worshiprocker
Tonepump Junkie
- Aug 12, 2011
- 4,683
- 1,782
- Disclosures
- Endorsing Artist: Spector Basses
I've got my flame suit on. Although, I'm not trying to start anything, I'm just trying to gain understanding.
I'm seeing a lot of Kramer hype in the thread over the past bit. Seems that Kramer's are THE Spector to obtain right now. It's kind of weird for me and that's why I'm asking you guys. Why are the Kramers such a big deal? This is the part of Spector's history that is much like that of Leo Fender's (the CBS buyout) and Mike Tobias (The Gibson buyout). The Kramer's are basses that aren't made by Stuart, correct? So, why are the Kramer era's so highly coveted when other small builders (I know, Leo wasn't small) were bought out by a large Corporation (and still made in America) and shunned. You just about can't give away a Gibson era Tobias, even though Mike did stay on with the company for a while. But his current MTD's and his Pre-Gibson Tobias' fetch major money.
It always seems that the magic leaves when a small builder sells to a large guitar company but for some reason Kramer was able to maintain the magic?
So again, not trying to get flamed, just trying to gain some understanding into the Kramer era Spectors.![]()
I think Stuart was still building them even for Kramer... could be wrong on that..... I know the Kramer Era US 9v has A LOT to do with it and the aged wood and slimmer necks suit a lot of people's taste here. that's my theory anyways, nothing like vintage wood, that I can vouch for.
I'm happy with my non kramer era basses



it's still under warranty.