• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Should this bother me?

That is a pretty good gap.Parts can change size and shape over the years,But something there looks super wonky with the neck or pocket . Does the neck move if you move it? Are the mounting screws tight? If yoo can, maybe post pics of the whole bass and the neck pocket from all angles?

I had a 1980s MIJ Fender P. Same size of gap. Had a JV Squier, a year earlier, no gap. Inconsistent production and QC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Patrice B
I was expecting a pic of the tiny gaps that people seem to get obsessed over but that was pretty extreme, even for Fender. It the first pic it looked like the entire neck was tilted slightly sideways but in the second pic it looks perfectly fine.

If the bass feels great, seems stable and sounds great I wouldn't worry about it. 70s Fenders can be a bit, ehm, inconsistent. If everything else feels great I would count myself lucky and a winner of the Fender lottery.

It looks great btw, congrats!:thumbsup:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Patrice B
That gap is nothing for a seventies Fender. Yours is probably on the better side of what many people put up with.

Agreed. On the plus side, you don't have to worry about a too-tight tolerance (expansion /contraction) cracking the adjoining finish. Hate to say this, but some of the late 70's offerings were complete schlock along QC lines.

Riis
 
  • Like
Reactions: Patrice B
A sloppy neck pocket on a 70’s Fender is proof of authenticity. Fender was sloppy in that period, and neck pockets like that are pretty much how they made them. The hype around pre-CNS Fenders is, in large part, due to the sloppy work in the 70’s - it’s not that earlier ones were all spectacular, it’s that they looked good when compared with the 70’s production.
 
What’s weird isn’t the gap (my 2006 Jazz has a comparable gap), it’s the way the neck fails to line up with the heel edge. On the other hand, the strings seem to be aligned well enough on the fretboard.
That's the first thing I noticed, also. OP, have you taken the neck off to check if that's actually a Fender body? My guess is that it isn't. I have never seen neck pocket overhang (for lack of a better term) like that, and I used to work in a music store.
 
I had a 1980s MIJ Fender P. Same size of gap. Had a JV Squier, a year earlier, no gap. Inconsistent production and QC.

P.S. I mention this because lawsuit Japanese production is supposed to be perfect, but the MIJ Fender P was just after ths period and definitely not. My two Tokais from the same period are spot on, tight neck pockets.
 
What’s weird isn’t the gap (my 2006 Jazz has a comparable gap), it’s the way the neck fails to line up with the heel edge. On the other hand, the strings seem to be aligned well enough on the fretboard.
What do you mean by this? I'm sorry I'm not quite sure what you're referring to and would like to understand my instrument more if possible
 
The thread asks..........Should this bother me?

Answer.........no.

If your J Bass is all original, it is what it is. If you can play it decently as is, then it is not a problem.

As far as neck gap goes, your neck actually sits close to the edge of the actual neck pocket. The issue is the excess wood above the cut-away that extends past the edge of your neck.

Typical 70s Fender build quality.

Of concern to me are the frets that look like there is no crown edge. The frets looks flat on the top edge. If so, you might want to get those crowned by a luthier.

Otherwise..............Nice J Bass!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Komadinic
The heel of the neck not even close to flush with the edge of the pocket at the bottom edge of the rout in the body is what looks wonky to me....
A62DF90D-34D1-4744-A610-42A9DE1B73CF.jpeg
 
I have a 70s jazz bass i recently got in a trade and it's a pretty great instrument, very worn but sounds and plays nice. I see a huge gap in the neck pocket and it makes me wonder is it something worth worrying about? I don't care about it cosmetically speaking cause the bass itself has been through it but I wouldn't want it to damage the neck somehow.

View attachment 4632888
It'd bother the hell out of me, but if it feels good and sounds good, etc, etc, etc.
 
The thread asks..........Should this bother me?

Answer.........no.

If your J Bass is all original, it is what it is. If you can play it decently as is, then it is not a problem.

As far as neck gap goes, your neck actually sits close to the edge of the actual neck pocket. The issue is the excess wood above the cut-away that extends past the edge of your neck.

Typical 70s Fender build quality.

Of concern to me are the frets that look like there is no crown edge. The frets looks flat on the top edge. If so, you might want to get those crowned by a luthier.

Otherwise..............Nice J Bass!
Thanks for the response, i think they're normal but am not sure. Bass was just setup at 30th street guitars, and they didn't say anything about it so I'm not certain what to think
The heel of the neck not even close to flush with the edge of the pocket at the bottom edge of the rout in the body is what looks wonky to me....View attachment 4633243
That's what was bothering me, there's no gap in the pocket itself but that edge is just gross. I guess I didn't use the right terminology, my bad!