• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Signature Instruments—-What Do We Think About Them?

While I am usually interested in the kinds of choices bassists make when they've collaborated to create a so-called Signature instrument, I have no interest in buying a bass that prominently displays a famous bassist's trademark.

I want to understand the selections they make, they reasoning that supports each design choice, the cost, and how close it came to satisfying the design objectives.

For example, the choices Leland Sklar made when collaborating on the design of his Dingwall; or the choices made by Will Lee for his signature Sadowsky; or the details specified by Nathan East and John Pattutucci for their Yamaha signature basses.

What can I learn from the choices they've made?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RColie and Indiedog
I don't own one.
All my basses are Pdaddy signatures.
But ....
If I was a rich man..... And I'm not ... I'd love to have a...
Paul McCartney signature Hofner.
Chris Squier signature Rick
Gary Thaine signature P. ( Would be weird)
Dennis Dunnaway Jazz.( Or Ebo)
Because I admire those guys...
But... most of the signature instruments out there would have to have the appointments I want, irregardless of the signature,for me to be interested.
 
I mean, I'm not a fan of blink182, but the mark hoppus signature jazz bass is pretty cool looking.

I love Geddy Lee, but I don't have his sig.

Play what you want, and if it makes you feel like your favourite musician, or it just happens to fit you really well - I'm happy you're happy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Indiedog
I really don’t want someone else’s name on my basses… I’ve never bought a signature bass and I won’t say never, but I don’t think I will in the future. Although, I have never played one.

It’s all about the feel for me though, just like a good pair of boots. Buy what’s comfortable not necessarily what you like the look of, you’ll make it look good (or sound good in the case) if it feels right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Indiedog
I'm with you on this, although I recently saw or read that "could" has been used in this context by so many for so long that the two are now interchangeable and both acceptable.
Makes no sense. Not buying it.
If you could care less it means that you do care.

Like: Yes, we have no bananas.
 
I have a couple. They are unique which many "signature" basses are not. The sigs don't bother me and both basses are pretty nice. They are a Fender Roscoe Beck five string and a Warwick Thumb Jack Bruce. The Warwick is from the first run of those basses made when Jack turned fifty. It's somewhat rare. I didn't buy it for his name. It's the finest fretless bass I have ever played.

IMG_6905.jpeg
 
A lot of signature basses are simply alternative configurations not otherwise available without doing your own mods. To non-bass nerds they look like any other bass. No one who isn’t the kind of person to post here would know a Geddy Lee jazz bass is a signature or a JMJ Mustang is a signature. I don’t see a problem with these. It’s a way to play a slightly different version of a standard issue bass.
 
I bought a Jack Casady sig when they first came out. It played a ton of gigs and It was great for what it is: a cheap version of the Les Paul signature bass. It being associated with Jack Casady didn’t factor into me buying one. Matter of fact, I had thought of removing his sig from the headstock, but the bridge pulled out of the body and the fretboard delaminated from the neck before I had the chance. Still have it.