Sad news. I have several Roscoe Basses and love them all. Great quality at a good price and superb customer service!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Yeah, its not necessarily a good look.
I remember in the late 90s, early 2000s I was up in Richmond doing some work with GWAR. One of the nights I'm in my hotel room and that old national news show 20 / 20 is on. They are doing a hit piece on shock rock. GWAR keeps getting mentioned. So the next day When I see the old lead singer, Dave brockie, I ask him if he saw the piece on 20 / 20. He told me no, but said he had been getting calls all morning about it. I was pissed. Dave just laughed. He asked me how many times they mentioned the band name on national TV for free. I said about 8 times and they showed a few clips of the band. He said excellent. I was shocked. He looked at me and said, "All press is good press. there is no such thing as bad press." A week later Dave is smiling. I asked him whats up. He told me they had a huge bump in sales from the hit piece on 20 / 20 last week.
That moment kind of changed my outlook a little on "bad press". Im hoping in the case of Roscoe they come out of their restructuring fine. This post has gotten alot of people talking about Roscoe. It may even encourage some to buy to help them out when they need the help the most.
Some may look at this as a doom and gloom prediction, while others could look at this as a new start and a rebirth. I guess its all perspective.
It sounds like Roscoe made an investment [ based on a loan ] in new machinery and a larger space at just the wrong time . This is a case of bad luck not fraud and they appear to be trying to restructure properly given the circumstances . They didn't take the money and run as some have or stall on their delivery's as others have . To state that they are now a risky investment if you want a new guitar is not fair to them nor necessarily a certainty at all . We here should be wishing them well not casting aspersions . Just my two cents ... Kelly
And believe it or not, no one on TB can do much to change any of that, except go out and order a bunch of brand new Roscoes.
Are you some kind of spokesman for that company? You are taking this WAY too personal.
I'll go away. Goodbye...
It is totally fair to say it’s a riskier investment.
It has nothing to do with whether people are good or bad - plenty of bad people stay in business and plenty of good people go under. It has to do with numbers.
Depending on how a bankruptcy goes, the business is either fine after, or it’s the first of many.
It seems a lot of people here haven’t been on the losing side of a business going under as a customer or even as an employee. That’s good - but if you aren’t going to put your own money down, and you aren’t going to offer to help reimburse anyone who is putting their own money at risk, you’re doing people a disservice by claiming there is no risk.
Is it probable that people will put money down and get what they want? Sure. Why not. Is it certain? No.
Actually being a 'good' person is a relevant point here for me. The message being conveyed is that Kieth would not accept an order he could not fulfill as promised. Why? Because he is not out to take a small short term desperate grab to lose his reputation over. The company has a high level of integrity and for those of us who have dealt with him, that's relevant. Therefore the 'risk' of being burned is the same as it was prior to the filing. Chapter 11 is common. Some businesses know well in advance they are closing for good, well before filing, but file anyway to buy time. Many others use chapter 11 for what it is designed for, reorganize debt. Coming out of this leaner and stronger is a definite possibility.
The risk is never the same.
By the same token, if you were working with a one or two person business, there’s no guarantee that an errant bus or tornado couldn’t take out the entire business. That’s a real risk, and it happens.
By all means, if you want to support someone, buy from them. In fact, every time you buy a bass from someone else, you’re essentially saying you’d rather they be the ones that stay in business. If you want to keep small businesses afloat, patronize them - just understand that sometimes that isn’t enough.
That’s something that makes a difference. I’m not seeing a ton of, “I saw the news, and I just placed an order” in here, and you’d think that people would realize that if they actually want to see the business stick around, that’s what they should be doing.
??
Respectfully, that is a very limited or incomplete understanding of what were talking about here. I am well aware (and experienced) in how small business works. I am also well aware from first hand family knowledge that even driving, cooking, living life, getting out of bed is a risk. Bus, Tornado? That is not the 'risk' we are talking about here. And by saying anything other than a Roscoe purchase is supporting their demise is a deluded thought. 'The math' for running a successful business is affected in many ways, by many factors (hence the chapter 11) ...'sales' is only one contribution.
In what way is there a limited or incomplete understanding?
Here are the facts:
- If you are in bankruptcy, decisions were made that were not optimal, given the benefit of hindsight. Life happens, but realize that the “bad luck” that occurred in the past could easily strike again, and if you’re operating from a place of sufficient capital, you can weather bad luck. If you are operating from a place where you are lean on capital, you’re having to roll the dice and hope for the best.
- Bankruptcy does have a discouraging impact on the willingness of other parties to engage in business with you, meaning that the terms under which you conduct business could be less favorable than previously. This can either impact your top line (dealers and/or individual customers) or your bottom line (suppliers and sources of financing)
- If the marginal revenue associated with selling a new bass exceeds the marginal cost of producing a new bass, then each new bass ordered will be accretive to the bottom line, and help the business find new footing. If this equation doesn’t hold, then each additional unit will push a business further in the hole.
At the end of the day, if you haven’t placed your order today, all you’re doing is trying to encourage people to put up their own money. Unless you’re willing to contribute to reimburse people in the event of a business failure, you should stop trying to convince other people who may be on the fence. Let them make their own decisions, and if they are concerned about the bankruptcy filing, then stop trying to influence their risk tolerance.
Personally, I’d be fine paying for an “in stock” instrument from a company that filed for bankruptcy. Would I prepay an order for one? No. Especially given that even if I were to pay in phases as the work was completed, I would be considered an unsecured creditor.
I recently ordered a bass, and the person requested that I use PayPal in a manner that affords me no protections (the friend/family style transfer). I considered the cost of the bass, the likelihood it would be fulfilled, and I took an educated risk - fully appreciating there was a chance I just flushed money down the toilet. This is FAR different than just closing my eyes and saying, “person on the internet told me it’d be all right”.
"If the marginal revenue associated with selling a new bass exceeds the marginal cost of producing a new bass, then each new bass ordered will be accretive to the bottom line, and help the business find new footing. If this equation doesn’t hold, then each additional unit will push a business further in the hole."