Can anyone suggest any songs with lots of dominant sharp 5 chords? I need some for a lesson.
Thanks
Thanks
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Can anyone suggest any songs with lots of dominant sharp 5 chords? I need some for a lesson.
Thanks
Do you want +7 with natural 9ths chords for the whole-tone scale or +7 implying the altered scale?
For the altered scale, any jazz tunes in minor could be a good source. A minor Blues for example.
This article cites many examples, most of which either have, or could have, the 7th in addition to the #5.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augmented_triad
Be aware that many leadsheets in fakebooks will write a 7+5 chord when, in fact, the chord is a dominant with a b9 and b13. The first chord in the bridge to "Stella..." is one example.
And, of course, there's the G7 b13 later in Stella that is often treated as 7+5. Looking for a song with vast expanses of that sound.
Be aware that many leadsheets in fakebooks will write a 7+5 chord when, in fact, the chord is a dominant with a b9 and b13. The first chord in the bridge to "Stella..." is one example.
The one thing that trips me out, why didn't Abersol correct all those X7+5 chords to read X7 b13? Thats why its muy importante to actually listen to the tunes instead of just reading them out of the Real Book. I remember the first time I played through Stella, and with my nascent jazz chops decided I should play G whole tone on the G7+5 chord...it just didn't work...it sounded odd and stoopid...don't get me wrong, whole tone is a beautiful thing, just play it where it works...the ears will always win...This is very true.
Take a look at the first five chords to Someday My Prince Will Come.
In Bb, it is often written as:
|| BbMaj7 | D7+5 | EbMaj7 | G7+5 | Cm7 | etc...
The second and fourth chords are commonly written as X7+5.
These chords, at the second and fourth measures, would probably be more correctly noted (from the Common Practice Period) as D7b13 (no 5th, 9th, 11th) - D, F#, C, Bb, and G7b13 (no 5th, 9th, 11th) - G, B, F, Eb, respectively.
But it's a lot easier to read X7+5 and know that it's really an X7b13 (no 5th, 9th, 11th).
![]()
The one thing that trips me out, why didn't Abersol correct all those X7+5 chords to read X7 b13?