RULES YOU'D LIKE TO SEE ON TB

[mike_v_s]

Well maybe they shouldn't be ignorant, now should they? I swear to God, if I hear one more kid talk about how bassists who play with picks suck or how the only good basses are four string ibanezs I'm gonna start busting heads.

Why you be hatin'? (that's not against the rules yet, is it?)

Mike

 

[geeza]

We are your new generation, like it or not, and making us feel bad about our playing or gear doesnt help.

So you're saying we're raising a generation of weenies?

 

[john turner]

Thank you John, for your open door policy and understanding. We all live, breathe, and worship bass playing, and to have to walk on eggshells can be trying at times. GOD BLESS!

lol i want to know what he said before the edit. (or maybe i don't ).

 

[J. Crawford]

Well maybe they shouldn't be ignorant, now should they? I swear to God, if I hear one more kid talk about how bassists who play with picks suck or how the only good basses are four string ibanezs I'm gonna start busting heads.

I agree. But ignorant is not mead or rude, its unknowing. In that post. I meant the threads of a TB member with 1 post and they simply ask if Squier is a decent company.

Why must people go out of their way to make said person look like a fool in front of all of TB, or make a rude comment, when its their first post on a forum known for having a good reputation.

So you're saying we're raising a generation of weenies?

Whoa, you caught my point exactly. :scowl:

 

[mike_v_s]

Why must people go out of their way to make said person look like a fool in front of all of TB...

So you'd prefer that kinda stuff be delivered via PM? It's a little farther out of my way, but OK.

Mike

 

[popinfresh]

lol i want to know what he said before the edit. (or maybe i don't ).

You probably don't

 

[username n/a]

I agree. But ignorant is not mead or rude, its unknowing. In that post. I meant the threads of a TB member with 1 post and they simply ask if Squier is a decent company.

Why must people go out of their way to make said person look like a fool in front of all of TB, or make a rude comment, when its their first post on a forum known for having a good reputation.

Maybe they should have done a search?

 

[Joe Gress]

Maybe they should have done a search?

+1

 

[JimmyM]

There are enough rules on TB. But I find all the "do a search" replies offensive and annoying. So what if someone starts a new thread? I thought this was a forum where people could post questions. So my only new rule would be "Stop answering questions with 'do a search.'"

 

[bassteban]

Yeah, *do a search* is rather tired. When I find myself in a spot where that phrase might go, I do a search and post a link to the results. Takes about as long as typing DOS.

 

[Thunderscreech]

have you ever gone to a board even a fraction of this size that had no rules?

.

4chan /b/

I mean, I'm just saying...it exists.

 

[coyoteboy]

I would like a rule where the posting font of a member is two times the number of years the poster has been a member. Joined in 2006:3 year member: Posts appear in a 6 point font.

So, the grognards rule, eh? I don't see a size 18 font...


- coyoteboy, 9 years and counting... hey I joined the same month as JT! (what happened to me?)

 

[MakiSupaStar]

Thor, it's s2N+1​, that's the correct formula for how exponential the epic win is. You don't need mathematic row to define the value of N then.

There is absolutely no reason why this should not be my new sig.

 

[René_Julien]

There is absolutely no reason why this should not be my new sig.

I'm honored.


C'thulhu discussing mathematics with Thor. What does that mean?


Only downside in my formula is: you can't determine fail anymore.

N=0, is regular win.
N=1, is epic win.
N=2, double epic win
N=3, triple epical win
N=4, is quadriple epical win with tears from the eyes


ah,

N=0,5 is fail
N=1,5 is dividing by zero fail
N=2,5 is über fail
....
and so on