• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

SpaceX and other space stuff

Any of you guys care to recommend me an affordable telescope?
A TB thread that might be useful:
Looking to buy an astronomical telescope - please advise.

And the "How To" section of Sky & Telescope has several useful posts:
Looking to buy an astronomical telescope - please advise.

For people just starting out, "affordable" is one factor, but I also advise folks to keep things simple to begin with. A big, heavy, cumbersome telescope with finicky optics can be more of an annoyance for some folks than a help.

I usually advise people to start out with a basic refractor-type telescope, both for low cost, and ease of operation. Celestron makes some decent beginner refractors, and even some compact "Travel Scopes" that come in backpack kits (I've got one of Invalid Link Removed models for when I'm feeling lazy). You're not going to see things the way the Hubble and Webb space telescopes see them, but for quick, garb-and-go backyard viewing of our Moon and the local planets, they do just fine.

Here's the refractor section at B&H Photo/Video (an excellent vendor, where we've shopped for 20+ years, and recommend most highly):
Invalid Link Removed

Good luck & clear skies! :thumbsup:
 
Last edited:
Any of you guys care to recommend me an affordable telescope?
...and we're back. :whistle:

Sorry, I was in a rush this morning, and didn't have much time to type out any more than the above.

Another very good option when considering what kind of telescope you'd like is to find a local astronomy club near you. Most of these clubs have public stargazing events, where those with an interest in astronomy are often welcomed and encouraged to have a look at (and through) the 'scopes of the club members there. Some clubs even have "loaner" 'scopes available for members who are just starting out, or want to try something different.

Since you list your location in Florida, I did a quick search for "Florida astronomy clubs." Here are some links you can parse through at your leisure:

Astronomy Clubs in FL | 2024 List | GO ASTRONOMY

NEFAS | Northeast Florida Astronomical Society

Clubs

Astronomy Clubs in Florida • Love the Night Sky

About — KSCAA


Again, good luck! :thumbsup:
 
WOW! :jawdrop: Images are now back from the Odysseus landing, and even if it wasn't perfect, this is still amazing to see:

That moment when you land on the Moon, break a leg, and are about to topple over

The whole writeup is well worth reading, but for those who just want the pics...


Crunch / ouchie:


IM1-800x437.jpg




Engine still burning briefly after touchdown / tip-over:






To note what someone in the Ars commentariat said, it's worth remembering that before humans made it to the Moon, the US and Russia sent lots of lander probes, and most of them failed before there was any kind of regular success.

Space is really hard, even in our own neighborhood. Mishap aside, the fact that this thing made it intact, and remained functional even as it is, is still very much a worthwhile accomplishment.

:thumbsup:
 
  • Like
Reactions: fig and ahc
While I respect the complexity of all this, I still have to be disappointed.

For me, this is about - not enough reuse of previous learning, lack of proper funding, etc. - not, complexity of some new endeavor. We landed people on the moon safely on the first try - and then repeated that 5 more times - 55 years ago.

We are basically spending bazillions on the wrong program - SLS - while investing very little at this time in returning to the moon Now. Yeah, we have big plans, but we should be there Now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Winslow
We landed people on the moon safely on the first try
It's easy to forget that it was hardly the "first try" that got people on the Moon; The Surveyor series was the test program for navigation, course correction, and soft landing ability that allowed NASA to work out the technology before putting human crews at risk (two of the Surveyors crashed, too). The Apollo program never ran on completely untested principles. That would have been foolhardy more than heroic.

We are basically spending bazillions on the wrong program - SLS
Now that is correct. The SLS is a bloated pork program that was obsolete before it ever took off.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: fig and ahc