You mean like Neil Hennings-Ousted Peterson?
(Sorry, Niels-Henning Ørsted Pedersen)

TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
You mean like Neil Hennings-Ousted Peterson?
(Sorry, Niels-Henning Ørsted Pedersen)

Whose English conventions shall we adhere to? Britain's, Canada's, Australia's, New Zealand's or... ?
Is that a Rickensquier, er Rickensquire, er ...Originally Posted byiamthebassmanSweat! er, or is that Sweet...awwww![]()
+1 ... I'll vote for that, too.But some threads need to die. DIE! DIE I SAY!
Haha That's funny.
I spelled it wrong even after owning one. I think it has to do with knowing the word but not really ever using it on a regular basis unless you're, for some reason, discussing mid-evil times or talking about the guitars. Which happen to spell it a different way...
So, why do we have to rely on spell check to communicate? Not flaming you as far too many rely on their spell check.
I read many uncorrected galleys (the advance copies publishers send to libraries and bookstores to get they to buy books) and find these types of errors on a regular basis. Grammar geeks unite!
Dan K.
Medieval times.
mid-evil is between high-evil and low-evil
That's how I originally spelled but spell check changed my mind.![]()
Waterpilot said:Geeze... I just typed this whole big response out just to have my thumbs on my laptop pass over the mouse pad thingy and delete it all. Here's the condensed version...
It's no different then using a dictionary. It's a tool to both learn, and converse coherently. In the quote of mine you posted I missed a word. I don't speak that way. I missed it when proof reading. Forums are different then writing a book or a letter. We don't have days, weeks or years to compose it as it's a conversation that happens quite quickly. Mistakes happen.
How about the words its?
So many people have themselves absolutely convinced that they have to stick an apostrophe somewhere in that word if they are using it in the possessive form. They were taught in grammar school that the possessive form of a word has an apostrophe s. So they [incorrectly] think that also applies to the word its.
It's is a contraction for it is. So whenever someone uses the word it's, you can substitute the words it is and then read the sentence again to see if it makes sense (it won't).
And even though there is no such word as its', people sometimes type that because they feel they must stick an apostrophe somewhere.
The correct form in the possessive is just its.
Example:
The bass was admired by many bassists due to its color and body shape.
-NOT-
The bass was admired by many bassists due to it is (it's) color and body shape.
It's not that hard is it? I have more trouble with 'their' and 'they're'.
Great point....
But I believe most of our political problems is because people don't WANT accurate communication, they merely want the 20 second soundbite so subtlety and nuance are discarded.
...
Because "squire" is the spelling most people are familiar with and the correct one for the term squire as most people use it. Fender decided to use a diff spelling for their product line.
Waterpilot said:Geeze... I just typed this whole big response out just to have my thumbs on my laptop pass over the mouse pad thingy and delete it all. Here's the condensed version...
It's no different then using a dictionary. It's a tool to both learn, and converse coherently. In the quote of mine you posted I missed a word. I don't speak that way. I missed it when proof reading. Forums are different then writing a book or a letter. We don't have days, weeks or years to compose it as it's a conversation that happens quite quickly. Mistakes happen.