wow.
I got these several weeks back and never got around to stringing them up.. Just put them on, and... wow.
Ive been waiting for these (like30yrs) LOL. I just gotta say the lower tension is exactly what I was looking for. I played Eudoxa's back in the 80s and stopped once the prices soared. —funny these are up there $$$, but I just had to try em. SO glad I did.
Over the past few decades ive been wishing I could have a set 'at pitch', that was the tension of D-G-C-F. These are it. I feel the bass is more open, I have more expression, and can 'dig-in' more as well. But probably the nicest element of the set is the attack. Very reminesant of the gut sound, there's a 'snap' and airiness.
For me, the attack, harmonics, and dyads/double-stops are nice... but the DG could use alittle 'more'. And while the general tone is full and on the darker side (which I don't mind), it'd be nice to get alittle more presence, possibly brighter response.
After about 30min of initial playing, I think I'll need to adjust the post. I see in the paperwork they say (to paraphrase) "SP can be placed slightly farther from the bridge". I think this bass may need the other direction—So I'll start there tomorrow after I hear how the strings settle-in a bit.
Im curious what others have found with their basses; did you also experiment with the post? what were you hearing and what action was taken? I have a 320g ebony Tailpiece, but very curious about the 400+gram OEM tailpiece—has anyone added weight to their TP to test out any sound/feel differences?
*I also see they mention the projection being "consistently limited and sound significantly filtered" by adjustable bridges. I using a yamahiko setup so that'll stay, but curious was others have experienced/heard with their adjustable bridges.
1st Impression... impressive.