• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Scammed?

This is not a nice situation to find yourself in, and I really don't think that there is a "best way" to handle this.

In personal similar experiences (not with basses), my reaction has been to be really p****d but to move on with life. The important thing being to learn from the experience:

"When purchasing over the internet, the first step upon receiving said item is to thoroughly inspect for damages or other issues."

If you were inspecting something for purchase, you would examine it as thoroughly as possible in the situation that the purchase was taking place. Receiving something you bought unseen gives the chance to do the same inspection as above, but without the seller breathing down your neck. But this must be done immediately.

If you don't check all the points, but you are happy with what you got, do not investigate further at a later date unless you a prepared to be let down.

TL,DR: It's a b***h, but all you can do is move on.

(This doesn't mean you shouldn't warn others).
 
But the sellers photo means squat so why go through the exercise of having the seller take it apart? You have to do it again anyways. I'd worry about damaging the product with all that screwing around, and if was the seller I wouldn't jeopardize my own product for a potential sale.
Unless you take the neck off with a sledge hammer, it shouldn't hurt the bass. ;)
 
First off there is always two sides of a story. The one thing I would like to know is the name of the Luthier that took "said pics"... Any professional would know the significance of the pics in a sale of a "certain era" bass. The fact that the pics the buyer got look like they were downloaded from the net is bothersome. I personally have yet to ever pull a neck off a bass in my 6 or so years of playing. If
Talbass Classsifieds" are so up and up, shouldn't the pics posted by seller been trusted?

And I once bought a bass from the classifieds that had a maxed out truss rod, and a improperly placed aftermarket bridge. It took me a year to figure out the intonation was off. (I was a newb) The seller had a lot of feed back and seemed nice. So I assume he never really played it or realized the problems. In this case with the pics that were posted in the sale, someone seemingly was being dishonest somewhere...
 
First off there is always two sides of a story. The one thing I would like to know is the name of the Luthier that took "said pics"... Any professional would know the significance of the pics in a sale of a "certain era" bass. The fact that the pics the buyer got look like they were downloaded from the net is bothersome. I personally have yet to ever pull a neck off a bass in my 6 or so years of playing. If
Talbass Classsifieds" are so up and up, shouldn't the pics posted by seller been trusted?

And I once bought a bass from the classifieds that had a maxed out truss rod, and a improperly placed aftermarket bridge. It took me a year to figure out the intonation was off. (I was a newb) The seller had a lot of feed back and seemed nice. So I assume he never really played it or realized the problems. In this case with the pics that were posted in the sale, someone seemingly was being dishonest somewhere...
There are often three. The seller's, the buyer's and the truth. Two years is a long time.
 
Art, first things first... Hope your grandpa is doing well... at the very least, has a hot nurse...

Second... I would venture to say 90% of the members who've viewed this thread are savvy enough to know who's currently in the 'Federal Witness Protection' program, so maybe the secondary safe house would be a better bet...

Third... I haven't seen an actual pic displaying the serial number, and both the maid and gardener are unaccounted for...

Given the elapsed time and circumstances, do your best to find out exactly what it is that you have, price to sell, and be honest and upfront with questions asked of potential suitors...

Good luck to both you, and your military service, and best to grandpa...
 
This just got interesting... there is a 3rd picture of the neck heal in the seller's photo bucket account....

View attachment 1094914

Hmmmm.... I found the above photo in a seller's photobucket too, but didn't see the photos the OP posted... nor any evidence the OP bought from this seller... are you sure this is the right seller?
Be careful you guys... this photo is from a sale thread that I do not think is related to the OP's claim. I found feedback for that sale referencing a different buyer. Also...if those photos were in the sellers photobucket account that is clearly linked in his for-sale thread that is suspected by Portlandbass77, why would the OP have had to ask for a pic...it doesn't make sense. The seller would not have gone into his photo bucket account after the sale and add the picture after the sale was complete would he?

It is important to note that until recently, sale threads could be deleted by the seller, so the OP's ad may not exist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spidey2112
I don't want to mention who it is, since I want to make sure before I do anything about this. yet.

It's a long story, but let me briefly explain.

I have purchased a "Fullerton Era" jazz bass off of this forum about two years ago from this guy for my granddad. The bass has been sitting in the case most of the time until now -since my grandpa is so young, he only plays around so much. but due to his medical bills, and since I will be joining the military, we decided to sell it. that's when we figured out the bass is not from the Fullerton era.

Prior to buying, I asked him to send me pictures of bass and the stamps inside.
I was able to get all the pictures. but little that I knew, the stamp pictures were taken from below website -I just have discovered this when I searched for it.
1982 83 Fender Jazz bass Reissue



I wanted to get it setup before I sell the bass, then discovered the issue.
below are the actual pictures of my bass, no stamps at all.
View attachment 1094777 View attachment 1094778

I actually don't even know what type of bass this one is, I had it on the classified section,
but took it down since this is not a Fullerton.

I thought maybe the seller was not aware of what type of bass he had, but after looking at the stamp pictures he downloaded from the website, it is clear that he wanted to send me the wrong bass.
View attachment 1094796

What am I supposed to do?
My granddad is at the hospital, so do not want to ask him about this at the moment.

Please let me know..
Thank you in advance.

it sucks!! But how do you not inspect ASAP after receiving it! (?) Youre probably better of just accepting your lost learn your lesson and focus on what matters more ,
" your grand father ! "
a bad experience is a good experience if you learn from it!
 
I don't want to mention who it is, since I want to make sure before I do anything about this. yet.

It's a long story, but let me briefly explain.

I have purchased a "Fullerton Era" jazz bass off of this forum about two years ago from this guy for my granddad. The bass has been sitting in the case most of the time until now -since my grandpa is so young, he only plays around so much. but due to his medical bills, and since I will be joining the military, we decided to sell it. that's when we figured out the bass is not from the Fullerton era.

Prior to buying, I asked him to send me pictures of bass and the stamps inside.
I was able to get all the pictures. but little that I knew, the stamp pictures were taken from below website -I just have discovered this when I searched for it.
1982 83 Fender Jazz bass Reissue



I wanted to get it setup before I sell the bass, then discovered the issue.
below are the actual pictures of my bass, no stamps at all.
View attachment 1094777 View attachment 1094778

I actually don't even know what type of bass this one is, I had it on the classified section,
but took it down since this is not a Fullerton.

I thought maybe the seller was not aware of what type of bass he had, but after looking at the stamp pictures he downloaded from the website, it is clear that he wanted to send me the wrong bass.
View attachment 1094796

What am I supposed to do?
My granddad is at the hospital, so do not want to ask him about this at the moment.

Please let me know..
Thank you in advance.

ok, so if it might not be a 'Fullerton era' re-issue, what is it? Post for us some pics of the entire bass for us, including neck plate which should start with a 'V'. This may shed some light on to the situation.
 
One of the reasons I stay away from spending a bunch of money on vintage fenders. There's just so many clones out there and having to take the neck off to even look or to adjust the truss rod is rediculous. All basses should be more like Warwick. My Warwick has the year it was made on the back of the headstock and the number can be varified with a quick email
 
One of the reasons I stay away from spending a bunch of money on vintage fenders. There's just so many clones out there and having to take the neck off to even look or to adjust the truss rod is rediculous. All basses should be more like Warwick. My Warwick has the year it was made on the back of the headstock and the number can be varified with a quick email

Don't get too cocky. Anything, from a Squier to a Fodera to a Stradivarius, can, and is, ripped off.
 
1. No where are as much as Fenders sold. You going to make more money selling phony Fenders or Wishbasses?
2. Yes, they are easier to copy.
The sad part is when people spend additional money for an instrument made a specific year and can't even tell that it's not what it is. I'm not a cork sniffer, I bought my Warwick used for 1/4th of the new cost. I'd play a copy or a ripoff if it sounds good. But if I spent two, three, or four times as much on a vintage bass and couldn't instantly hear a difference I'd be pissed.
 
The sad part is when people spend additional money for an instrument made a specific year and can't even tell that it's not what it is. I'm not a cork sniffer, I bought my Warwick used for 1/4th of the new cost. I'd play a copy or a ripoff if it sounds good. But if I spent two, three, or four times as much on a vintage bass and couldn't instantly hear a difference I'd be pissed.

I'll play a legal copy any day - I don't care what it says on my headstock. My three basses say:

- Fender
- Lull (bought about 14 years ago, before he was that big a name)
- Bulldog Bass Company

No one has ever talked up or down any other those basses, other than by how they sound, or they play.