• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

SpaceX and other space stuff

Apparently it's a trend to take the most attractive female engineer you can find in your organization, and give her a mic to host your live stream. At least Jessie Anderson of SpaceX, as the manufacturing lead, discusses plenty of technical details, and knows more than one adjective to describe what's going on. (We were on the verge of declaring a drinking game every time the fawning hostess said "exciting" and "comfortable.") The lack of mission control & radio traffic, while said hostess simply parroted what was in her earpiece, was a huge snore.

Compared to SpaceX launches (made by nerds, for nerds), this played as little more than a self-aggrandizing infomercial aimed at people with the money to go on a "technically-in-space" joyride, and be offered the chance to buy a commemorative SUV to go with their souvenir pens and flight suits. That it served as a less-than-subtle middle finger in the general direction of Bezos was probably some icing on Sir Richard's cake.

In the end, that was a lot to sit through, for very little in the way of substance.
Can’t really say why but…. I’m a SpaceX type of guy.

My opinion of the preflight thing is that it was a lot of BS. Almost sickening.
 
I'm no Branson fan, but anyone doing anything spacewise is good... when I was a kid reading Asimov etc the space race was full on and I thought people would be living on Mars when I was an adult then it all just died away... if the affectation of billionaires is what it takes to bring all that back to life then fine.
 
We did notice the little bump-outs in all the window frames for every passenger's personal camera. :smug: :snaphappy:

And let me clarify before anything gets derailed: I don't begrudge anyone the enjoyment of their resources. If one has the money to pay for this kind of ride, by all means, go for it, and enjoy. Cruise around in your souvenir SUV, have the complimentary chapagne, and show your shiny flight suit selfie to all your friends.

But do not try to convince me that a three-hour air-conditioned plane ride, culminating in a single, rocket-powered parabolic hump for 60 seconds of weightlessness (before scrambling back into your seatbelts) puts you anywhere near the same category as Neil Armstrong, et al.

For the last 50 years, people have had to work incredibly hard, master a host of complex skills and knowledge, and sacrifice far more than their time, to earn the title of "astronaut." Now we're apparently in the brave new era of people simply purchasing it like a fashion accessory.

And that's where I call bulls[pace].


Astro-noughts.


Eventually it will be like the queues of "mountaineers", making the dash from camp 4, to the summit of Everest - a procession of tourists riding a conveyor belt up to the shoulders of giants.
 
To me, IMO, going to space is staying up there for a while. The minimum of 1 orbit. But really longer. Heck, they don’t even wear pressure suits…:meh:
A glorified carnival ride…

It doesn't compare to the Apollo missions or the Shuttle, but it's far more than a high-altitude plane flight... they reached almost 4 times the ceiling of the SR-71 which is pretty impressive, even if it was only for a few minutes.

The thing that is maybe distasteful for those of us who remember the moon landings era is how it is now turned into a personal publicity exercise for a few billionaires, and how today's technology makes it all look too easy compared with the pioneering, high-risk era of space flight. Not that there aren't still risks, as Branson's project has already found out.
 
Yup. That smelled kinda...

upload_2021-7-13_18-45-52.jpeg
 

Latest posts