• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

S.U.B. Club

This is for US made Ernie Ball Music Man Sub (or S.U.B., on the oldest made ones) basses from the early to mid 2000s.

They were made in california. label on back of the headstock says this. Sub was the acronym for Sport Utility Bass and was the first ever lower priced line of musicman basses (and guitars after a little while).

They stopped making them in 2006 because cost of manufacture rose to the point that they lost money on each bass (according to Sterling Ball himself).

These ones (that this thread is about) in retrospect turned out to be pro quality instruments that were very similar to classic 1980s Stingrays (classics) with 2 band eq, alnico pickups, non switching parallel wired pickup, and slab body without contours. This is why these basses are sought after by many of us, yet still go fairly cheap on the used market due to low original sale prices and lack of understanding of their value.

Differences are in wood (poplar), finish (to cover the ugly but great sounding poplar to because it's cheaper to finish a maple neck in black than in hand rubbed oil), and head stock color (all US made vintage Subs have black headstocks, no matter what the color of the bass).

That is the easiest way to tell if it's a US made Sub - black on the headstock and back of the neck probably means it's one of the US serious quality ones.

The CURRENT Sub line however is their entry level offshore built line of basses. They are certainly good basses for the cheap money, but they don't use US made pickups, preamps, bridges, tuners, wood, manufacturing, etc etc. They are not anywhere near in the same league as the instruments discussed in this thread.

So the meaning of the title Sub bass changed after 2006.

until then it was a super cool little understood american made line of instruments that kicked ass and were effectively the first version of the stingray classic, albeit without the same cosmetics or subtleties of finish.

After 2006 (not sure when, late 2000s? 2010s?) the Sub line came back as an entry level import line of instruments.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eff-clef
Don't get me wrong. I own almost as much Musicman as I do Moog (and I have a lot of moog!)
Huge fan.
Just wish they'd picked a totally different name than Sterling for all the budget axes. Then to make it worse they make a Sterling SUB (not to be confused with the rare SUB Sterling). Though I can't blame them since the SUB brand had been moribund.

But now I have two basses whose model names I have to qualify if I sell or trade them.
 
My fretted sub 5 is growing on me... Still though I'm surprised how much I prefer the tone and general ease of sounding good on the fretless sub 5 compared to this fretted one.

My btb makes me sound better... So does my cort GB... But I practiced on the fretted sub for a while this morning and sound much better than I did on it. Mis fretting buzz and left hand noise is a problem on it... But then I am used to more mids and less treble in my tone so could explain it.


I think this bass will be really good for me... I haven't played full time for 15 years so my chops are no doubt messy now.
 
Though I can't blame them since the SUB brand had been moribund.

But now I have two basses whose model names I have to qualify if I sell or trade them.

I totally blame them.... LoL.... Can't blame ourselves for not buying enough ebmm subs therefore forcing the ball brothers to use the name again in the future for a different line of instruments. It's a marketing error, not a purchasing error.

And the use of Sterling's name is bizarre.... High end and low end instruments are associated with his name, but without any clear memorable differentiation in naming
 
Just picked up some sunbeams to try on the fretted 5. Still loving my fretless with hi beams but fretted with rotos isn't sounding right.

Pretty hopeful that strings are the problem.

Oh and I found that the second smallest of my mini screw drivers slot style head fits great in the bridge saddles of this baby so I've been solving bridge setup and buzzing like crazy.

One or two bizarrely high-challenged frets up high... Will have to get those redone soon. For now action is a little higher than I'd like to make up for that.

Can't wait for wife to go to bed lol
 
Just picked up some sunbeams to try on the fretted 5. Still loving my fretless with hi beams but fretted with rotos isn't sounding right.

Pretty hopeful that strings are the problem.

Oh and I found that the second smallest of my mini screw drivers slot style head fits great in the bridge saddles of this baby so I've been solving bridge setup and buzzing like crazy.

One or two bizarrely high-challenged frets up high... Will have to get those redone soon. For now action is a little higher than I'd like to make up for that.

Can't wait for wife to go to bed lol

D'Adarrio EXL 170-5's are currently working quite well on my SUB5 - best of all, they don't cost alot, and last pretty long, too... Before that, I had Regular Slinkeys - but the 170-5s aren't as harsh sounding, while still retaining enough brightness and low end for my tastes...



- georgestrings
 
I have one of the original SUB 5 string active basses from about 2005 that I used as a test mule for pickup and preamp development work I was doing a few years ago. The body has been routed to heck, so it's not useable but the neck and hardware are all in very good condition. If some one out there has a fretless SUB5 and wants a nice fretted neck to go with it I'd consider parting it out. Same goes for the bridge, neck plate, knobs, strap pins, and control plate (minus the preamp).
PM me if interested.
 
I have one of the original SUB 5 string active basses from about 2005 that I used as a test mule for pickup and preamp development work I was doing a few years ago. The body has been routed to heck, so it's not useable but the neck and hardware are all in very good condition. If some one out there has a fretless SUB5 and wants a nice fretted neck to go with it I'd consider parting it out. Same goes for the bridge, neck plate, knobs, strap pins, and control plate (minus the preamp).
PM me if interested.

Or just build a really fugly passive stingray classic!
 
OK. I put new sunbeams on my fretted sub 5.

Sniff... Why didn't you guys tell me to do this sooner? Sniff.. It's the most amazing tone of any bass I've ever owned... Sniff...

Any concerns I had with the b string or inferiority to my fretless sub 5 are forgotten now!

I can hardly believe my ears,....

This is the same God like tone I got as a hired session bassist for a post grunge metal band in a recording studio where I was playing an entirely rented dream metal bass rig, hh stingray into svt miked. My home sounded just like that tonight with my sub, new sunbeams, and my ampeg pf350 into tray nor 112 with deltalite neo II driver.

I'm in LOVE with this bass now!

Oh and for the record... B string is 125. Sounds incredible and balance is perfect, tone is super intense all over b string until maybe over the 12th fret.

This IS a stingray for all intents and purposes, just with alternate finish and wood choices.
 
I have a Stingray, and although the SUB Ray may come real close after a couple hundred dollars of work it will never be a stingray for all intents and purposes. Although I wish it were so, but then everyone would just get a hold of a SUB Ray 4/5 and preform the upgrades. Even with the upgrades the craftsmanship would still not be the same as a Stingray.
 

Attachments

  • 1871.jpg
    1871.jpg
    146.1 KB · Views: 96
I have a Stingray, and although the SUB Ray may come real close after a couple hundred dollars of work it will never be a stingray for all intents and purposes. Although I wish it were so, but then everyone would just get a hold of a SUB Ray 4/5 and preform the upgrades. Even with the upgrades the craftsmanship would still not be the same as a Stingray.

You like to show off that picture of your Sterling By MusicMan SUB, eh?

:-)

I have to say it looks very good.
 
I have a Stingray, and although the SUB Ray may come real close after a couple hundred dollars of work it will never be a stingray for all intents and purposes. Although I wish it were so, but then everyone would just get a hold of a SUB Ray 4/5 and preform the upgrades. Even with the upgrades the craftsmanship would still not be the same as a Stingray.

What upgrades? I've played both stingrays (several over past month) and my two ebmm subs. They're effectively two versions of the same instrument off the same assembly line using the same parts.

There is nothing to upgrade. My pickup is the same as a stingray alnico version pickup. Etc etc

Your import sub is cool for sure, but didn't come stock with the same quality of parts as an ebmm sub has. Still a great bass, but really not the same thing as the us models.

I've played ray 34 and 35 basses. I almost bought one before lucking out on my fretted 5 ebmm sub find.
 
What upgrades? I've played both stingrays (several over past month) and my two ebmm subs. They're effectively two versions of the same instrument off the same assembly line using the same parts.

There is nothing to upgrade. My pickup is the same as a stingray alnico version pickup. Etc etc

Your import sub is cool for sure, but didn't come stock with the same quality of parts as an ebmm sub has. Still a great bass, but really not the same thing as the us models.

I've played ray 34 and 35 basses. I almost bought one before lucking out on my fretted 5 ebmm sub find.

+1 on all of the above - I owned an SR 5 HH and a SUB5 at the same time, and can state with confidence that the SUB5 is the same exact thing as a Stingray 5 Classic, minus the bridge mutes, and overall pretty looks...


- georgestrings