TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Bear with me on this... After playing for close to a year in a going-nowhere-fast cover band (still in the basement with aspirations of gigging), I finally may have landed a spot in a more established (actually gigging) band. I'm still jamming from time to time with band #1, who can't seem to settle on a line-up and set list. I continue to play with that band a couple times a month mostly for the live practice time. The problem I'm having is trying to learn set lists for two classic rock cover projects.
So my question is... is it cool to introduce songs from the new project into my old band? I know, songs are songs, but if things ever come together with the old band, we could conceivably be playing in the same area/venues as my new band. And since people are sensitive about being unique and playing more "obscure" covers, I don't necessarily want to poach the new band's material. Does that make any sense?
Chances are the (stubborn singer in the) old band won't play any of my suggestions anyway, but I figured I'd pose the question just for discussion.
Bullitt5135 said:Bear with me on this... After playing for close to a year in a going-nowhere-fast cover band (still in the basement with aspirations of gigging), I finally may have landed a spot in a more established (actually gigging) band. I'm still jamming from time to time with band #1, who can't seem to settle on a line-up and set list. I continue to play with that band a couple times a month mostly for the live practice time. The problem I'm having is trying to learn set lists for two classic rock cover projects.
So my question is... is it cool to introduce songs from the new project into my old band? I know, songs are songs, but if things ever come together with the old band, we could conceivably be playing in the same area/venues as my new band. And since people are sensitive about being unique and playing more "obscure" covers, I don't necessarily want to poach the new band's material. Does that make any sense?
Chances are the (stubborn singer in the) old band won't play any of my suggestions anyway, but I figured I'd pose the question just for discussion.
And what ARE the obscure cover tunes that go over well?? {Evil Grin}
![]()
And what ARE the obscure cover tunes that go over well?? {Evil Grin}
![]()
OP here... surprised to see this thread resurface. Shortly after my initial post, I walked away from band #1. It was a dead end and I knew it. After a month with the new band, the drummer quit -- which opened the door to bring my drummer friend on board. Five months later, we've built a repertoire of around 70 not-so-obscure songs and have played a couple gigs -- with several more coming up. We're having fun, and I have improved my playing a lot. When I wrote the original post, I really had no band experience. I didn't have a point of reference as to whether bands considered their set lists and song choices as "proprietary" material. With a little time and experience, I realize it was a dumb question considering we're just another bar band.
It'd piss me off, yeah.
If a guy joined my band and took songs he'd never thought of playing, that I had more or less unearthed (taking "obscure" literally) - and then started gigging those songs around with his other band - yeah, I'd be pissed.
I would feel like he was using my band to further his other project, as opposed to contributing to both bands.
Just my opinion, maybe I'm particularly cranky today.

I also believe that cover bands should have at least a few non-standard cover band tunes to set them apart.
I started putting it at the beginning of gigs or the end of sets so it's floor-clearing