• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Some physics questions

Lately I've been thinking more and more about physics, and i have some questions, though they may be stupid. Im gonna be a junior, and havent taken physics, but read alot and watch a lot of videos on youtube, so thats why i have been thinking about it.

Ok, first question. This might be stupid, but what keeps atoms bonded to other atoms? As in if two pieces of wood from the same tree are set next to eachother, why dont they bond? I know its a stupid qeuestoin, but what is stopping them from doing so?

What do color and taste have to do with physics? Why do two different sources of water taste different? If they are made of the same thigns molecularly, shouldn't they taste the asame? And how are things clear? And how can two different plastics be two different colors if they are the same at the atomic level?

Sorry if these are stupid questions, but im just curious.
 
As far as water tasting different, pure H2O will taste the same as any other H2O... its the impurities that make it taste different... water from your tap has sodium, iron, fluoride, and all kinds of other crap that make it "taste"
 
If you really want to look into physics/chemistry, I recommend that you buy a 2nd hand basic university chemistry book from Amazon or some other place, they can be had for 10-20 bucks in "somewhat used" condition.

I own the Silberberg's "Chemistry: Molecular nature of matter and change", which is a pretty thick book that starts from the basics and runs you through a lot of chemistry in relatively easy read, it might be a good place to start.
 
Lately I've been thinking more and more about physics, and i have some questions, though they may be stupid. Im gonna be a junior, and havent taken physics, but read alot and watch a lot of videos on youtube, so thats why i have been thinking about it.

Ok, first question. This might be stupid, but what keeps atoms bonded to other atoms? As in if two pieces of wood from the same tree are set next to eachother, why dont they bond? I know its a stupid qeuestoin, but what is stopping them from doing so?

What do color and taste have to do with physics? Why do two different sources of water taste different? If they are made of the same thigns molecularly, shouldn't they taste the asame? And how are things clear? And how can two different plastics be two different colors if they are the same at the atomic level?

Sorry if these are stupid questions, but im just curious.

Well, wood atoms are well known for their xenophobia. They refuse to bond to other wood even if it is the same variety without force. Even if this wood is cut from the same tree, the wood atoms see themselves as being separate and superior to the other parts of the tree. This also explains why you sometimes see trees dropping branches. Sometimes the atoms get all full of themselves and just ditch the rest of the tree. Basically, wood atoms are jerks.

Taste and color have tons to do with physics. Without color, they could not print physics books. Without physics books, do physics really even exist? Now, considering taste in regard to physics, I think the association is clear. If you place any tasty item near my mouth it will undoubtedly disappear down the "black hole" that is my mouth. In addition, this amazing facet of physics gives me added mass. As far as things being clear, those atoms just don't feel like calling all kinds of attention to themselves, to they eschew color so they can lay low. The opposite goes for plastics of varying color despite the atomic similarities.

Happy I could help.
 
Ok, first question. This might be stupid, but what keeps atoms bonded to other atoms?

This is really more of a chemistry question, but the simple answer is that atoms are most stable when the have a full outer shell of electrons, either through covalent or ionic bonding. In the case of ionic compounds (salts) the opposite charges bind the atoms in crystals

As in if two pieces of wood from the same tree are set next to eachother, why dont they bond? I know its a stupid qeuestoin, but what is stopping them from doing so?

Also a chemistry question. The answer is electron repulsion, the same force responsible for almost every interaction you experience on a daily basis and the reason you don't fall through the floor even though you and it are both made up of almost entirely empty space. The electrons of the atoms repel one another.

Atoms in wood are already bonded, primarily as a long chain of sugars known as cellulose. These bonds can be broken, (by combustion for instance) but won't do so instantaneously without something to drive the reaction.

What do color and taste have to do with physics?

Color? Lots. The color we perceive is due to the frequencies of light being absorbed, reflected and transmitted by the object. While this is an oversimplification, if something is green, it is because the object absorbs most frequencies, but reflects green. Something white reflects almost all frequencies of light and something black absorbs almost all frequencies, which is why black is a bad color to wear on a hot day.

Taste? Doesn't have much to do with physics, as it is more of a biology and chemistry topic. I can give you a long answer if you like, but basically the different receptors on your tongue send information to your brain based on the molecular makeup of the food you are eating, in some ways similar to your sense of smell.

Why do two different sources of water taste different? If they are made of the same thigns molecularly, shouldn't they taste the asame?

As already noted, pure water does taste the same. Or to be more accurate, pure water is said to have no taste at all. Most of us live in cities where there are impurities in the water, either unintentionally or purposefully, like in the case of flouride compounds added to many water supplies for its dental health benefits.

Some places (like Pilsen in the Czech Republic) have really soft water, but most of us either get impure tap water or buy bottled water, which is either comes from natural sources of pure water (Evian comes from Lake Geneva after being filtered through glacial sands) or is produced by sending city water through reverse osmosis. Dasani water is filtered this way.

And how are things clear? And how can two different plastics be two different colors if they are the same at the atomic level?

Things are clear if the spectrum of visible light is neither reflected or absorbed by the material but rather it passes through. We are able to see that they are there because (1) a small percentage of light is reflected, which is why we can see a faint reflection of ourselves as we look through a window and (2) light travels at different speeds through different materials, which is why a straw looks "bent" when it sits in a glass of water.

Plastics are different colors either because a dye is used or they aren't the same at the molecular level. Plastics is a very general term that is applied to a great number of man made polymers.
 
BigO covered things fairly well, if not briefly, so I'll comment on the questions themselves.

I don't care what one has or has not not taken in school, these questions suggest that you may not be the most observant or aware person around. This is the kind of stuff I was asking when I was a young child, not in high school. Perhaps before taking physics (or any class) you should consider learning the basics of how the world works - in fact books of similar titles such as "How Things Work" might be a great start.

They're not stupid questions at all - just very odd as these are the sorts of things I learned so early that it seems like I've always known them.
 
Lately I've been thinking more and more about physics, and i have some questions, though they may be stupid. Im gonna be a junior, and havent taken physics, but read alot and watch a lot of videos on youtube, so thats why i have been thinking about it.

Ok, first question. This might be stupid, but what keeps atoms bonded to other atoms? As in if two pieces of wood from the same tree are set next to eachother, why dont they bond? I know its a stupid qeuestoin, but what is stopping them from doing so?

What do color and taste have to do with physics? Why do two different sources of water taste different? If they are made of the same thigns molecularly, shouldn't they taste the asame? And how are things clear? And how can two different plastics be two different colors if they are the same at the atomic level?

Sorry if these are stupid questions, but im just curious.



The tree question is actually a brilliant question because actually if you were to cut two different pieces of wood so that they each had a perfectly flat face down to the molecular level, and if you put those two faces together, the pieces of wood would instantly bond together into one solid piece of wood. The force doing the bonding is the electromagnetic force carried by the electons. The reason that two pieces of wood don't normally bind when placed together is because the points of contact between the pieces are so few and so small as compared to the overall surface area (because of the roughness of the surfaces at the molecular level) that there are not enough electrons to create the necessary force.

Color is the retina's reaction to a specific wavelengh of light. The color receptors in the eye (cones) are wavelength specific and there are several different ones in the eye that, when their neurological signals are combined by the brain, are perceived as color.

Taste is similar in that common molecules in food fit into specific chemical receptors on different areas of the tongue and depending on the combinations of molecules in the food you eat, are perceived as taste. The sense of taste is also parallel to the sense of smell, which also works by using specialized chemical receptors.

Look up the clear/versus colored materials on your own; Dr Science has a three question limit per querent.

;)
 
I don't care what one has or has not not taken in school, these questions suggest that you may not be the most observant or aware person around.

Ah, but there are people around with absolutely no interest in sciences, which would explain their "illiteracy" when it comes to chemistry or physics.

On the same note, I've encountered perfectly normal, even quite "street-smart" persons who have not even a clue about stuff like history of the 20th century or fine arts covered in popular culture. I suppose some topics just pass people's brains with no recollection, and wouldn't judge anyone based on few lines of text them admitting that they have no idea on the subject.
 
What do color and taste have to do with physics? Why do two different sources of water taste different? If they are made of the same thigns molecularly, shouldn't they taste the asame?

Our experience of flavour is actually a combination of taste and odour.

Taste is our ability to detect five different primary chemical signatures when the substance is in contact with our tongues.

The first is "salt" which is our ability to detect metal ions such as sodium, which are required in relatively large quantities to maintain electrolytic balance in our bodies.

The second is "sweet" which is our ability to detect simple carbohydrates, useful because carbohydrate is our primary energy supply.

The third is "bitter" which we naturally shy away from. This makes sense as many toxic compounds have a bitter taste.

The fourth is "sour" which is our ability to detect acid, which we again we naturally shy away from. This makes sense because food undergoes acidic fermentation as it spoils.

The fifth is less well known and is generally refered to as "umami", which is a Japanese word that I believe translates roughly as "savoury deliciousness" or something like that. It's our ability to detect certain organic compounds, particularly the amino acid glutamate. This tends to be triggered by foods with high protein contents, which it makes sense to enjoy as we require relatively large amounts of protein. Flavour enhancers like monosodium glutamate take advantage of this.

Some argue that there are taste receptors for fat, but I think that's more a mouth-feel experience.

In addition, foods generally contain volatile organic compounds that add to the complexity of the taste, but which are detected by olfactory receptors in the nose (even though we believe that we're tasting them in our mouth).

The reason that water from different sources doesn't taste the same is that it isn't identical. There will be different metal ions in the water and the water and the water will be of slightly different pH, so our taste receptors will be firing slightly differently in response to them.
 
These questions are not stupid :)
You need this kind of inquisition to do well in college!



1) Wood will not stick to itself as the atoms and molecules are covalently bonded to each other. The atoms in a piece of wood (or plastic or any other non-metallic compound) share electrons in the valence (outermost) shell. It takes energy to break and form new bonds - think of fusing two melted pieces of plastic together.

Metal will stick to itself through electromagnetic forces by polarization, but it will not become the same compound until some sort of energy is applied (extreme heat).

2) To better understand the colors you perceive, look up the visible light spectrum. Colors are basically different wavelengths of light, some we cannot see because the wavelength is too large or too small (UVA, UVB, X-rays, etc). This is an area of physics called optics.

Taste is biochemistry - different compounds react with the taste receptors on your tongue differently. Oddly enough, your sense of smell has a lot to do with taste as well. Try holding your nose when eating, you can barely taste what you're eating.

3) Water can differ in taste because the chemical make-up of all drinkable water is not the same. Some water will contain minerals and different levels of acidity. Chemists use de-ionized water in experiments and cleaning, as it is free from minerals and other compounds that may mess with results.

4) All water is not the same, chemically.

5) Again, this is an area of optics and chemistry. Materials appear to be 'red' or 'green' because they absorb only certain wavelengths of light. Black absorbs most colors of the spectrum and white reflects most of them. If and object is clear, no absorption is taking place.

6) Two plastics of a different color are not the same, chemically/atomically.
 
LoL i do know about phisics so im into something bigger. How is it possible that anti-matter exists? can anyone tell me whats the entire family of sub-atomical particles? and the last one i know a Takion is a theorical particle but is it possible for it to exist? i mean how unprobable would it be that there is something in the universe wich mass is negative?????
 
Ah, but there are people around with absolutely no interest in sciences, which would explain their "illiteracy" when it comes to chemistry or physics.

On the same note, I've encountered perfectly normal, even quite "street-smart" persons who have not even a clue about stuff like history of the 20th century or fine arts covered in popular culture. I suppose some topics just pass people's brains with no recollection...

You don't see a problem with any of this? Fair enough. :hmm:
 
LoL i do know about phisics so im into something bigger. How is it possible that anti-matter exists? can anyone tell me whats the entire family of sub-atomical particles? and the last one i know a Takion is a theorical particle but is it possible for it to exist? i mean how unprobable would it be that there is something in the universe wich mass is negative?????

the theoretical prediction for anti-matter comes quite naturally when you combine special relativity with quantum mechanics. so on a basic level, the answer is "because that's how it appears the universe works."

now, the disparity between matter and anti-matter, THAT'S a HUGE question!

there are three "families" of particles, and each family has particles called leptons and quarks.

we are well acquainted with the first family:

electrons
electron neutrinos
up quarks
down quarks
(and their associated antiparticles!)

(the two up quarks and a down quark give a proton, while two downs and an up give a neutron)

the two other families have a similar structure:

muons
muon neutrinos
strange quarks
charm quarks
their antiparticles

tauons
tauon neutrinos
top quarks
bottom quarks
their antiparticles

the members of these two families decay into the members of the first family. i don't quite understand why they are unstable while the first family is stable, nor does anyone understand why there are only three families of particles (if, indeed, there aren't more).


tachyons don't have negative mass. they have imaginary mass. that's a real problem. you can't measure imaginary quantities, so i personally find tachyons distasteful.
 
The descriptions of why wood won't bond to itself are decent, but there is one thing missing. You do have electrons outside the atoms that will repulse and keep the atoms from sticking together, but if that was all there is to it, then nothing would bond. There are also "strong" and "weak" nuclear forces that create bonds in an atom. In very short distances, these forces are stronger than the magnetic forces associated with electrons. Unfortunately, they are very, very short ranged so you have to smack the atoms together REALLY hard to get them close enough to make that bond. Theres a lot more to it, but that's the basic gist of it.
PS I was a physics major for 2 years in college before switching to Mech E :) If you have any more questions, PM me and if I don't know it right off, I'll look it up. It's good review.
 
Chipsonfire,

I think you have a misunderstanding of the nature of the strong and weak interactions. I've already surpassed my public nerdity quotient for the week so I'm not going to go into real detail, but they are not responsible for atomic bonding.

While a simplification, the strong force is what holds the nuclei of atoms together, overcoming the electrical force of the protons electrical repulsion to one another. The fact that it works only for short distances is why large nuclei are unstable and radioactive.

The weak interaction is responsible for Beta decay.

Neither of them have anything to do with one atom bonding with another atom.
 
The descriptions of why wood won't bond to itself are decent, but there is one thing missing. You do have electrons outside the atoms that will repulse and keep the atoms from sticking together, but if that was all there is to it, then nothing would bond. There are also "strong" and "weak" nuclear forces that create bonds in an atom. In very short distances, these forces are stronger than the magnetic forces associated with electrons. Unfortunately, they are very, very short ranged so you have to smack the atoms together REALLY hard to get them close enough to make that bond. Theres a lot more to it, but that's the basic gist of it.
PS I was a physics major for 2 years in college before switching to Mech E :) If you have any more questions, PM me and if I don't know it right off, I'll look it up. It's good review.


the strong and weak forces have absolutely nothing to do with atomic bound states. that's all coulomb/electromagnetic stuff.


i read the other day, in fact, that it had always been thought that things don't stick together because of coulomb repulsion, but it's actually because of the pauli exclusion principle. pretty wild.