TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
What you said; the Pistols, as a BAND impacted my life, and he had precious little to do with that; Sid’s only legacy was as a personality/myth, which had more to do with him not being the sharpest tool in the shed, being brought up by a trainwreck mother, and repeating the cycle(hello, Sigmund)by being manipulated by a junkie whore parasite. It’s all fun and games until someone gets their arm poked in.No you aren't. Rather you are trying to romanticize the idea of Sid Vicious, then use that as a basis for legitimizing the idea of his musicianship. You are mistaken or in denial, as follows:
Apparently this thread is about likes and dislikes after all. What does your listening habits as a teenager have to do with the question of whether Sid Vicious could play bass? For that matter, since (as someone mentioned in a reply here) Vicious played appreciably no bass on the tracks that became "Never Mind The Bollocks...", what musical or technical importance would he have had for you then?
If something here legitimately is in question, then that is whether Sid Vicious deserves to be considered a bass player. Citing his "very tragic story" first of all smacks of euphamism or simply being apologist. But most importantly, it is irrelevant to what is in question.
There is every indication that Vicious was a right jackass. But whether or not he was is not germane to whether he should be considered to be "a fellow bass player" or any kind of bass player worth remembering.
Upon its original release, I started listening to "Never Mind the Bollocks...", and I own a copy of it to this day. A musician of a different sort in years prior, in 1979 I pickup up a bass guitar for the first time.
Way back then, among many other musics, I listened to various strains of punk or punk-like music. The ones I was influenced by most then were The Ramones, and also The Deadbeats and The Dickies. I never then or in years after counted The Sex Pistols as an influence on my bass guitar playing. But even if I did, in hindsight I would have had to admit that Sid Vicious was not the reason why.
No, it's stereo. The sound is very dense and compressed. Steve Jones' guitar sounds like a Panzer tank! Perfect!
I can't hear any stereo separation at all. Which cut would you say would be the most "Stereo", lol. Now I have to go back and listen again.
What you said; the Pistols, as a BAND impacted my life, and he had precious little to do with that; Sid’s only legacy was as a personality/myth, which had more to do with him not being the sharpest tool in the shed, being brought up by a trainwreck mother, and repeating the cycle(hello, Sigmund)by being manipulated by a junkie whore parasite. It’s all fun and games until someone gets their arm poked in.
Sid only needed four notes.Well, he was better than Jaco, anyway.
(ducking)
I can't hear any stereo separation at all. Which cut would you say would be the most "Stereo", lol. Now I have to go back and listen again.
You got it!So at best, he could pound root notes in a sloppy manner, which is ok since that's the one essence of punk.
The demos were actually released on vinyl on the black market to compete with the official "NMTB," and in his tome "Bootleg," alt-recording history expert Clayton Heylin contends that it was Pistols manager Malcom McClaren himself who covertly distributed the contraband "demo" version.
So at best, he could pound root notes in a sloppy manner, which is ok since that's the one essence of punk.
No you aren't. Rather you are trying to romanticize the idea of Sid Vicious, then use that as a basis for legitimizing the idea of his musicianship. You are mistaken or in denial, as follows:
Apparently this thread is about likes and dislikes after all. What does your listening habits as a teenager have to do with the question of whether Sid Vicious could play bass? For that matter, since (as someone mentioned in a reply here) Vicious played appreciably no bass on the tracks that became "Never Mind The Bollocks...", what musical or technical importance would he have had for you then?
If something here legitimately is in question, then that is whether Sid Vicious deserves to be considered a bass player. Citing his "very tragic story" first of all smacks of euphamism or simply being apologist. But most importantly, it is irrelevant to what is in question.
There is every indication that Vicious was a right jackass. But whether or not he was is not germane to whether he should be considered to be "a fellow bass player" or any kind of bass player worth remembering.
Upon its original release, I started listening to "Never Mind the Bollocks...", and I own a copy of it to this day. A musician of a different sort in years prior, in 1979 I pickup up a bass guitar for the first time.
Way back then, among many other musics, I listened to various strains of punk or punk-like music. The ones I was influenced by most then were The Ramones, and also The Deadbeats and The Dickies. I never then or in years after counted The Sex Pistols as an influence on my bass guitar playing. But even if I did, in hindsight I would have had to admit that Sid Vicious was not the reason why.
Conspiracy time: In the situations OP describes as Sid successfully playing bass, Sid's bass is muted and there's a person actually playing bass behind the curtain somewhere.



Ok, as a fan of the Pistols and punk for 30 years, I will agree with Panek on this topic. Sid could play basic root notes and they did have him turned up on the songs he could play. Look at No Fun, it's two notes and he could play it. Of course he's no Glenn or Klaus Flouride but he had an image and attitude that fit the band to an extent.
The NMTB version is SOOOO much better! "But when your business dies, it'll not return"? What the hell is that? Much better with "But when your mommy dies..."
He was definitely on the first single, “Anarchy”/“I Wanna Be Me” as well as the follow up of “God Save The Queen”(basic tracks recorded Oct, ‘76); B-sides are anyone’s guess, but he was on the “Pretty Vacant” B, a cover of the Stooges’ “No Fun” which came from an earlier Dave Goodman session. Matlock contends that he walked away from the band because of the increasing BS manufactured by McLaren, but agreed to come back as a session player until late Feb ‘77, when he finally had enough in the wake of the story floated that he’d been kicked out for liking The Beatles. As far as who wrote what, it’s all he said/he said...
Glen Matlock - Wikipedia
As Jones learned guitar from playing along with Stooges and NY Dolls albums, any song with Thunders, Asheton, and Williamson moves, like “No Feelings”, I’d have to grant that Jonesy had a hand in; Matlock was a big Small Faces fan; something like “Pretty Vacant” is definitely his. Speaking of The Faces, Glen got his fanboy fantasy come true a few years back...
Since Rod was too cool for school at the time, Simply Red’s Mick Hucknall did a decent job filling in.
For all doubting talent in punk. Check out Nomeansno
Don’t forget about his sense of humor. I think a lot of the lyrics in SP songs are absolutely hilarious!Also, I thought Lydon's book Rotten did a really good job of presenting the band from his perspective, his motives, behavior, etc. Generally speaking he's been a great iconoclast figurehead for long time. I don't necessarily always agree with him, but he was definitely the right guy for the job and carried contempt, spite, threat and general outsider attitude perfectly.