• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

S.U.B. Club

Proof that I played my SUB on my last gig.
 

Attachments

  • SUB Bass.jpg
    SUB Bass.jpg
    58.3 KB · Views: 93
You looking at that black passive? I heard the actives are better but I could be wrong

Yep, that's the one! [DEL]There's also a red (wine vomit purple?) one for sale, but it has a few dings and the black on the back of the neck is completely stripped. I believe it's active, but I'd rather get the passive one which is in better shape...[/DEL]

...unless, of course, the passive S.U.B.s are in fact worse than their active counterparts. Anyone else want to chime in?

Edit: The red one is passive as well. :hmm: The original (black) listing I was looking at didn't say if it was active or passive but 1) I trust your judgement and 2) it doesn't have a battery cover...something I overlooked before. :ninja: Usually a pretty good indicator of something being passive...
 
FWIW, I actually like the teal...:ninja:

And I'm posting here because I'm seriously looking at two used S.U.B.s (one on TB and one on eBay) because I want to get the Stingray sound for not a lot of cash. I would also prefer to get one of these USA made S.U.B.s over the new "Sterling by Music Man" models.

So, I came here to ask a specific question about the neck before I buy. When it comes to MM basses I prefer the Sterling nut width/profile over the Stingray, because I have smaller hands. My two other basses (a Fender Kingman and Ibanez SR600) have narrower profiles, and I'm very comfortable on them. So, I was wondering if the S.U.B. was Stingray-esque, or a little thinner. I know they sell "S.U.B. Sterlings" but I hear they're pretty hard to find (I only ever see "S.U.B. Stingrays" for sale).

Long question short: is the S.U.B. reasonably comfortable to play (I know it's really all up to personal preference, but I'm asking for your opinions), or would I be better off saving for a Classic Sterling/SLO Special/etc.?

Thanks for your help! :bassist: :D

Maybe I can help with this - I currently have a SUB5, a Sterling 5 HS, and before that had a Stingray 5 HH... I am definitely sensitive to 5 string neck widths/depths - IME/IMO, the SUB5 neck is slightly smaller than the SR 5 neck, the same width as the Sterling 5 neck, but just a tiny bit thicker from front to back than the Sterling 5 neck... The differences are subtle, but I can feel them, nonetheless - the SUB5 sounds EXACTLY like the SR 5 Classic, and the necks are exremely close to one another - the main differences are bridge mutes/string thu, and neck and body finishes...

Hope this helps, and feel free to ask me any specifics...


- georgestrings
 
Yep, that's the one! [DEL]There's also a red (wine vomit purple?) one for sale, but it has a few dings and the black on the back of the neck is completely stripped. I believe it's active, but I'd rather get the passive one which is in better shape...[/DEL]

...unless, of course, the passive S.U.B.s are in fact worse than their active counterparts. Anyone else want to chime in?

Edit: The red one is passive as well. :hmm: The original (black) listing I was looking at didn't say if it was active or passive but 1) I trust your judgement and 2) it doesn't have a battery cover...something I overlooked before. :ninja: Usually a pretty good indicator of something being passive...

IMO, the 2 band preamp of the SUBs is what makes them a "Stingray" - I wouldn't buy one without it...


- georgestrings
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rob Curry
Yep, that's the one! [DEL]There's also a red (wine vomit purple?) one for sale, but it has a few dings and the black on the back of the neck is completely stripped. I believe it's active, but I'd rather get the passive one which is in better shape...[/DEL]

...unless, of course, the passive S.U.B.s are in fact worse than their active counterparts. Anyone else want to chime in?

Edit: The red one is passive as well. :hmm: The original (black) listing I was looking at didn't say if it was active or passive but 1) I trust your judgement and 2) it doesn't have a battery cover...something I overlooked before. :ninja: Usually a pretty good indicator of something being passive...

there another black sub 4 active there but its a bit used...
 
I wonder if u can buy a pre amp and put a battery in the control plate cavity..funny though selling the passive basses as much as the actives..imo the actives are the most sought..

I'm not sure that would all fit in there - not without cutting in a battery compartment, that is - and *I* would just hold out for an active one, rather than go thru all that, and still risk a substandard outcome... I see active SUB5s come up on GC's used gear pages from time to time... There's one on there right now - not sure if it's active or not...


- georgestrings
 
FWIW, I actually like the teal...:ninja:

And I'm posting here because I'm seriously looking at two used S.U.B.s (one on TB and one on eBay) because I want to get the Stingray sound for not a lot of cash. I would also prefer to get one of these USA made S.U.B.s over the new "Sterling by Music Man" models.

So, I came here to ask a specific question about the neck before I buy. When it comes to MM basses I prefer the Sterling nut width/profile over the Stingray, because I have smaller hands. My two other basses (a Fender Kingman and Ibanez SR600) have narrower profiles, and I'm very comfortable on them. So, I was wondering if the S.U.B. was Stingray-esque, or a little thinner. I know they sell "S.U.B. Sterlings" but I hear they're pretty hard to find (I only ever see "S.U.B. Stingrays" for sale).

Long question short: is the S.U.B. reasonably comfortable to play (I know it's really all up to personal preference, but I'm asking for your opinions), or would I be better off saving for a Classic Sterling/SLO Special/etc.?

Thanks for your help! :bassist: :D

I've got smaller hands as well. I definitely feel more at home on a Sterling sized neck. I would say the "regular" SUBs are very much like the standard stingray width neck.
It doesn't really bother me too much because the projects I use my SUB for are all the type where I specifically do not want to overplay. I also wear that bass pretty low so I can get hands at a good angle (and for the METULLL).

Keep an eye out for a used "full blood" Sterling. I picked up mine for $600 because it had a scratchy pot and I am a hard bargaining former outside sales guy.