• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Should I refin my '68 jazz?

should I refinish ?

  • Leave it alone idiot!

    Votes: 157 58.4%
  • Restore sunburst

    Votes: 22 8.2%
  • Restore sunburst and relic

    Votes: 20 7.4%
  • Choose a colour you like that is a fender colour

    Votes: 70 26.0%

  • Total voters
    269
Hi all, hoping I could get some opinions on here, I have a 1968 jazz bass all original parts and wiring, very playable condition, it has been refinished at some point in the 70's in nitro and was a pretty good job, apparently done by George Lowden a fairly well know guitar maker in Ireland, this stacks up as it's a local guitar.

The original colour was sunburst and it has the original tort pickguard. The finish has aged very nicely and has that light relic look with checking and great mojo.

However, I'm not sold on the colour but had to buy the bass because it's clearly awesome!!! The colour is not an original fender colour so should I

3. Pick a fender colour available in 1968 it's refinished anyway so value won't be affected much by another refinish
Since it is as you say already been refinished You cannot do any further harm by refinishing it. BTW: I hate the old sunburst finish. Newer sunburst with some red feathered in are better but I still prefer something else.
 
I voted for refinish sunburst & relic. My plan is that this will drop the value to where I can afford it :D

Edit: As long as you have pictures of the bass in George Lowden green, it will make a good story. It will then have a history of three finishes. Very nice bass, by the way.
 
Last edited:
If the wear spots had shown remnants of the supposedly original sunburst, I would be inclined to re-finish it in sunburst but not relic it. However, it looks like any remnants of the sunburst were completely removed before the last refinishing and the wear is not real bad on it, so I'd leave it as is and just rock it!
 
Thanks for all your replies, I think there is a general consensus that relic'd is a bad way to go if it was to be refinished... it won't harm the value to repaint it... however it will lose some cool factor by losing the vintage paint?
 
  • Like
Reactions: jjmuckluckjr
Hi all, hoping I could get some opinions on here, I have a 1968 jazz bass all original parts and wiring, very playable condition, it has been refinished at some point in the 70's in nitro and was a pretty good job, apparently done by George Lowden a fairly well know guitar maker in Ireland, this stacks up as it's a local guitar.

For f's sake. The finish has already paid off it's mortgage, while the body's retirement age. :woot:
That may be the first green bass I'd be proud to play. I do enjoy the sports car angle though.
 
Thanks for all your replies, I think there is a general consensus that relic'd is a bad way to go if it was to be refinished... it won't harm the value to repaint it... however it will lose some cool factor by losing the vintage paint?

It's only as cool as you think it is. You don't like the color or you wouldn't have asked in the first place. It'll never be original again, so paint it what ever color you like. Relic or not, as you see fit.