decide if I want to do the coil tap thing. When I'm sitting by myself I think yeah, it'd be cool to be able to switch to single coil or series or whatever. But when I'm playing live, in the heat of the moment between tunes, usually a pan to neck or bridge gives me what I need.![]()
I'm kind of leaning this way. Everyone says even a great bass benefits from a Plek but I don't know if I want to mess with a good thing. And, it's expensive to ship them. $130 to ship, $150 for the Plek, almost $300 to "fix" a bass that plays and sounds great? Maybe I'll put that towards a purchase of a fretless or something instead.For me..... sometimes too many options are just... too many options
Quick pic of my PJ5. Still debating the sound issue. Most likely the Aguilar is just a dark pickup and I'm used to my Fender P5 and my Stingray. Also here's a couple sound clips so you can hear the difference between the Fender and the Roscoe in passive.
Other than that I love everything about it. Plays great, light weight, has the specs I wanted (PJ5 with active/passive and 18mm spacing)
View attachment 2905233
A) I have a tracking number for my first roscoe. As there are so many wood option about which I have no understanding, I chose a pretty plain one. We’ll see if we’ll be friends, but it’s about time I tried one. They’re outside my normal “that’s not a Fender-thing” comfort level.
I really should send mine in after this weekends gigs. I have a couple weeks until the next gig and can "get by" with my 4 string for church and practicing. Just can't decide if I want to do the coil tap thing. When I'm sitting by myself I think yeah, it'd be cool to be able to switch to single coil or series or whatever. But when I'm playing live, in the heat of the moment between tunes, usually a pan to neck or bridge gives me what I need.![]()
A) I have a tracking number for my first roscoe. As there are so many wood option about which I have no understanding, I chose a pretty plain one. We’ll see if we’ll be friends, but it’s about time I tried one. They’re outside my normal “that’s not a Fender-thing” comfort level.
2: plekking. I’ve read that frets are hardened metal; and that plekking can remove a fair amount of the hardened exterior, leaving softer frets that can wear faster. And, that it’s an automated process that can produce good results, quickly and repeatedly. I think it can be beneficial for basses that haven’t been built by attentive craftspeople working at a high level. I also think that since I’ve owned Sadowsky, Valenti, Nordy, Alleva, etc, I haven’t had a bass that needed such; and I’d still rather have a good tech tweak a fret or two than have a machine tweak them all. YMMV
Keith also did setup and found some interesting things that were out of whack including the input jack and some neck issues which he caught. Worth it to me bc this was an older Roscoe that he could tweak with some of the newer techniques.
I fixed the original post. May go back and fix your quote as well....the power of a moderator....Well, you got me!?!![]()
That's interesting. I found the Plek didn't make a big difference on my fretted Roscoe which JOME77 has now (my headless was Plek'd as part of the build.)plekking. I’ve read that frets are hardened metal; and that plekking can remove a fair amount of the hardened exterior, leaving softer frets that can wear faster. And, that it’s an automated process that can produce good results, quickly and repeatedly. I think it can be beneficial for basses that haven’t been built by attentive craftspeople working at a high level. I also think that since I’ve owned Sadowsky, Valenti, Nordy, Alleva, etc, I haven’t had a bass that needed such; and I’d still rather have a good tech tweak a fret or two than have a machine tweak them all. YMMV
That's interesting. I found the Plek didn't make a big difference on my fretted Roscoe which JOME77 has now (my headless was Plek'd as part of the build.)
Where the Plek really had a noticeable impact was on my fretless. But it did remove some cool figuring in the diamondwood.
I had my Warmoth fretless neck pleked. There was some unevenness on the fingerboard and it was causing a sitar-like effect at the 12th fret (especially noticeable on the g string). The pleking fixed it!As proof I don’t know everything;
I didn’t know plekking was a thing for fretless. It does seem to make more sense on that to me
So, are you saying Roscoe out sources their work to Germany? Interesting! Somehow I was under the impression Roscoe did all of the work in Greensboro.