The latter statement is an interesting way to prove stated C11 points, especially considering the PayPal user agreement for both buyer and seller. The transaction described violates PayPal's terms of service by both parties, stealing their rightful commission in a fraudulent way in avoiding a clear goods/service deal. That this is considered "educated risk" makes one wonder about the overall quality of educated thinking in a broader sense.In what way is there a limited or incomplete understanding? . . I recently ordered a bass, and the person requested that I use PayPal in a manner that affords me no protections (the friend/family style transfer). I considered the cost of the bass, the likelihood it would be fulfilled, and I took an educated risk - fully appreciating there was a chance I just flushed money down the toilet. This is FAR different than just closing my eyes and saying, “person on the internet told me it’d be all right”.
So, one was interested in transacting in this fraudulent manner because "a person on the internet (seller) said that it would be alright?" LOL. Sidebar: If the transaction includes a Talkbass seller, it's also a user agreement violation with clear penalties.
Last edited:
