• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Single Cut Basses Love or Hate?

Love my Warwick Thumb Single Cut. You would think because it’s a Warwick it could be heavy and awkward, but this thing balances so nicely. I think it’s a very successful evolution of the thumb design.
CD0915E2-9B3C-402B-A6F0-BF342EB5B077.jpeg
 
I understand that the look of the Singlecut basses is not to everybodys delight. I don t understand some statements that deny the influence of the body on the sound. I like to think of an interview with Roger Sadowsky- an experienced luthier that is not suspicious of following every trend when creating his basses- he said clearly that he can hear a difference, that the extended contact between neck and body offers a vertain amount of evenness and tone across the fretboard and shapes the mids in a special way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJ Bebop
The Marleaux Contra earlier in this thread is so beautiful it's amazing. I personally think it's the most exceptional bass on the market, though I have not played one and don't know if I could justify the price. The Marleaux Mbass model has the top piece but it's not as long as others I've seen. It's the number 1 on my GAS list right now.
 
My issue with single cuts is I need light basses - basses are inherently heavy things, and it takes a lot of attention to detail to make one that works well, balances, and is light. You need mass back by the bridge and a long upper horn for the thing to balance. The last thing you need to do, however, is add unnecessary mass to the upper horn area past what is need for decent strength there - it doesn't help balance, it's pure dead weight.

Yes, they look different. But I wouldn't play one if you gave it to me.