TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
So, why is it that the bolt-ons don't have nearly as many finish options as the neck-thrus?
peledog said:Edit: I realize there were other members who contributed. cjmodulus and seventhframe? Excellent work and congrats on being selected for the DVD. Well done!
Applause to JPS - fantastic stuff as always. Sorry I couldn't make it up there this weekend. I'm so stoked to see my Forte!

You don't want your contact point sharp as this can easily lead to cut/broken strings. It should optimally be rounded. Your intonation point is flawed as you would intonate the saddles position, not whether it's tilted or not. Intonate flat, then tilt? Yeah you're going to be off. Intonate tilt then set flat? Guess what.
Another issue with having them tilted is you're altering the string force into a more forward motion (pushing from more towards the back of the saddle than center) than more downward when flat. This means that if your set screw ever comes unknowingly loose, your saddles are going to be more likely to start to vibrate forward, pushing you sharp (fretwise tuned/flat open string because of reduced tention). Tilted back the downward force is not evenly distributed to the bridge plate.
Someone at Spector thought that the bridge saddles looked better with the string coming off the saddles at even angles (peledog's are actually further back then even Spector recommends, so his issue could be compounded).
This would be a fine theory if the bridge plate underneath were at the same angle as the saddle. It is not obviously.
It's funny how no other major bridge manufacturer (including Spectors new alternate/US bolt on standard bridge maker Hipshot), including Spector themselves with the in your face obvious, non-tilt adjustable intonation bridge, recommends anything like this. Hmmmm.......
There will be no side to side issues either way.
This bridge, except for having great high mass, is a caveman like, extremely limited design in this day and age. It was innovative in it's day for it's mass, but has been showing it's age for a couple decades now. I wish they would just go with all Hipshot "A" bridges and put this one out to pasture. It might bring in some newer players that look at Spectors as "80's basses" for more than just image reasons.
Thanks Jeff...
Mad,
Thats a great idea me and Jeff in the same room playing Spectors all night lol![]()
![]()
![]()

Awesome videos JPS!!! And LimaGuy, nice soundtracks!!!![]()

you picked the right group to askfirst off... welcome to the bass world... second off... what is a "modest" purchase? $300, $700, $1000 its different for everyone... Spector makes a lot of basses in most price ranges, all great in their own way. I have yet to play one I didn't like (others have more experience then me)
We will be more than happy to help you find a bass or point you in the right direction...

Well, I successfully manage to burn something in my SVT-4Pro
Smelled smoke, saw a spark....more smoke. Now it's at the Dr.
![]()

The tone I hear when you say "Spector".
Invalid Link Removed
Nothing else sounds even close to that.


You don't want your contact point sharp as this can easily lead to cut/broken strings. It should optimally be rounded. Your intonation point is flawed as you would intonate the saddles position, not whether it's tilted or not. Intonate flat, then tilt? Yeah you're going to be off. Intonate tilt then set flat? Guess what.
Another issue with having them tilted is you're altering the string force into a more forward motion (pushing from more towards the back of the saddle than center) than more downward when flat. This means that if your set screw ever comes unknowingly loose, your saddles are going to be more likely to start to vibrate forward, pushing you sharp (fretwise tuned/flat open string because of reduced tention). Tilted back the downward force is not evenly distributed to the bridge plate.
Someone at Spector thought that the bridge saddles looked better with the string coming off the saddles at even angles (peledog's are actually further back then even Spector recommends, so his issue could be compounded).
This would be a fine theory if the bridge plate underneath were at the same angle as the saddle. It is not obviously.
It's funny how no other major bridge manufacturer (including Spectors new alternate/US bolt on standard bridge maker Hipshot), including Spector themselves with the in your face obvious, non-tilt adjustable intonation bridge, recommends anything like this. Hmmmm.......
There will be no side to side issues either way.
This bridge, except for having great high mass, is a caveman like, extremely limited design in this day and age. It was innovative in it's day for it's mass, but has been showing it's age for a couple decades now. I wish they would just go with all Hipshot "A" bridges and put this one out to pasture. It might bring in some newer players that look at Spectors as "80's basses" for more than just image reasons.
lol IMO there are other tracks off that album I think are closer, but AIC is the only reason I know about Spector. Thank god for that![]()
Mike from AIC and Tim from Rage Against the Machine are what caused me to pick up the bass in the first place
Though my spector is #1 and my musicman-type bass is #2 so i guess the AIC tone wins in that category![]()
Hi everyone,
I am new to the bass world. I am an accomplished drummer and piano player and i am starting bass.
I want to get a nice bass and don't want to have to change instrument anytime soon.
I love the sound of the Spector NS-2 and Fbass basses in general. I am also considering a more 'modest' purchase such as a Fender Jazz Bass or a MusicMan Stingray.
Can anyone Please offer any advice?
PS: Sorry if i post in the wrong section of the forum. I am not very proficient yet.....
. The F basses I have played sounded good, and played very well, hard to go wrong there. To me though they didn't sound much different than Fodera's , Smith's, or Roscoe's. All amazing basses that sound good and play well, but they didn't have a "signature" tone to my ears. I'm not a fender fan, but their basses are pretty easy to work with in a studio setting, and not an incredibly bad choice if that's all your doing. The down side is only about 1 in 5 is even playable without major work from the get go. The Euro bolt-ons for example have only 3 options? (cherry, black zebrawood, zebrazood).
+1 I love Mike's tone!!!
The tones that got me were same as grendle as well as:
Pantera - I'm Broken (Video) - YouTube @ 2:28 it really shines!!!
I wish i had gotten into Pantera earlier in life, but the first album i bought of theirs was "The Great Southern Trendkill" Rex's tone had my jaw on the floor!!!
PanterA - Floods - YouTube @3:50 playing, tone, everything = jaw on the floor = my ringtone
These are what i hear when i hear "Spector"
Does your Forte have the new intonation bridge?
If so, and your saddle height is higher than the anchor point of the intonation screws in the back of the bridge, the saddles are probably tilted slightly back as they are inline with the screw sloping back to its anchor point. This would be physically inevitable with this bridge, not due to shop setup preference. The tilt (whether forward or back) of the saddle will have to be inline with the incline or decline of the intonation screw running through it back to it's anchor point.
Thanks for that. I have save enough to buy a very nice bass and i don't want to have to change in the next 2 or 5 years. I am very serious about learning. I really like the sound of the NS-2 but maybe getting that monster is a bit overkill......![]()
