If we all just ignore him, he might go away.
It worked with nutso42.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
If we all just ignore him, he might go away.
Let's face it: Bawana is that annoying pseudo-intellectual second semester freshman in college who likes to argue in class and thinks he outwit the prof with some half-baked argument.
I never even went to college, I went to trade school but I love to argue. That doesn't mean I'm a complete nitwit like certain other people. I actually know ****...![]()
The primary focus of higher education is to provide you with intimidating vocabulary and names to drop, hoping your intellectual opponent will concede ignorance.
The primary focus of higher education is to provide you with intimidating vocabulary and names to drop, hoping your intellectual opponent will concede ignorance.
Isn't that also the point of most mainstream hip-hop too?![]()
It's so hard for a victim to prove that the rape occurred, how the hell could you ever prove it did not occur? Geez...wot a stupid idea :scowl:
I believe the thinking is you just can't believe women?
Yeah, they're all liars. Evil, evil feminist liars.
Women, huh? Can't rape 'em, can't rape without 'em.
And don't ignore the fact that men getting screwed in divorce settlements is a product of feminism. No MRA "intellectual" has been able to provide evidence linking those two things, but I trust them because they learned what the word hegemony means from some True Forced Loneliness blog. I say we just join the MGTOW movement and Go Galt on all of these women's asses. That will learn 'em!
Also note no man has ever been recorded to have lied; as the woman in the waitress story did, which was used as proof that any and every woman is de facto a liar.
It's so hard for a victim to prove that the rape occurred, how the hell could you ever prove it did not occur? Geez...wot a stupid idea :scowl:
I hope this helps you understand the problem.
That's a good question. Let's take the Duke "rape" case.
First there's the DNA evidence. Lot's of it from may different subjects.
None of it matched anyone at the Duke fart.
Next there's the time stamps surveillance cameras that had the alleged victim an the alleged perps many miles apart.
Then there's the dozens of witnesses.
None of this matter when lies started spilling form this serial false rape accusers mouth.
Rather than upset the local woman's group the prosecution hide exculpatory evidence. After all girl voters do not believe that girls lie.
The families of these brave boys had to come with 10 million dollars to fight city hall.
Just one example.
The liar walked free to continue her reign of terror until she finally murdered an innocent man.
Thanks so much for the chance to answer your question.
I hope this helps you understand the problem.
So, one isolated case is demonstrably true across all?
Talk about confirmation bias.