• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Small drone with camera hovering outside my window today.

You only have to be accurate left to right...a straight over the shoulder cast. As long as you throw it high and far enough, the line will settle down on the drone. Distance and elevation just have to be "enough", so focus on the left-right aim.


This is an accident looking for a place to happen. He'll birds' nest the reel and it will all be caught on drone video, likely headed for a date with youtube.
 
I'm far from being a gun advocate or even a fan of guns, but I would definitely get a shotgun and blast that thing out of the sky. That is some total BS.

Keep in mind I just woke up from a short snooze and am in no mood for some A-hole to be hovering a winged camera near my home. I'd probably shoot the owner given the mood I'm in right now. Stupid Pizza Roll-fueled dreams.

Problem is - the air above your property is a "public highway" that you have no right to control.


Look into the case of United States v. Causby(1946).

The Causby family owned a chicken farm. It happened to be underneath the glide paths to the municipal airport, so planes were passing roughly 83 feet above his property. The planes scared his chickens. Scared them so bad they literally killed themselves flying off the walls in fright. "As many as six to ten of their chickens were killed in one day by flying into the walls from fright. The total chickens lost in that manner was about 150,"the Court noted. Production also fell off. The result was the destruction of the use of the property as a commercial chicken farm."

The end result? Triumph for aviators. The Court affirmed that "the air above the minimum safe altitude of flight... is a public highway and part of the public domain."
 
Problem is - the air above your property is a "public highway" that you have no right to control.


Look into the case of United States v. Causby(1946).

The Causby family owned a chicken farm. It happened to be underneath the glide paths to the municipal airport, so planes were passing roughly 83 feet above his property. The planes scared his chickens. Scared them so bad they literally killed themselves flying off the walls in fright. "As many as six to ten of their chickens were killed in one day by flying into the walls from fright. The total chickens lost in that manner was about 150,"the Court noted. Production also fell off. The result was the destruction of the use of the property as a commercial chicken farm."

The end result? Triumph for aviators. The Court affirmed that "the air above the minimum safe altitude of flight... is a public highway and part of the public domain."

Yeah, I was grumpy when I posted that and at the time, didn't care if it was legal or not. As far as the chicken farmer, he got screwed. I'd love to be a judge in a case like that. The airlines and airport would have to chip in and relocate the guy, depending who was there first anyway.

If the drone could be reached with a good blast from a water hose, that would be a safer way to go indeed.

Darn. Now I'm conflicted. Do I feel sorry for the chickens or splurge and go to Popeye's®?
 

Latest posts