• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Solid color or wood grain?

Solid color or wood grain?

  • Visible wood grain.

    Votes: 265 77.9%
  • Solid color.

    Votes: 75 22.1%

  • Total voters
    340
I got wood...

IMG_6867.jpg
 
It depends on the sanding job/ prep. IME natural finishes require better sanding and the majority of painted basses do not have the best sanding. But I am OCD when it comes down to what should be done vs. what needs to be done. That being said I am disgusted by painted basses where you can see the thickness sander marks under the gloss. Seeing scratches under a trans/clear finish is just as bad, if not worse. metallic paint can also add a half a pound of weight and hinders the open-ness of the high end, that being said Im a sucker for C.A.R.
 
Invisible solid grain.

Um, would that be holly?

attachment.jpg


;)

I love seeing wood grain. My nearly finished ACG is going to have a stunning (IMO) redwood top.

img_5776.jpg

img_5959.jpg


I'm also a sucker for great trans finishes like this pair of Valenti basses, one of which (the P5) used to be mine.

valenti2.jpg

ValentiRedJazz.jpg


It's an interesting question though, because I find that up close (where I most often view the instrument) I greatly prefer the natural or trans finishes but when I see pictures from gigs from the audiences perspective I think solid color basses look better as you lose a lot of the subtle beauty of bare wood and trans finishes look a bit washed out.

Good to have both I think.